{"title":"重新定义公共教育权","authors":"Vivi R. Besteman","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2022.866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The failure to recognize education as a fundamental constitutional right has meant that the quality of education in public schools varies greatly depending on where students live. This Note analyzes the origins of education litigation, current state constitutional standards for education quality, and previous arguments in support of a federal constitutional right to education. It then examines two recent cases, A.C. v. Raimondo and Gary B. v. Whitmer, and advocates for their novel stance on education rights: education is an implicit right that allows students to become meaningful participants in democracy.","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redefining the Right to Public Education\",\"authors\":\"Vivi R. Besteman\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/lawreview.2022.866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The failure to recognize education as a fundamental constitutional right has meant that the quality of education in public schools varies greatly depending on where students live. This Note analyzes the origins of education litigation, current state constitutional standards for education quality, and previous arguments in support of a federal constitutional right to education. It then examines two recent cases, A.C. v. Raimondo and Gary B. v. Whitmer, and advocates for their novel stance on education rights: education is an implicit right that allows students to become meaningful participants in democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pittsburgh Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pittsburgh Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.866\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.866","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于不承认教育是一项基本的宪法权利,公立学校的教育质量因学生居住的地方而有很大差异。本文分析了教育诉讼的起源,现行州宪法对教育质量的标准,以及以前支持联邦宪法教育权的论点。然后,它研究了最近的两个案例,A.C.诉雷蒙多(Raimondo)和加里·b·诉惠特默(Gary B. v. Whitmer),并倡导他们对教育权的新立场:教育是一项隐含的权利,它允许学生成为民主的有意义的参与者。
The failure to recognize education as a fundamental constitutional right has meant that the quality of education in public schools varies greatly depending on where students live. This Note analyzes the origins of education litigation, current state constitutional standards for education quality, and previous arguments in support of a federal constitutional right to education. It then examines two recent cases, A.C. v. Raimondo and Gary B. v. Whitmer, and advocates for their novel stance on education rights: education is an implicit right that allows students to become meaningful participants in democracy.
期刊介绍:
The Law Review is a student-run journal of legal scholarship that publishes quarterly. Our goal is to contribute to the legal community by featuring pertinent articles that highlight current legal issues and changes in the law. The Law Review publishes articles, comments, book reviews, and notes on a wide variety of topics, including constitutional law, securities regulation, criminal procedure, family law, international law, and jurisprudence. The Law Review has also hosted several symposia, bringing scholars into one setting for lively debate and discussion of key legal topics.