维果茨基作品中“Smysl”范畴的两个发展历程

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-07-04 DOI:10.1080/10611967.2021.2000313
Ekaterina Yu. Zavershneva
{"title":"维果茨基作品中“Smysl”范畴的两个发展历程","authors":"Ekaterina Yu. Zavershneva","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.2000313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article analyzes the background and dynamics of Lev S. Vygotsky’s notions of smysl (“sense,” “meaning,” “significance,” “purpose,” “essence”—all in one). Drawing on the data of archival records, the author has reconstructed the two main courses taken by the category “smysl” in its development: (1) within the bounds of a field metaphor, also used in the development of the “meaningful field” construct, and (2) as part of the interpretation of smysl as an integral characteristic of man’s attitude to the external world. Vygotsky’s theoretical projects are being compared to the experimental studies of his team conducted in the early 1930s. The author demonstrates that the discursive field of Vygotsky’s conception, which was determined by the category “smysl,” had a complex composition and was defined via a dialogue with K. Lewin’s field theory, using the method of formal-dynamic analysis and experimental techniques developed in the framework of dynamic psychology.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"303 - 325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Two Courses of Development of the Category “Smysl” in L. S. Vygotsky’s Works\",\"authors\":\"Ekaterina Yu. Zavershneva\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611967.2021.2000313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The article analyzes the background and dynamics of Lev S. Vygotsky’s notions of smysl (“sense,” “meaning,” “significance,” “purpose,” “essence”—all in one). Drawing on the data of archival records, the author has reconstructed the two main courses taken by the category “smysl” in its development: (1) within the bounds of a field metaphor, also used in the development of the “meaningful field” construct, and (2) as part of the interpretation of smysl as an integral characteristic of man’s attitude to the external world. Vygotsky’s theoretical projects are being compared to the experimental studies of his team conducted in the early 1930s. The author demonstrates that the discursive field of Vygotsky’s conception, which was determined by the category “smysl,” had a complex composition and was defined via a dialogue with K. Lewin’s field theory, using the method of formal-dynamic analysis and experimental techniques developed in the framework of dynamic psychology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"303 - 325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.2000313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.2000313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了列夫·维果茨基“意义”、“意义”和“目的”、“本质”概念形成的背景和动力。根据档案资料,作者重建了“smysl”范畴在其发展过程中所经历的两个主要过程:(1)在领域隐喻的范围内,也用于“有意义的领域”结构的发展;(2)作为解释smysl的一部分,它是人对外部世界态度的整体特征。维果茨基的理论项目正在与他的团队在20世纪30年代初进行的实验研究进行比较。作者论证了维果茨基概念的话语场是由“smysl”范畴决定的,它是一个复杂的组成部分,是通过与K·勒温的场论对话,使用形式动力学分析方法和在动力学心理学框架下发展的实验技术来定义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Two Courses of Development of the Category “Smysl” in L. S. Vygotsky’s Works
ABSTRACT The article analyzes the background and dynamics of Lev S. Vygotsky’s notions of smysl (“sense,” “meaning,” “significance,” “purpose,” “essence”—all in one). Drawing on the data of archival records, the author has reconstructed the two main courses taken by the category “smysl” in its development: (1) within the bounds of a field metaphor, also used in the development of the “meaningful field” construct, and (2) as part of the interpretation of smysl as an integral characteristic of man’s attitude to the external world. Vygotsky’s theoretical projects are being compared to the experimental studies of his team conducted in the early 1930s. The author demonstrates that the discursive field of Vygotsky’s conception, which was determined by the category “smysl,” had a complex composition and was defined via a dialogue with K. Lewin’s field theory, using the method of formal-dynamic analysis and experimental techniques developed in the framework of dynamic psychology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.
期刊最新文献
Concluding Russian Studies in Philosophy: An Eye Towards the Future The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics Variants of Images of the Future in the Work of Lev P. Karsavin Lev Karsavin: Russian Religiosity and Russian Revolution The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1