敏捷软件开发团队中的固定因素

IF 1.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.2478/fcds-2023-0001
Klara Borowa, Sebastian Kamoda, P. Ogrodnik, A. Zalewski
{"title":"敏捷软件开发团队中的固定因素","authors":"Klara Borowa, Sebastian Kamoda, P. Ogrodnik, A. Zalewski","doi":"10.2478/fcds-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cognitive biases influence every human being, including the individuals that take part in the software development process. Fixation is a cognitive bias that occurs when one focuses too much on certain items, events, obstacles or activities. In this study, we examine whether agile team members fixate on any particular agile practices. Through a set of semi-structured interviews, we investigated the source of these fixations, their consequences, and then propose possible countermeasures. We found that practitioners tend to fixate on practices that give them a sense of being in control over the project (such as meetings or Scrum events), while neglecting the Agile Principles of self-organising teams and working at a sustainable pace. This resulted in a series of problems, such as futile attempts to control team members, oversharing information with the client, meetings becoming a form of interrogation, and others.","PeriodicalId":42909,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences","volume":"48 1","pages":"3 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fixations in Agile Software Development Teams\",\"authors\":\"Klara Borowa, Sebastian Kamoda, P. Ogrodnik, A. Zalewski\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/fcds-2023-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Cognitive biases influence every human being, including the individuals that take part in the software development process. Fixation is a cognitive bias that occurs when one focuses too much on certain items, events, obstacles or activities. In this study, we examine whether agile team members fixate on any particular agile practices. Through a set of semi-structured interviews, we investigated the source of these fixations, their consequences, and then propose possible countermeasures. We found that practitioners tend to fixate on practices that give them a sense of being in control over the project (such as meetings or Scrum events), while neglecting the Agile Principles of self-organising teams and working at a sustainable pace. This resulted in a series of problems, such as futile attempts to control team members, oversharing information with the client, meetings becoming a form of interrogation, and others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2023-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知偏差影响着每一个人,包括参与软件开发过程的个体。固着是一种认知偏见,当一个人过于关注某些物品、事件、障碍或活动时,就会出现这种偏见。在这项研究中,我们考察了敏捷团队成员是否专注于任何特定的敏捷实践。通过一组半结构化访谈,我们调查了这些固着的来源,他们的后果,然后提出可能的对策。我们发现实践者倾向于关注那些给他们一种控制项目的感觉的实践(比如会议或Scrum事件),而忽略了自组织团队和以可持续的速度工作的敏捷原则。这导致了一系列问题,比如徒劳地试图控制团队成员,与客户过度共享信息,会议变成了一种审讯形式,等等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fixations in Agile Software Development Teams
Abstract Cognitive biases influence every human being, including the individuals that take part in the software development process. Fixation is a cognitive bias that occurs when one focuses too much on certain items, events, obstacles or activities. In this study, we examine whether agile team members fixate on any particular agile practices. Through a set of semi-structured interviews, we investigated the source of these fixations, their consequences, and then propose possible countermeasures. We found that practitioners tend to fixate on practices that give them a sense of being in control over the project (such as meetings or Scrum events), while neglecting the Agile Principles of self-organising teams and working at a sustainable pace. This resulted in a series of problems, such as futile attempts to control team members, oversharing information with the client, meetings becoming a form of interrogation, and others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
16
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
A DNA Algorithm for Calculating the Maximum Flow of a Network Traceability of Architectural Design Decisions and Software Artifacts: A Systematic Mapping Study Traveling salesman problem parallelization by solving clustered subproblems Towards automated recommendations for drunk driving penalties in Poland - a case study analysis in selected court Designing a Tri-Objective, Sustainable, Closed-Loop, and Multi-Echelon Supply Chain During the COVID-19 and Lockdowns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1