1917年的老信徒

V. Kerov
{"title":"1917年的老信徒","authors":"V. Kerov","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2019.1673047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, historians have been studying the political mood and tendencies of early-twentieth-century Old Believer communities. Some researchers support the mythologized idea that Old Believers were largely sympathetic toward the revolution (Shakhnazarov, 2002, 2004, 2007; Pyzhikov, 2013, Taranets, 2010). However, most scholars maintain that there was not a great deal of opposition to the tsarist regime among Old Believers (Seleznev, 2005, 2014; Red’kina, 2003; Latypov, 2011, among others), and argue that the largest confessions and their leaders “were closely aligned with rightwing and, in some cases, centrist parties” (Borovik, 2003, p. 20; Red’kina, 2012a, p. 17; Moniakova, 2007). On the other hand, even before the April 17, 1905, religious tolerance ukaz was issued, the internal affairs minister, Prince P.D. SviatopolkMirsky, assured Old Believers that the emperor “loved” them (Trudy Shestogo Vserossiiskogo s”ezda staroobriadtsev, 1905, p. 49). In an April 16, 1905, telegram to Moscow’s governor general, Nicholas II himself expressed “trust and heartfelt goodwill toward Old Believers, long known for their unwavering devotion to the throne” (quoted from Makarov, 1998, p. 37). On November 17, 1906, the ukaz “Concerning the","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"58 1","pages":"54 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2019.1673047","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Old Believers in 1917\",\"authors\":\"V. Kerov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611983.2019.1673047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, historians have been studying the political mood and tendencies of early-twentieth-century Old Believer communities. Some researchers support the mythologized idea that Old Believers were largely sympathetic toward the revolution (Shakhnazarov, 2002, 2004, 2007; Pyzhikov, 2013, Taranets, 2010). However, most scholars maintain that there was not a great deal of opposition to the tsarist regime among Old Believers (Seleznev, 2005, 2014; Red’kina, 2003; Latypov, 2011, among others), and argue that the largest confessions and their leaders “were closely aligned with rightwing and, in some cases, centrist parties” (Borovik, 2003, p. 20; Red’kina, 2012a, p. 17; Moniakova, 2007). On the other hand, even before the April 17, 1905, religious tolerance ukaz was issued, the internal affairs minister, Prince P.D. SviatopolkMirsky, assured Old Believers that the emperor “loved” them (Trudy Shestogo Vserossiiskogo s”ezda staroobriadtsev, 1905, p. 49). In an April 16, 1905, telegram to Moscow’s governor general, Nicholas II himself expressed “trust and heartfelt goodwill toward Old Believers, long known for their unwavering devotion to the throne” (quoted from Makarov, 1998, p. 37). On November 17, 1906, the ukaz “Concerning the\",\"PeriodicalId\":89267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian studies in history\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"54 - 77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2019.1673047\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian studies in history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2019.1673047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian studies in history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2019.1673047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,历史学家一直在研究二十世纪早期信徒社区的政治情绪和趋势。一些研究人员支持神话般的观点,即老信徒在很大程度上同情革命(Shakhnazarov,20020042007;Pyzhikov,2013,Taranets,2010)。然而,大多数学者坚持认为,旧信徒中对沙皇政权的反对并不多(Seleznev,20052014;Red'kina,2003;Latypov,2011等),并认为最大的忏悔录及其领导人“与右翼政党,在某些情况下与中间派政党紧密结盟”(Borovik,2003,20;Red'kina,2012a,17;Moniakova,2007)。另一方面,甚至在1905年4月17日发布宗教宽容ukaz之前,内政部长P.D.SviatopolkMirsky亲王就向老信徒保证,皇帝“爱”他们(Trudy Shestogo Vsserossiskogo s“ezda staroobriadtsev,1905,第49页)。在1905年4月16日给莫斯科总督的一封电报中,尼古拉二世本人表达了“对老信徒的信任和衷心的善意,他们长期以来以坚定不移地忠于王位而闻名”(引自马卡罗夫,1998年,第37页)。1906年11月17日,ukaz“关于
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Old Believers in 1917
In recent years, historians have been studying the political mood and tendencies of early-twentieth-century Old Believer communities. Some researchers support the mythologized idea that Old Believers were largely sympathetic toward the revolution (Shakhnazarov, 2002, 2004, 2007; Pyzhikov, 2013, Taranets, 2010). However, most scholars maintain that there was not a great deal of opposition to the tsarist regime among Old Believers (Seleznev, 2005, 2014; Red’kina, 2003; Latypov, 2011, among others), and argue that the largest confessions and their leaders “were closely aligned with rightwing and, in some cases, centrist parties” (Borovik, 2003, p. 20; Red’kina, 2012a, p. 17; Moniakova, 2007). On the other hand, even before the April 17, 1905, religious tolerance ukaz was issued, the internal affairs minister, Prince P.D. SviatopolkMirsky, assured Old Believers that the emperor “loved” them (Trudy Shestogo Vserossiiskogo s”ezda staroobriadtsev, 1905, p. 49). In an April 16, 1905, telegram to Moscow’s governor general, Nicholas II himself expressed “trust and heartfelt goodwill toward Old Believers, long known for their unwavering devotion to the throne” (quoted from Makarov, 1998, p. 37). On November 17, 1906, the ukaz “Concerning the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
War and Peace in “Asiatic Russia” The Russian Army in the Caucasus: A War of Private Actors Special Features and Mechanisms of Russia’s Trade and Economic Activities in Persia through Astrakhan in the First Half of the Eighteenth Century Conflict as a Resource: An Anatomy of the “Turkmen Unrest” in Khorezm, 1914–1916 Early Modern Trade in the Caspian Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1