从女权主义尊严的角度审视小额信贷自助团体

IF 1.4 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Oxford Development Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-20 DOI:10.1080/13600818.2022.2038118
Annabel Dulhunty
{"title":"从女权主义尊严的角度审视小额信贷自助团体","authors":"Annabel Dulhunty","doi":"10.1080/13600818.2022.2038118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite decades of controversy, microcredit initiatives continue to be championed by government aid agencies as a ‘win-win’ for both international development and women’s empowerment, bolstered by ideas of ‘smart economics.’ Most scholarship critiques these programs from a Marxist or poststructuralist perspective. This article instead investigates microcredit programming through the lens of feminist dignity and demonstrates the use of a framework founded on this idea. By using this framework to interrogate evidence from in-depth qualitative field research in West Bengal, India, this article argues that a focus on feminist dignity can improve women’s agency and wellbeing.","PeriodicalId":51612,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Development Studies","volume":"50 1","pages":"307 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining microcredit self-help groups through the lens of feminist dignity\",\"authors\":\"Annabel Dulhunty\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13600818.2022.2038118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Despite decades of controversy, microcredit initiatives continue to be championed by government aid agencies as a ‘win-win’ for both international development and women’s empowerment, bolstered by ideas of ‘smart economics.’ Most scholarship critiques these programs from a Marxist or poststructuralist perspective. This article instead investigates microcredit programming through the lens of feminist dignity and demonstrates the use of a framework founded on this idea. By using this framework to interrogate evidence from in-depth qualitative field research in West Bengal, India, this article argues that a focus on feminist dignity can improve women’s agency and wellbeing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"307 - 320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2022.2038118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2022.2038118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管存在数十年的争议,政府援助机构仍然支持小额信贷倡议,认为这是国际发展和妇女赋权的“双赢”,并受到“聪明经济学”理念的支持。大多数学术研究都是从马克思主义或后结构主义的角度来批评这些项目的。本文通过女权主义尊严的视角来研究小额信贷规划,并展示了基于这一理念的框架的使用。通过使用这一框架对来自印度西孟加拉邦的深入定性实地研究的证据进行询问,本文认为关注女权主义尊严可以改善妇女的能力性和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining microcredit self-help groups through the lens of feminist dignity
ABSTRACT Despite decades of controversy, microcredit initiatives continue to be championed by government aid agencies as a ‘win-win’ for both international development and women’s empowerment, bolstered by ideas of ‘smart economics.’ Most scholarship critiques these programs from a Marxist or poststructuralist perspective. This article instead investigates microcredit programming through the lens of feminist dignity and demonstrates the use of a framework founded on this idea. By using this framework to interrogate evidence from in-depth qualitative field research in West Bengal, India, this article argues that a focus on feminist dignity can improve women’s agency and wellbeing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oxford Development Studies
Oxford Development Studies DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Oxford Development Studies is a multidisciplinary academic journal aimed at the student, research and policy-making community, which provides a forum for rigorous and critical analysis of conventional theories and policy issues in all aspects of development, and aims to contribute to new approaches. It covers a number of disciplines related to development, including economics, history, politics, anthropology and sociology, and will publish quantitative papers as well as surveys of literature.
期刊最新文献
Social equity and care for the earth: tensions and synergies in Latin America Non-contributory social protection for adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: a review of government programmes and impacts Social conflicts over the use of water resources in Chile: the role of social movements and business power ODS lecture, development studies association 2023 stories from the Global South: the interplay of climate science, ‘action’ and the implications for development Inequality in environmental risk exposure and procedural justice in the Matanza-Riachuelo River Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1