法律的双重性、法律确定性与法律的正确性(公正性)

Y. Matvieieva
{"title":"法律的双重性、法律确定性与法律的正确性(公正性)","authors":"Y. Matvieieva","doi":"10.18523/2617-2607.2021.8.34-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the importance of combining the moral basis and the formal content in the nature of law. The practical significance of German legal philosopher Robert Alexy’s theory of the dual nature of law is investigated. Duality presupposes that law necessarily includes both real, or factual, and ideal, or critical, dimensions. The actual dimension is represented by elements of official origin and social efficiency, while the ideal dimension is expressed in the element of moral correctness. Accordingly, the thesis of the dual nature of law presupposes non-positivism. Importance is being increasingly attached to the question of the conformity of legal certainty and correctness of the content of norms, which is connected with the principle of justice, requiring that the decisions of the authorities are morally correct. The principles of legal certainty and justice can often conflict with each other. However, no principle can displace another one under any circumstances. On the contrary, the dual nature of law requires that both of these principles be applied in correct proportionality and be balanced. And this seems possible only in the political form of democratic or discursive constitutionalism. Constitutional rights and democracy are the main elements of constitutionalism. They are mandatory in the discursive theory and both are dual in nature. Positivism has the weaknesses of legal certainty (openness of language, the presence of conflicting norms, the dynamics of social life, etc.).But they become strong arguments for the protection of human dignity, rights and freedoms. It is the orientation of the right to its further humane development, to its “humanization”, based on the need to protect people based on justice, equality and freedom, that can be an argument filling the weaknesses of legal certainty. Then, and only then, the principle of formal legal certainty of the law is transformed into legal certainty as a component of the rule of law, which characterizes the stable and civilized development of the legal framework.","PeriodicalId":34101,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual Nature of Law, Legal Certainty and Correctness (Justice) of Law\",\"authors\":\"Y. Matvieieva\",\"doi\":\"10.18523/2617-2607.2021.8.34-41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article reveals the importance of combining the moral basis and the formal content in the nature of law. The practical significance of German legal philosopher Robert Alexy’s theory of the dual nature of law is investigated. Duality presupposes that law necessarily includes both real, or factual, and ideal, or critical, dimensions. The actual dimension is represented by elements of official origin and social efficiency, while the ideal dimension is expressed in the element of moral correctness. Accordingly, the thesis of the dual nature of law presupposes non-positivism. Importance is being increasingly attached to the question of the conformity of legal certainty and correctness of the content of norms, which is connected with the principle of justice, requiring that the decisions of the authorities are morally correct. The principles of legal certainty and justice can often conflict with each other. However, no principle can displace another one under any circumstances. On the contrary, the dual nature of law requires that both of these principles be applied in correct proportionality and be balanced. And this seems possible only in the political form of democratic or discursive constitutionalism. Constitutional rights and democracy are the main elements of constitutionalism. They are mandatory in the discursive theory and both are dual in nature. Positivism has the weaknesses of legal certainty (openness of language, the presence of conflicting norms, the dynamics of social life, etc.).But they become strong arguments for the protection of human dignity, rights and freedoms. It is the orientation of the right to its further humane development, to its “humanization”, based on the need to protect people based on justice, equality and freedom, that can be an argument filling the weaknesses of legal certainty. Then, and only then, the principle of formal legal certainty of the law is transformed into legal certainty as a component of the rule of law, which characterizes the stable and civilized development of the legal framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2021.8.34-41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2021.8.34-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文揭示了法律性质中道德基础与形式内容相结合的重要性。探讨了德国法律哲学家罗伯特·阿莱西的法律双重性理论的现实意义。二元性的前提是法律必然包括真实的或事实的、理想的或批判性的维度。实际维度由官方来源和社会效率元素表示,而理想维度则由道德正确元素表示。因此,法律的双重性命题以非实证主义为前提。人们越来越重视法律确定性的一致性和规范内容的正确性问题,这与正义原则有关,要求当局的决定在道德上是正确的。法律确定性原则和正义原则往往会相互冲突。然而,在任何情况下,任何原则都不能取代另一项原则。相反,法律的双重性质要求这两项原则都以正确的比例适用并保持平衡。这似乎只有在民主宪政或散漫宪政的政治形式下才有可能。宪法权利和民主是宪政的主要组成部分。它们在话语理论中是强制性的,并且在本质上都是双重的。实证主义具有法律确定性的弱点(语言的开放性、相互冲突的规范的存在、社会生活的动态等)。但它们成为保护人类尊严、权利和自由的有力论据。这是权利的进一步人道发展方向,是权利的“人性化”方向,基于在正义、平等和自由的基础上保护人民的需要,这可以成为填补法律确定性弱点的一个论点。然后,也只有到那时,法律的形式法律确定性原则才转变为作为法治组成部分的法律确定性,这是法律框架稳定和文明发展的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dual Nature of Law, Legal Certainty and Correctness (Justice) of Law
The article reveals the importance of combining the moral basis and the formal content in the nature of law. The practical significance of German legal philosopher Robert Alexy’s theory of the dual nature of law is investigated. Duality presupposes that law necessarily includes both real, or factual, and ideal, or critical, dimensions. The actual dimension is represented by elements of official origin and social efficiency, while the ideal dimension is expressed in the element of moral correctness. Accordingly, the thesis of the dual nature of law presupposes non-positivism. Importance is being increasingly attached to the question of the conformity of legal certainty and correctness of the content of norms, which is connected with the principle of justice, requiring that the decisions of the authorities are morally correct. The principles of legal certainty and justice can often conflict with each other. However, no principle can displace another one under any circumstances. On the contrary, the dual nature of law requires that both of these principles be applied in correct proportionality and be balanced. And this seems possible only in the political form of democratic or discursive constitutionalism. Constitutional rights and democracy are the main elements of constitutionalism. They are mandatory in the discursive theory and both are dual in nature. Positivism has the weaknesses of legal certainty (openness of language, the presence of conflicting norms, the dynamics of social life, etc.).But they become strong arguments for the protection of human dignity, rights and freedoms. It is the orientation of the right to its further humane development, to its “humanization”, based on the need to protect people based on justice, equality and freedom, that can be an argument filling the weaknesses of legal certainty. Then, and only then, the principle of formal legal certainty of the law is transformed into legal certainty as a component of the rule of law, which characterizes the stable and civilized development of the legal framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perspectives for the Application of Remote Justice after COVID-19 Pandemic The Rule of Law and the Welfare State: The Ways to Overcome Contradictions Concept of Guidelines of Release from Punishment EU Law in Non-EU Countries: Reflections on Ukrainian Supreme Court’s Jurisprudence on Energy Matters Situation Model of the Next Stage of Court Proceedings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1