“特殊市场情况”条款的运用及其对反倾销规制的启示

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS East Asian Economic Review Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2017.21.3.330
Mikyung Yun
{"title":"“特殊市场情况”条款的运用及其对反倾销规制的启示","authors":"Mikyung Yun","doi":"10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2017.21.3.330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The particular market situation provision of the WTO Antidumping Agreement is increasingly invoked against what may be described as \"input-dumping,\" but this potentially violates the current Antidumping Agreement rules. This paper examines the practice and recent changes regarding the PMS provision in the US by critically examining relevant antidumping investigations in the US in light of GATT/WTO jurisprudence. Such US practice has not yet been extensively subjected to scholarly examination. The paper finds that the recent legal change in the US widens the scope and applicability of the PMS provision to cover input subsidies, allowing the use of not only surrogate prices but also surrogate costs. Further, the required standard of evidence to find PMS seems to have been diminished in the recent application. A widespread use of the PMS provision in such a deviant way calls for a fundamental review of the current trade remedy rules of the WTO.","PeriodicalId":41122,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of \\\"Particular Market Situation\\\" Provision and its Implications for Regulation of Antidumping\",\"authors\":\"Mikyung Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2017.21.3.330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The particular market situation provision of the WTO Antidumping Agreement is increasingly invoked against what may be described as \\\"input-dumping,\\\" but this potentially violates the current Antidumping Agreement rules. This paper examines the practice and recent changes regarding the PMS provision in the US by critically examining relevant antidumping investigations in the US in light of GATT/WTO jurisprudence. Such US practice has not yet been extensively subjected to scholarly examination. The paper finds that the recent legal change in the US widens the scope and applicability of the PMS provision to cover input subsidies, allowing the use of not only surrogate prices but also surrogate costs. Further, the required standard of evidence to find PMS seems to have been diminished in the recent application. A widespread use of the PMS provision in such a deviant way calls for a fundamental review of the current trade remedy rules of the WTO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East Asian Economic Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East Asian Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2017.21.3.330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2017.21.3.330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

越来越多的人援引世贸组织反倾销协定的特定市场情况条款来反对所谓的“投入倾销”,但这可能违反了现行的反倾销协定规则。本文根据GATT/WTO的判例,通过对美国相关反倾销调查的批判性审查,考察了美国PMS条款的实践和最近的变化。美国的这种做法尚未受到广泛的学术研究。本文发现,美国最近的法律变化扩大了PMS条款的范围和适用性,以涵盖投入补贴,不仅允许使用替代价格,还允许使用替代成本。此外,在最近的申请中,发现经前综合症所需的证据标准似乎有所减少。以如此不正常的方式广泛使用PMS条款,要求对世贸组织现行贸易救济规则进行根本审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Use of "Particular Market Situation" Provision and its Implications for Regulation of Antidumping
The particular market situation provision of the WTO Antidumping Agreement is increasingly invoked against what may be described as "input-dumping," but this potentially violates the current Antidumping Agreement rules. This paper examines the practice and recent changes regarding the PMS provision in the US by critically examining relevant antidumping investigations in the US in light of GATT/WTO jurisprudence. Such US practice has not yet been extensively subjected to scholarly examination. The paper finds that the recent legal change in the US widens the scope and applicability of the PMS provision to cover input subsidies, allowing the use of not only surrogate prices but also surrogate costs. Further, the required standard of evidence to find PMS seems to have been diminished in the recent application. A widespread use of the PMS provision in such a deviant way calls for a fundamental review of the current trade remedy rules of the WTO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Environmental and Economic Impact of Trade between South Korea and the United State The Structure and Evolution of Renewable Energy Trade Networks in the RCEP Region: Application of SNA Method Assessing the Economic Impact of Covid-19 through a Counterfactual Analysis International Transmission of Macroeconomic Uncertainty in China: A Time-varying Bayesian Global SVAR Approach The Ebb and Flow of Regional Integration Vision in Asia-Pacific: From A Lens of Leaders’ Declarations over 30 Years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1