木材建造:走向替代材料史

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE Architectural Theory Review Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/13264826.2021.1981025
Laila Seewang, Irina Davidovici
{"title":"木材建造:走向替代材料史","authors":"Laila Seewang, Irina Davidovici","doi":"10.1080/13264826.2021.1981025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1852, a hunter called Augustus T. Dowd came across a grove of Giant Sequoias in the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California. The find aroused sufficient public curiosity for prospectors to see an opportunity. In 1856, the second largest among the trees, recorded at circa one hundred metres in height and twenty-eight metres in diameter, was covered in scaffolding and stripped of its bark up to a height of thirty-five metres. A total of sixty tonnes of bark sections, 2.4 metres high and on average twenty-eight centimetres thick, was shipped to New York and exhibited as a reconstituted, crownless, trunk. This structure was later reassembled inside London’s Crystal Palace, which itself, disassembled after the 1851 Great Exhibition, had been rebuilt as a permanent attraction in Sydenham (fig. 1). There, the hollow redwood remained on display until its destruction, along with much of the central nave of the Palace, in a fire in 1866. By that time, back in California, the partially de-barked tree had stopped growing foliage (fig. 2). Its base unprotected, it eventually burnt down in a wildfire in 1908. A 2500-year-old giant tree perished within six decades—not, presumably, of its first encounter with the human race, but following its violent incorporation into the flows of interests, finance, technology, and greed associated with colonisation, industrialisation, and associated cultural production. The scattering of its parts thousands of miles away from its original location traced these currents faithfully enough. The lack of protection that destroyed the tree was both concrete, following the removal, transportation, and commodification of its protective layer, and abstract: as so often witnessed in history, the public outcry that followed its destruction formed the basis of laws for the protection of the natural environment that are still in force today. Not that humans can always claim learning from their historical mistakes. Worldwide, the current destruction of forests amply illustrates the same disregard for the natural world, with ominous consequences for our own survival as species. This sorry tale tells us more than the strange parallelism of architecture and exploited nature, the hollow Giant Sequoia and its short-lived shelter, the Crystal Palace. Both of these monumental structures, man-made and man-appropriated, were moved from their original location, consumed and turned into surplus. Timber, as part of a global mercantile exchange network, had of course previously been incorporated into these economic flows for centuries. But in the 1850s, these mediating flows are","PeriodicalId":43786,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Theory Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timber Constructed: Towards an Alternative Material History\",\"authors\":\"Laila Seewang, Irina Davidovici\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13264826.2021.1981025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1852, a hunter called Augustus T. Dowd came across a grove of Giant Sequoias in the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California. The find aroused sufficient public curiosity for prospectors to see an opportunity. In 1856, the second largest among the trees, recorded at circa one hundred metres in height and twenty-eight metres in diameter, was covered in scaffolding and stripped of its bark up to a height of thirty-five metres. A total of sixty tonnes of bark sections, 2.4 metres high and on average twenty-eight centimetres thick, was shipped to New York and exhibited as a reconstituted, crownless, trunk. This structure was later reassembled inside London’s Crystal Palace, which itself, disassembled after the 1851 Great Exhibition, had been rebuilt as a permanent attraction in Sydenham (fig. 1). There, the hollow redwood remained on display until its destruction, along with much of the central nave of the Palace, in a fire in 1866. By that time, back in California, the partially de-barked tree had stopped growing foliage (fig. 2). Its base unprotected, it eventually burnt down in a wildfire in 1908. A 2500-year-old giant tree perished within six decades—not, presumably, of its first encounter with the human race, but following its violent incorporation into the flows of interests, finance, technology, and greed associated with colonisation, industrialisation, and associated cultural production. The scattering of its parts thousands of miles away from its original location traced these currents faithfully enough. The lack of protection that destroyed the tree was both concrete, following the removal, transportation, and commodification of its protective layer, and abstract: as so often witnessed in history, the public outcry that followed its destruction formed the basis of laws for the protection of the natural environment that are still in force today. Not that humans can always claim learning from their historical mistakes. Worldwide, the current destruction of forests amply illustrates the same disregard for the natural world, with ominous consequences for our own survival as species. This sorry tale tells us more than the strange parallelism of architecture and exploited nature, the hollow Giant Sequoia and its short-lived shelter, the Crystal Palace. Both of these monumental structures, man-made and man-appropriated, were moved from their original location, consumed and turned into surplus. Timber, as part of a global mercantile exchange network, had of course previously been incorporated into these economic flows for centuries. But in the 1850s, these mediating flows are\",\"PeriodicalId\":43786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architectural Theory Review\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architectural Theory Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2021.1981025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Theory Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2021.1981025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1852年,一位名叫奥古斯都·T·多德的猎人在加利福尼亚州内华达山脉发现了一片巨型红杉林。这一发现激起了公众足够的好奇心,让探矿者看到了一个机会。1856年,记录在案的第二大树木高约100米,直径约28米,被脚手架覆盖,树皮被剥去,高达35米。共有60吨高2.4米、平均28厘米厚的树皮被运往纽约,并作为一个重建的无冠树干展出。这座建筑后来在伦敦水晶宫内重新组装,水晶宫本身在1851年的大展览后被拆除,并被重建为锡德纳姆的一个永久景点(图1)。在那里,中空的红木一直在展出,直到1866年的一场大火中,它和宫殿的大部分中殿一起被毁。到那时,回到加利福尼亚州,这棵部分树皮脱落的树已经停止了落叶(图2)。它的基地没有受到保护,最终在1908年的一场野火中被烧毁。一棵有2500年历史的大树在60年内死亡——据推测,这不是它第一次与人类相遇,而是在它暴力融入与殖民、工业化和相关文化生产相关的利益、金融、技术和贪婪流之后。它的部分分散在距离原始位置数千英里的地方,足以忠实地追踪到这些洋流。在保护层被移除、运输和商品化后,破坏这棵树的缺乏保护既是具体的,也是抽象的:正如历史上经常看到的那样,破坏后的公众抗议构成了保护自然环境的法律的基础,这些法律至今仍然有效。并不是说人类总是可以声称从他们的历史错误中吸取教训。在世界范围内,目前对森林的破坏充分表明了对自然世界的同样漠视,给我们作为物种的生存带来了不祥的后果。这个令人遗憾的故事告诉我们的不仅仅是建筑与被剥削的自然、中空的巨型红杉及其短暂的避难所水晶宫之间奇怪的相似之处。这两座纪念性建筑,无论是人造的还是人为占用的,都被从原来的位置移走,消耗殆尽,变成了盈余。木材作为全球商业交换网络的一部分,几个世纪以来一直被纳入这些经济流中。但在19世纪50年代,这些中介流动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Timber Constructed: Towards an Alternative Material History
In 1852, a hunter called Augustus T. Dowd came across a grove of Giant Sequoias in the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California. The find aroused sufficient public curiosity for prospectors to see an opportunity. In 1856, the second largest among the trees, recorded at circa one hundred metres in height and twenty-eight metres in diameter, was covered in scaffolding and stripped of its bark up to a height of thirty-five metres. A total of sixty tonnes of bark sections, 2.4 metres high and on average twenty-eight centimetres thick, was shipped to New York and exhibited as a reconstituted, crownless, trunk. This structure was later reassembled inside London’s Crystal Palace, which itself, disassembled after the 1851 Great Exhibition, had been rebuilt as a permanent attraction in Sydenham (fig. 1). There, the hollow redwood remained on display until its destruction, along with much of the central nave of the Palace, in a fire in 1866. By that time, back in California, the partially de-barked tree had stopped growing foliage (fig. 2). Its base unprotected, it eventually burnt down in a wildfire in 1908. A 2500-year-old giant tree perished within six decades—not, presumably, of its first encounter with the human race, but following its violent incorporation into the flows of interests, finance, technology, and greed associated with colonisation, industrialisation, and associated cultural production. The scattering of its parts thousands of miles away from its original location traced these currents faithfully enough. The lack of protection that destroyed the tree was both concrete, following the removal, transportation, and commodification of its protective layer, and abstract: as so often witnessed in history, the public outcry that followed its destruction formed the basis of laws for the protection of the natural environment that are still in force today. Not that humans can always claim learning from their historical mistakes. Worldwide, the current destruction of forests amply illustrates the same disregard for the natural world, with ominous consequences for our own survival as species. This sorry tale tells us more than the strange parallelism of architecture and exploited nature, the hollow Giant Sequoia and its short-lived shelter, the Crystal Palace. Both of these monumental structures, man-made and man-appropriated, were moved from their original location, consumed and turned into surplus. Timber, as part of a global mercantile exchange network, had of course previously been incorporated into these economic flows for centuries. But in the 1850s, these mediating flows are
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Untimely Teachers: Recovering Postmodernism’s Anachronic Pedagogies Global Semperian Tectonics Visual Culture and Post-War Reconstruction Charles W. Moore and the Uses of History Building Knowledge: Constructing Technoscientific Infrastructures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1