小学体育应该外包吗?学生观点分析

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education Pub Date : 2022-11-03 DOI:10.1080/25742981.2022.2140594
Cheng Deng, R. Philpot, Maureen Legge, A. Ovens, Wayne Smith
{"title":"小学体育应该外包吗?学生观点分析","authors":"Cheng Deng, R. Philpot, Maureen Legge, A. Ovens, Wayne Smith","doi":"10.1080/25742981.2022.2140594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Primary classroom teachers are increasingly moving to the side-line as physical education (PE) is outsourced to external providers. Although there are many critiques of external providers, few studies draw on primary school students’ perspectives. This study calls on data from semi-structured focus group interviews with 24 students from four New Zealand primary schools to convey their perspectives on whom they prefer as their teachers of PE. Data were analysed through the constant comparative method within the concepts of inclusion and exclusion from the perspective of critical social justice. Three themes are presented and discussed: (1) ‘Classroom teachers are better because they know us’; (2) ‘External providers are better because they know sport’; (3) ‘Classroom teachers should teach PE; External providers should teach sport’. The findings highlight the importance of listening to students’ perspectives. We argue that classroom teachers should play a central role in teaching primary PE with assistance from external providers and HPE specialists to offer all students a socially just, inclusive, and equitable learning experience.","PeriodicalId":36887,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"357 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should primary school PE be outsourced? An analysis of students’ perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Deng, R. Philpot, Maureen Legge, A. Ovens, Wayne Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25742981.2022.2140594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Primary classroom teachers are increasingly moving to the side-line as physical education (PE) is outsourced to external providers. Although there are many critiques of external providers, few studies draw on primary school students’ perspectives. This study calls on data from semi-structured focus group interviews with 24 students from four New Zealand primary schools to convey their perspectives on whom they prefer as their teachers of PE. Data were analysed through the constant comparative method within the concepts of inclusion and exclusion from the perspective of critical social justice. Three themes are presented and discussed: (1) ‘Classroom teachers are better because they know us’; (2) ‘External providers are better because they know sport’; (3) ‘Classroom teachers should teach PE; External providers should teach sport’. The findings highlight the importance of listening to students’ perspectives. We argue that classroom teachers should play a central role in teaching primary PE with assistance from external providers and HPE specialists to offer all students a socially just, inclusive, and equitable learning experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"357 - 374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2022.2140594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2022.2140594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:随着体育教育外包给外部提供者,小学课堂教师越来越多地走到了边缘。尽管有很多对外部提供者的批评,但很少有研究借鉴小学生的观点。本研究采用半结构化焦点小组访谈的数据,对来自新西兰四所小学的24名学生进行访谈,以传达他们对谁是体育老师的看法。从批判性社会正义的角度,通过包容和排斥概念中的持续比较方法对数据进行分析。提出并讨论了三个主题:(1)“课堂教师因为了解我们而变得更好”;(2) “外部提供者更好,因为他们了解体育”;(3) “课堂老师应该教体育;外部提供者应该教授体育。研究结果强调了倾听学生观点的重要性。我们认为,在外部提供者和HPE专家的帮助下,课堂教师应在小学体育教学中发挥核心作用,为所有学生提供社会公正、包容和公平的学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Should primary school PE be outsourced? An analysis of students’ perspectives
ABSTRACT Primary classroom teachers are increasingly moving to the side-line as physical education (PE) is outsourced to external providers. Although there are many critiques of external providers, few studies draw on primary school students’ perspectives. This study calls on data from semi-structured focus group interviews with 24 students from four New Zealand primary schools to convey their perspectives on whom they prefer as their teachers of PE. Data were analysed through the constant comparative method within the concepts of inclusion and exclusion from the perspective of critical social justice. Three themes are presented and discussed: (1) ‘Classroom teachers are better because they know us’; (2) ‘External providers are better because they know sport’; (3) ‘Classroom teachers should teach PE; External providers should teach sport’. The findings highlight the importance of listening to students’ perspectives. We argue that classroom teachers should play a central role in teaching primary PE with assistance from external providers and HPE specialists to offer all students a socially just, inclusive, and equitable learning experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Physical education pedagogies for health Physical education pedagogies for health , edited by Lorraine Cale and Jo Harris, London and New York, Routledge, 2022, 142 pp., US$64.95 ISBN 978-1-003-22590-4. ‘Publicness of education’: framing possibilities for decolonising practices in Health and Physical Education Preservice teachers’ health literacy levels and perceptions of teaching capabilities: an Australian case study ‘Sometimes unfair is fair’: New Zealand HPE teachers’ perceptions of social justice Benefits of hybridising the activist approach and teaching games for understanding to empower girls in physical education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1