双压迫与单周围神经减压术后功能分析:回顾性研究。

The Hand Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-10 DOI:10.1177/15589447211038681
Conrad Stoy, Pedro Beredjiklian, Tyler Kreitz, Jacob Tulipan
{"title":"双压迫与单周围神经减压术后功能分析:回顾性研究。","authors":"Conrad Stoy, Pedro Beredjiklian, Tyler Kreitz, Jacob Tulipan","doi":"10.1177/15589447211038681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Double crush (DC) syndrome patients presenting with C6-7 radiculopathy and median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel report greater nerve irritability and weakness postdecompression than isolated peripheral nerve decompression. We hypothesize that patient-reported outcome is inferior following release at both cervical spine and wrist versus a single site of decompression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients that underwent either anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for C6-C7 radiculopathy, carpal tunnel release (CTR), or both within 5 years (DC) were identified. A total of 477 patients were analyzed (157 DC, 203 CTR, and 117 ACDF). Post-operative outcome Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were collected at an average of 2 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QuickDASH scores were higher in the DC group versus CTR group (36 vs 22, <i>P</i> < .0002). Postoperative disability in the ACDF group was significantly higher than the DC group (50 vs 36, <i>P</i> < .017). There were no differences between ACDF and DC groups in arm pain intensity, but the CTR group demonstrated significantly greater arm pain intensity than the DC group (5.7 vs 3.6, 10-point scale, <i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing ACDF and CTR have greater postoperative disability than those undergoing CTR alone, but less postoperative functional disability and pain than ACDF alone, indicating cervical radiculopathy may contribute a greater proportion of long-term disability postoperatively. Additionally, CTR had greater postoperative arm pain than DC patients, potentially indicating high rates of undiagnosed cervical radiculopathy or other sources of arm pain in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":76630,"journal":{"name":"The Hand","volume":"1 1","pages":"143-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Functional Analysis of Double Crush Versus Single Peripheral Nerve Decompression: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Conrad Stoy, Pedro Beredjiklian, Tyler Kreitz, Jacob Tulipan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447211038681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Double crush (DC) syndrome patients presenting with C6-7 radiculopathy and median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel report greater nerve irritability and weakness postdecompression than isolated peripheral nerve decompression. We hypothesize that patient-reported outcome is inferior following release at both cervical spine and wrist versus a single site of decompression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients that underwent either anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for C6-C7 radiculopathy, carpal tunnel release (CTR), or both within 5 years (DC) were identified. A total of 477 patients were analyzed (157 DC, 203 CTR, and 117 ACDF). Post-operative outcome Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were collected at an average of 2 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QuickDASH scores were higher in the DC group versus CTR group (36 vs 22, <i>P</i> < .0002). Postoperative disability in the ACDF group was significantly higher than the DC group (50 vs 36, <i>P</i> < .017). There were no differences between ACDF and DC groups in arm pain intensity, but the CTR group demonstrated significantly greater arm pain intensity than the DC group (5.7 vs 3.6, 10-point scale, <i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing ACDF and CTR have greater postoperative disability than those undergoing CTR alone, but less postoperative functional disability and pain than ACDF alone, indicating cervical radiculopathy may contribute a greater proportion of long-term disability postoperatively. Additionally, CTR had greater postoperative arm pain than DC patients, potentially indicating high rates of undiagnosed cervical radiculopathy or other sources of arm pain in these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hand\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"143-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786109/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447211038681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447211038681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景双重挤压(DC)综合征患者表现为C6-7神经根病和腕管正中神经压迫,与孤立的外周神经减压相比,减压后的神经易怒和虚弱程度更高。我们假设,与单一减压部位相比,患者报告的颈椎和手腕松解后的结果较差。方法确定5年内接受颈前路减压融合术(ACDF)治疗C6-C7神经根病、腕管松解术(CTR)或两者兼有的患者。共分析了477名患者(157名DC、203名CTR和117名ACDF)。术后结果收集平均术后2年手臂、肩膀和手部残疾(QuickDASH)、颈部残疾指数和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。结果DC组的uickDASH评分高于CTR组(36vs22,P<.0002)。ACDF组的术后残疾显著高于DC组(50vs36,P<.017),但CTR组的手臂疼痛强度明显高于DC组(5.7 vs 3.6,10分制,P<0.01),表明神经根型颈椎病可能在术后长期残疾中占更大比例。此外,CTR比DC患者术后手臂疼痛更大,这可能表明这些患者中未确诊的神经根型颈椎病或其他手臂疼痛源的发生率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative Functional Analysis of Double Crush Versus Single Peripheral Nerve Decompression: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Double crush (DC) syndrome patients presenting with C6-7 radiculopathy and median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel report greater nerve irritability and weakness postdecompression than isolated peripheral nerve decompression. We hypothesize that patient-reported outcome is inferior following release at both cervical spine and wrist versus a single site of decompression.

Methods: Patients that underwent either anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for C6-C7 radiculopathy, carpal tunnel release (CTR), or both within 5 years (DC) were identified. A total of 477 patients were analyzed (157 DC, 203 CTR, and 117 ACDF). Post-operative outcome Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were collected at an average of 2 years postoperatively.

Results: QuickDASH scores were higher in the DC group versus CTR group (36 vs 22, P < .0002). Postoperative disability in the ACDF group was significantly higher than the DC group (50 vs 36, P < .017). There were no differences between ACDF and DC groups in arm pain intensity, but the CTR group demonstrated significantly greater arm pain intensity than the DC group (5.7 vs 3.6, 10-point scale, P < .01).

Conclusions: Patients undergoing ACDF and CTR have greater postoperative disability than those undergoing CTR alone, but less postoperative functional disability and pain than ACDF alone, indicating cervical radiculopathy may contribute a greater proportion of long-term disability postoperatively. Additionally, CTR had greater postoperative arm pain than DC patients, potentially indicating high rates of undiagnosed cervical radiculopathy or other sources of arm pain in these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Monteggia Fracture Outcomes: Acute to Chronic. Outcomes in Ballistic Injuries to the Hand: Fractures and Nerve/Tendon Damage as Predictors of Poor Outcomes. Predictors of Digital Amputation in Diabetic Patients With Surgically Treated Finger Infections. The Prevalence of Depression and PTSD in Adults With Surgically Managed Traumatic Upper-Extremity Amputations. Postoperative Functional Analysis of Double Crush Versus Single Peripheral Nerve Decompression: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1