缝线锚钉插入角度对跟骨拔出强度的影响:挑战死人角

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Specialist Pub Date : 2017-10-01 DOI:10.1177/1938640016679705
W. Weiss, Ramon P. Saucedo, John D. Robinson, Chung-Chieh Jason Lo, Randal P. Morris, V. Panchbhavi
{"title":"缝线锚钉插入角度对跟骨拔出强度的影响:挑战死人角","authors":"W. Weiss, Ramon P. Saucedo, John D. Robinson, Chung-Chieh Jason Lo, Randal P. Morris, V. Panchbhavi","doi":"10.1177/1938640016679705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Refractory cases of Achilles tendinopathy amenable to surgery may include reattachment of the tendon using suture anchors. However, there is paucity of information describing the optimal insertion angle to maximize the tendon footprint and anchor stability in the calcaneus. The purpose of this investigation is to compare the fixation strength of suture anchors inserted at 90° and 45° (the Deadman’s angle) relative to the primary compressive trabeculae of the calcaneus. Methods. A total of 12 matched pairs of adult cadaveric calcanei were excised and potted to approximate their alignment in vivo. Each pair was implanted with 5.5-mm bioabsorbable suture anchors placed either perpendicular (90°) or oblique (45°) to the primary compressive trabeculae. A tensile load was applied until failure of anchor fixation. Differences in failure load and stiffness between anchor fixation angles were determined by paired t-tests. Results. No significant differences were detected between perpendicular and oblique suture anchor insertion relative to primary compressive trabeculae in terms of load to failure or stiffness. Conclusion. This investigation suggests that the fixation strength of suture anchors inserted perpendicular to the primary compression trabeculae and at the Deadman’s angle are possibly comparable. Levels of Evidence: Biomechanical comparison study","PeriodicalId":39271,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","volume":"10 1","pages":"411 - 414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640016679705","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Suture Anchor Insertion Angle on Calcaneus Pullout Strength: Challenging the Deadman’s Angle\",\"authors\":\"W. Weiss, Ramon P. Saucedo, John D. Robinson, Chung-Chieh Jason Lo, Randal P. Morris, V. Panchbhavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1938640016679705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Refractory cases of Achilles tendinopathy amenable to surgery may include reattachment of the tendon using suture anchors. However, there is paucity of information describing the optimal insertion angle to maximize the tendon footprint and anchor stability in the calcaneus. The purpose of this investigation is to compare the fixation strength of suture anchors inserted at 90° and 45° (the Deadman’s angle) relative to the primary compressive trabeculae of the calcaneus. Methods. A total of 12 matched pairs of adult cadaveric calcanei were excised and potted to approximate their alignment in vivo. Each pair was implanted with 5.5-mm bioabsorbable suture anchors placed either perpendicular (90°) or oblique (45°) to the primary compressive trabeculae. A tensile load was applied until failure of anchor fixation. Differences in failure load and stiffness between anchor fixation angles were determined by paired t-tests. Results. No significant differences were detected between perpendicular and oblique suture anchor insertion relative to primary compressive trabeculae in terms of load to failure or stiffness. Conclusion. This investigation suggests that the fixation strength of suture anchors inserted perpendicular to the primary compression trabeculae and at the Deadman’s angle are possibly comparable. Levels of Evidence: Biomechanical comparison study\",\"PeriodicalId\":39271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Specialist\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"411 - 414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640016679705\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640016679705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640016679705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景可接受手术的跟腱病的难治性病例可能包括使用缝合锚重新连接肌腱。然而,很少有信息描述最佳插入角度,以最大限度地扩大跟骨中的肌腱足迹和锚固件稳定性。本研究的目的是比较在90°和45°(Deadman角)处插入的缝合锚相对于跟骨初级压缩小梁的固定强度。方法。总共切除了12对匹配的成年尸体跟骨,并对其进行盆栽,以使其在体内大致对齐。每对植入5.5mm的生物可吸收缝合锚,垂直(90°)或倾斜(45°)放置在主压缩小梁上。施加拉伸载荷直到锚固件固定失效。通过配对t检验确定锚固件固定角度之间的破坏载荷和刚度差异。后果相对于初级压缩小梁,垂直和倾斜缝合锚钉插入之间在失效负荷或刚度方面没有发现显著差异。结论这项研究表明,垂直于主压缩小梁和Deadman角插入的缝合锚的固定强度可能相当。证据水平:生物力学比较研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Suture Anchor Insertion Angle on Calcaneus Pullout Strength: Challenging the Deadman’s Angle
Background. Refractory cases of Achilles tendinopathy amenable to surgery may include reattachment of the tendon using suture anchors. However, there is paucity of information describing the optimal insertion angle to maximize the tendon footprint and anchor stability in the calcaneus. The purpose of this investigation is to compare the fixation strength of suture anchors inserted at 90° and 45° (the Deadman’s angle) relative to the primary compressive trabeculae of the calcaneus. Methods. A total of 12 matched pairs of adult cadaveric calcanei were excised and potted to approximate their alignment in vivo. Each pair was implanted with 5.5-mm bioabsorbable suture anchors placed either perpendicular (90°) or oblique (45°) to the primary compressive trabeculae. A tensile load was applied until failure of anchor fixation. Differences in failure load and stiffness between anchor fixation angles were determined by paired t-tests. Results. No significant differences were detected between perpendicular and oblique suture anchor insertion relative to primary compressive trabeculae in terms of load to failure or stiffness. Conclusion. This investigation suggests that the fixation strength of suture anchors inserted perpendicular to the primary compression trabeculae and at the Deadman’s angle are possibly comparable. Levels of Evidence: Biomechanical comparison study
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Specialist
Foot and Ankle Specialist Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
期刊最新文献
Are SER-II Ankle Fractures Anatomic? Computed Tomography Demonstrates Mortise Malalignment in the Setting of Apparently Normal Radiographs. Sleep Apnea and Postoperative Medical Complications and Health Care Expenditures Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures. Utilization of the Modified Lapidus Procedure for Correction of Moderate to Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity With Increased Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle. Modified Bösch Osteotomy Combined With a Percutaneous Adductor Tendon Release for the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity: Learning Curve. Outcomes Following Repeat Ankle Arthroscopy and Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1