波士顿自由学校是互惠综合教育的可能之地

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1017/heq.2022.42
Alyssa Napier
{"title":"波士顿自由学校是互惠综合教育的可能之地","authors":"Alyssa Napier","doi":"10.1017/heq.2022.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1963 and 1964, organizers in Boston held Freedom Stay-Outs—one-day school boycotts—to protest the neglect of predominantly Black schools from the Boston School Committee, the governing body of the Boston Public Schools. Boycotting students attended Freedom Schools, where they learned about Black history and discussed issues facing Black youth. This article examines the 1964 Stay-Out and Freedom Schools as spaces where Black educators, organizers, parents, and students developed and enacted a vision of integrated education distinct from the dominant models of integration proposed in Boston and across the nation post-Brown v. Board (1954). The 1964 Freedom Schools modeled reciprocal integration, a vision for integrated education that promotes bidirectional physical and cultural movement, rather than the dominant model of integration that moved Black children into white schools to be taught white history and culture. Reciprocal integration was developed through Black parents’ and students’ educational testimony, the Stay-Out organizers’ own educational analysis, and the practical necessity of interracial organizing.","PeriodicalId":45631,"journal":{"name":"HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Boston Freedom Schools as Places of Possibility for Reciprocal Integrated Education\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa Napier\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/heq.2022.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In 1963 and 1964, organizers in Boston held Freedom Stay-Outs—one-day school boycotts—to protest the neglect of predominantly Black schools from the Boston School Committee, the governing body of the Boston Public Schools. Boycotting students attended Freedom Schools, where they learned about Black history and discussed issues facing Black youth. This article examines the 1964 Stay-Out and Freedom Schools as spaces where Black educators, organizers, parents, and students developed and enacted a vision of integrated education distinct from the dominant models of integration proposed in Boston and across the nation post-Brown v. Board (1954). The 1964 Freedom Schools modeled reciprocal integration, a vision for integrated education that promotes bidirectional physical and cultural movement, rather than the dominant model of integration that moved Black children into white schools to be taught white history and culture. Reciprocal integration was developed through Black parents’ and students’ educational testimony, the Stay-Out organizers’ own educational analysis, and the practical necessity of interracial organizing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/heq.2022.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/heq.2022.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要1963年和1964年,波士顿的组织者举行了为期一天的学校抵制活动,抗议波士顿公立学校管理机构波士顿学校委员会忽视以黑人为主的学校。抵制学生就读于自由学校,在那里他们了解黑人历史并讨论黑人青年面临的问题。这篇文章考察了1964年的“走出去”和“自由学校”,这些学校是黑人教育工作者、组织者、家长和学生发展和实施融合教育愿景的场所,不同于布朗诉董事会案(1954年)后波士顿和全国提出的主流融合模式。1964年的自由学校以互惠融合为模式,这是一种促进双向体育和文化运动的融合教育愿景,而不是将黑人儿童转移到白人学校学习白人历史和文化的主流融合模式。互惠融合是通过黑人父母和学生的教育证词、“外出”组织者自己的教育分析以及跨种族组织的实际必要性发展起来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Boston Freedom Schools as Places of Possibility for Reciprocal Integrated Education
Abstract In 1963 and 1964, organizers in Boston held Freedom Stay-Outs—one-day school boycotts—to protest the neglect of predominantly Black schools from the Boston School Committee, the governing body of the Boston Public Schools. Boycotting students attended Freedom Schools, where they learned about Black history and discussed issues facing Black youth. This article examines the 1964 Stay-Out and Freedom Schools as spaces where Black educators, organizers, parents, and students developed and enacted a vision of integrated education distinct from the dominant models of integration proposed in Boston and across the nation post-Brown v. Board (1954). The 1964 Freedom Schools modeled reciprocal integration, a vision for integrated education that promotes bidirectional physical and cultural movement, rather than the dominant model of integration that moved Black children into white schools to be taught white history and culture. Reciprocal integration was developed through Black parents’ and students’ educational testimony, the Stay-Out organizers’ own educational analysis, and the practical necessity of interracial organizing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: History of Education Quarterly publishes topics that span the history of education, both formal and nonformal, including the history of childhood, youth, and the family. The subjects are not limited to any time period and are universal in scope.
期刊最新文献
“Isn’t It Terrible That All These Students Are Voting?”: Student Suffrage in College Towns Harold S. Wechsler and Steven J. Diner. Unwelcome Guests: A History of Access to American Higher Education Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2019. 225 pp. Campbell F. Scribner. A is for Arson: A History of Vandalism in American Education Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2023, 224 pp. Jack Schneider and Ethan Hutt. Off the Mark: How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don’t Have To) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2023. 296 pp. Eugenics, Sex and Family Life Education, and Juvenile Delinquency in Los Angeles County, California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1