{"title":"颅架在颈椎前路手术中的图像引导导航","authors":"Ahmed Rizk, Andy Ottenbacher","doi":"10.21608/ESJ.2019.6326.1080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Data: Cervicothoracic, high thoracic, and craniocervical instrumented anterior spinal procedures pose a considerable challenge to the surgeon, mainly because intraoperative imaging by fluoroscopy is inadequate. To a certain extent the surgeon can make use of 3D-fluoroscopy for intraoperative control of the implants. To ease this process, the surgeon can make use of the so-called cranial frame which is attached to the Mayfield clamp, in combination with navigated 3D-fluoroscopy. The use of the cranial frame for navigated anterior craniocervical approaches as in the case of transnasal procedures at the clivus and foramen magnum is quite widespread. In the literature, the use of this technique for spine approaches is limited to a few case reports. Purpose: To present the feasibility of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation in anterior cervical spine procedures with the use of cranial frame. Study Design: Retrospective clinical case cohort. Patients and Methods: We present our experience in the technique of navigation in 5 patients of anterior cervical spine procedures. Anterior instrumented fusion in the cervicothoracic spine was performed in 4 patients and in the last patient anterior C1/2 fixation was performed. We used a system composed of Arcadis Orbic 3D C-arm by Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany, for acquisition of 3D images and the Stealth Station system by Medtronic Inc., Louisville, USA, for navigation. We used a socalled cranial frame for navigation that is fixed to the Mayfield head holder; a preoperative 3D scan was performed in some patients. The intraoperative 3D scan was performed after removal of the retractors, and additional 3D scan was beneficial in some patients during the surgical procedure. Results: Navigation was helpful in identification of the entry points and trajectories of the screws especially in the cervicothoracic region with no need for fluoroscopy. Additional advantage of the use of this system is the possibility of performing intraoperative 3D scan after instrumentation to verify hardware placement. Conclusion: The illustrated cases demonstrate the advantages of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation with use of the cranial frame in the upper transitional zones. Disadvantages of this method are the complex intraoperative draping and logistics and the possible inaccuracy because of long distances and spinal mobility. Carbon Mayfield may facilitate positioning but is not mandatory. (2018ESJ173)","PeriodicalId":11610,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image-Guided Navigation in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery using a Cranial Frame\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Rizk, Andy Ottenbacher\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ESJ.2019.6326.1080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Data: Cervicothoracic, high thoracic, and craniocervical instrumented anterior spinal procedures pose a considerable challenge to the surgeon, mainly because intraoperative imaging by fluoroscopy is inadequate. To a certain extent the surgeon can make use of 3D-fluoroscopy for intraoperative control of the implants. To ease this process, the surgeon can make use of the so-called cranial frame which is attached to the Mayfield clamp, in combination with navigated 3D-fluoroscopy. The use of the cranial frame for navigated anterior craniocervical approaches as in the case of transnasal procedures at the clivus and foramen magnum is quite widespread. In the literature, the use of this technique for spine approaches is limited to a few case reports. Purpose: To present the feasibility of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation in anterior cervical spine procedures with the use of cranial frame. Study Design: Retrospective clinical case cohort. Patients and Methods: We present our experience in the technique of navigation in 5 patients of anterior cervical spine procedures. Anterior instrumented fusion in the cervicothoracic spine was performed in 4 patients and in the last patient anterior C1/2 fixation was performed. We used a system composed of Arcadis Orbic 3D C-arm by Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany, for acquisition of 3D images and the Stealth Station system by Medtronic Inc., Louisville, USA, for navigation. We used a socalled cranial frame for navigation that is fixed to the Mayfield head holder; a preoperative 3D scan was performed in some patients. The intraoperative 3D scan was performed after removal of the retractors, and additional 3D scan was beneficial in some patients during the surgical procedure. Results: Navigation was helpful in identification of the entry points and trajectories of the screws especially in the cervicothoracic region with no need for fluoroscopy. Additional advantage of the use of this system is the possibility of performing intraoperative 3D scan after instrumentation to verify hardware placement. Conclusion: The illustrated cases demonstrate the advantages of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation with use of the cranial frame in the upper transitional zones. Disadvantages of this method are the complex intraoperative draping and logistics and the possible inaccuracy because of long distances and spinal mobility. Carbon Mayfield may facilitate positioning but is not mandatory. (2018ESJ173)\",\"PeriodicalId\":11610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ESJ.2019.6326.1080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ESJ.2019.6326.1080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景资料:颈胸、高胸和颅颈前路器械脊柱手术对外科医生来说是一个相当大的挑战,主要是因为术中荧光透视成像不足。在一定程度上,外科医生可以利用3D荧光透视术对植入物进行术中控制。为了简化这一过程,外科医生可以使用连接在Mayfield夹具上的所谓颅骨框架,并结合导航的3D荧光镜检查。在斜坡和大孔经鼻手术的情况下,在导航的前颅颈入路中使用颅骨支架是相当普遍的。在文献中,这种技术在脊柱入路中的应用仅限于少数病例报告。目的:探讨应用颅骨支架在颈椎前路手术中进行三维透视导航的可行性。研究设计:回顾性临床病例队列。患者和方法:我们介绍了5例颈椎前路手术患者的导航技术经验。4名患者在颈胸棘内进行了前路器械融合,最后一名患者进行了C1/2前路固定。我们使用德国埃尔兰根西门子医疗解决方案公司的Arcadis Orbic 3D C型臂系统来获取3D图像,并使用美国路易斯维尔股份有限公司的Stealth Station系统来导航。我们使用了一个所谓的颅骨支架进行导航,该支架固定在Mayfield头部支架上;对一些患者进行了术前3D扫描。术中3D扫描是在取出牵开器后进行的,在手术过程中,对一些患者进行额外的3D扫描是有益的。结果:导航有助于识别螺钉的进入点和轨迹,尤其是在不需要荧光透视的颈胸区域。使用该系统的另一个优点是可以在仪器安装后进行术中3D扫描,以验证硬件放置。结论:图示病例显示了在上过渡区使用颅骨支架进行三维透视导航的优势。这种方法的缺点是复杂的术中覆盖和后勤,以及由于长距离和脊柱活动性可能导致的不准确。Carbon Mayfield可能有助于定位,但不是强制性的。(2018ESJ173)
Image-Guided Navigation in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery using a Cranial Frame
Background Data: Cervicothoracic, high thoracic, and craniocervical instrumented anterior spinal procedures pose a considerable challenge to the surgeon, mainly because intraoperative imaging by fluoroscopy is inadequate. To a certain extent the surgeon can make use of 3D-fluoroscopy for intraoperative control of the implants. To ease this process, the surgeon can make use of the so-called cranial frame which is attached to the Mayfield clamp, in combination with navigated 3D-fluoroscopy. The use of the cranial frame for navigated anterior craniocervical approaches as in the case of transnasal procedures at the clivus and foramen magnum is quite widespread. In the literature, the use of this technique for spine approaches is limited to a few case reports. Purpose: To present the feasibility of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation in anterior cervical spine procedures with the use of cranial frame. Study Design: Retrospective clinical case cohort. Patients and Methods: We present our experience in the technique of navigation in 5 patients of anterior cervical spine procedures. Anterior instrumented fusion in the cervicothoracic spine was performed in 4 patients and in the last patient anterior C1/2 fixation was performed. We used a system composed of Arcadis Orbic 3D C-arm by Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany, for acquisition of 3D images and the Stealth Station system by Medtronic Inc., Louisville, USA, for navigation. We used a socalled cranial frame for navigation that is fixed to the Mayfield head holder; a preoperative 3D scan was performed in some patients. The intraoperative 3D scan was performed after removal of the retractors, and additional 3D scan was beneficial in some patients during the surgical procedure. Results: Navigation was helpful in identification of the entry points and trajectories of the screws especially in the cervicothoracic region with no need for fluoroscopy. Additional advantage of the use of this system is the possibility of performing intraoperative 3D scan after instrumentation to verify hardware placement. Conclusion: The illustrated cases demonstrate the advantages of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation with use of the cranial frame in the upper transitional zones. Disadvantages of this method are the complex intraoperative draping and logistics and the possible inaccuracy because of long distances and spinal mobility. Carbon Mayfield may facilitate positioning but is not mandatory. (2018ESJ173)