重新定义公共教育权

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 LAW University of Pittsburgh Law Review Pub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI:10.5195/lawreview.2022.866
Vivi R. Besteman
{"title":"重新定义公共教育权","authors":"Vivi R. Besteman","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2022.866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The failure to recognize education as a fundamental constitutional right has meant that the quality of education in public schools varies greatly depending on where students live. This Note analyzes the origins of education litigation, current state constitutional standards for education quality, and previous arguments in support of a federal constitutional right to education. It then examines two recent cases, A.C. v. Raimondo and Gary B. v. Whitmer, and advocates for their novel stance on education rights: education is an implicit right that allows students to become meaningful participants in democracy.","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redefining the Right to Public Education\",\"authors\":\"Vivi R. Besteman\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/lawreview.2022.866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The failure to recognize education as a fundamental constitutional right has meant that the quality of education in public schools varies greatly depending on where students live. This Note analyzes the origins of education litigation, current state constitutional standards for education quality, and previous arguments in support of a federal constitutional right to education. It then examines two recent cases, A.C. v. Raimondo and Gary B. v. Whitmer, and advocates for their novel stance on education rights: education is an implicit right that allows students to become meaningful participants in democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pittsburgh Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pittsburgh Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.866\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.866","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于不承认教育是一项基本的宪法权利,公立学校的教育质量因学生居住的地方而有很大差异。本文分析了教育诉讼的起源,现行州宪法对教育质量的标准,以及以前支持联邦宪法教育权的论点。然后,它研究了最近的两个案例,A.C.诉雷蒙多(Raimondo)和加里·b·诉惠特默(Gary B. v. Whitmer),并倡导他们对教育权的新立场:教育是一项隐含的权利,它允许学生成为民主的有意义的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Redefining the Right to Public Education
The failure to recognize education as a fundamental constitutional right has meant that the quality of education in public schools varies greatly depending on where students live. This Note analyzes the origins of education litigation, current state constitutional standards for education quality, and previous arguments in support of a federal constitutional right to education. It then examines two recent cases, A.C. v. Raimondo and Gary B. v. Whitmer, and advocates for their novel stance on education rights: education is an implicit right that allows students to become meaningful participants in democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Law Review is a student-run journal of legal scholarship that publishes quarterly. Our goal is to contribute to the legal community by featuring pertinent articles that highlight current legal issues and changes in the law. The Law Review publishes articles, comments, book reviews, and notes on a wide variety of topics, including constitutional law, securities regulation, criminal procedure, family law, international law, and jurisprudence. The Law Review has also hosted several symposia, bringing scholars into one setting for lively debate and discussion of key legal topics.
期刊最新文献
The Ninth Amendment: The "Hard Problem" of U.S. Constitutional Law Criminal Justice Technology and the Regulatory Sandbox: Toward Balancing Justice, Accountability, and Innovation From Past to Present: Funding the Pennsylvania Public Education System The Federal Courts Are Not Bias Free Zones: An Argument for Eliminating Diversity Jurisdiction Urgenda vs. Juliana: Lessons for Future Climate Change Litigation Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1