欧洲财政赤字预测:双重标准的证据?

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Baltic Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1406099X.2021.1888439
Jakub Rybacki
{"title":"欧洲财政赤字预测:双重标准的证据?","authors":"Jakub Rybacki","doi":"10.1080/1406099X.2021.1888439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fiscal forecasts produced by international institutions came under strong criticism after the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis due to excessive optimism. Presently, international organizations are also accused of applying a double standard. Their opponents claim they depict negative picture for populist governments. This paper evaluates forecasts provided by the IMF, European Commission and the OECD based on a panel of EU economies and selected large countries. Five years after the Sovereign debt crisis, we still find excessively optimistic forecasts for Portugal and Spain. Moreover, the EC and OECD are being indulgent to countries under the excessive deficit procedure. There is also a strong autocorrelation of forecast errors and cyclical biases – European Commission overestimates governments’ propensity to tighten fiscal policy during expansion and forecasts an overly pessimistic picture during a slowdown. However, we find no evidence suggesting that fiscal forecasts stigmatize the governments accused of populism.","PeriodicalId":43756,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Economics","volume":"21 1","pages":"26 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1406099X.2021.1888439","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiscal deficit forecasts in Europe: evidence for a double standard?\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Rybacki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1406099X.2021.1888439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Fiscal forecasts produced by international institutions came under strong criticism after the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis due to excessive optimism. Presently, international organizations are also accused of applying a double standard. Their opponents claim they depict negative picture for populist governments. This paper evaluates forecasts provided by the IMF, European Commission and the OECD based on a panel of EU economies and selected large countries. Five years after the Sovereign debt crisis, we still find excessively optimistic forecasts for Portugal and Spain. Moreover, the EC and OECD are being indulgent to countries under the excessive deficit procedure. There is also a strong autocorrelation of forecast errors and cyclical biases – European Commission overestimates governments’ propensity to tighten fiscal policy during expansion and forecasts an overly pessimistic picture during a slowdown. However, we find no evidence suggesting that fiscal forecasts stigmatize the governments accused of populism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"26 - 42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1406099X.2021.1888439\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2021.1888439\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2021.1888439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

欧元区主权债务危机后,国际机构的财政预测因过于乐观而受到强烈批评。目前,国际组织也被指责采用双重标准。他们的反对者声称他们描绘了民粹主义政府的负面形象。本文对国际货币基金组织、欧盟委员会和经合组织提供的预测进行了评估,这些预测基于欧盟经济体和选定的大国。主权债务危机爆发5年后,我们仍发现对葡萄牙和西班牙的预测过于乐观。此外,欧共体和经合发组织正在纵容过度赤字程序下的国家。预测误差和周期性偏差之间也存在很强的自相关性——欧盟委员会(European Commission)高估了各国政府在经济扩张期间收紧财政政策的倾向,而在经济放缓期间的预测则过于悲观。然而,我们没有发现任何证据表明财政预测会使被指责为民粹主义的政府蒙受耻辱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fiscal deficit forecasts in Europe: evidence for a double standard?
ABSTRACT Fiscal forecasts produced by international institutions came under strong criticism after the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis due to excessive optimism. Presently, international organizations are also accused of applying a double standard. Their opponents claim they depict negative picture for populist governments. This paper evaluates forecasts provided by the IMF, European Commission and the OECD based on a panel of EU economies and selected large countries. Five years after the Sovereign debt crisis, we still find excessively optimistic forecasts for Portugal and Spain. Moreover, the EC and OECD are being indulgent to countries under the excessive deficit procedure. There is also a strong autocorrelation of forecast errors and cyclical biases – European Commission overestimates governments’ propensity to tighten fiscal policy during expansion and forecasts an overly pessimistic picture during a slowdown. However, we find no evidence suggesting that fiscal forecasts stigmatize the governments accused of populism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Economic upgrading of Central and Eastern European economies through global value chain participation and foreign direct investment Are Poles stuck in overeducation? Individual dynamics of educational mismatch in Poland Choosing the European fiscal rule A long-run perspective on Latvian regional gross domestic product inequality, 1925–2016 The communication reaction function of the European Central Bank. An analysis using topic modelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1