作弊?Swing Phrasing不能单独通过显式符号指令进行通信

IF 1.3 2区 心理学 0 MUSIC Music Perception Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1525/mp.2022.39.4.386
C. Corcoran, Jan Stupacher, P. Vuust
{"title":"作弊?Swing Phrasing不能单独通过显式符号指令进行通信","authors":"C. Corcoran, Jan Stupacher, P. Vuust","doi":"10.1525/mp.2022.39.4.386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jazz musicians usually learn to play with “swing” phrasing by playing by ear. Classical musicians—who play more from musical scores than by ear—are reported to struggle with producing swing. We explored whether classical musicians play with more swing when performing from more detailed swing notation. Thereby we investigated whether a culturally specific improvisational social procedure can be scripted in detailed music notation for musicians from a different performance background. Twenty classical musicians sight-read jazz tunes from three styles of notation, each with a different level of notational complexity. Experienced jazz listeners evaluated the performances. Results showed that more score-independent classical musicians with strong aural abilities played with equally strong swing regardless of notation; more score-dependent musicians swung most with the medium-complexity classical notation. The data suggest that some higher-level swing features, such as appropriate articulation, event durations, and deviations from a beat sequence can be communicated to a limited extent using written instructions. However, their successful implementation in performance depends on matching instructional complexity to a musician’s skill at decoding and interpreting unfamiliar information. This link between decoding skills and cross-cultural performance makes our findings relevant to ethnological and musicological studies of musical communication processes and perception-action coupling.","PeriodicalId":47786,"journal":{"name":"Music Perception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Swinging the Score? Swing Phrasing Cannot Be Communicated via Explicit Notation Instructions Alone\",\"authors\":\"C. Corcoran, Jan Stupacher, P. Vuust\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/mp.2022.39.4.386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jazz musicians usually learn to play with “swing” phrasing by playing by ear. Classical musicians—who play more from musical scores than by ear—are reported to struggle with producing swing. We explored whether classical musicians play with more swing when performing from more detailed swing notation. Thereby we investigated whether a culturally specific improvisational social procedure can be scripted in detailed music notation for musicians from a different performance background. Twenty classical musicians sight-read jazz tunes from three styles of notation, each with a different level of notational complexity. Experienced jazz listeners evaluated the performances. Results showed that more score-independent classical musicians with strong aural abilities played with equally strong swing regardless of notation; more score-dependent musicians swung most with the medium-complexity classical notation. The data suggest that some higher-level swing features, such as appropriate articulation, event durations, and deviations from a beat sequence can be communicated to a limited extent using written instructions. However, their successful implementation in performance depends on matching instructional complexity to a musician’s skill at decoding and interpreting unfamiliar information. This link between decoding skills and cross-cultural performance makes our findings relevant to ethnological and musicological studies of musical communication processes and perception-action coupling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Music Perception\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Music Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2022.39.4.386\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2022.39.4.386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

爵士音乐家通常通过耳朵弹奏来学习“摇摆”短语。据报道,古典音乐家们演奏的更多的是乐谱,而不是耳朵,他们很难产生挥杆。我们从更详细的挥杆记谱中探讨了古典音乐家在表演时是否使用了更多的挥杆。因此,我们研究了一种文化特定的即兴社会程序是否可以为来自不同表演背景的音乐家编写详细的乐谱。20位古典音乐家从三种风格的记谱中视觉解读爵士乐曲调,每种风格都有不同程度的记谱复杂性。经验丰富的爵士乐听众对演出进行了评价。结果表明,更多具有较强听觉能力的独立于乐谱的古典音乐家在不考虑乐谱的情况下演奏同样强烈的摇摆;更多依赖乐谱的音乐家最喜欢中等复杂度的古典记谱法。数据表明,一些更高级别的挥杆特征,如适当的衔接、事件持续时间和与节拍序列的偏差,可以使用书面指令在有限的范围内进行沟通。然而,它们在表演中的成功实施取决于将教学复杂性与音乐家解码和解释陌生信息的技能相匹配。解码技能和跨文化表演之间的这种联系使我们的发现与音乐传播过程和感知-行动耦合的民族学和音乐学研究相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Swinging the Score? Swing Phrasing Cannot Be Communicated via Explicit Notation Instructions Alone
Jazz musicians usually learn to play with “swing” phrasing by playing by ear. Classical musicians—who play more from musical scores than by ear—are reported to struggle with producing swing. We explored whether classical musicians play with more swing when performing from more detailed swing notation. Thereby we investigated whether a culturally specific improvisational social procedure can be scripted in detailed music notation for musicians from a different performance background. Twenty classical musicians sight-read jazz tunes from three styles of notation, each with a different level of notational complexity. Experienced jazz listeners evaluated the performances. Results showed that more score-independent classical musicians with strong aural abilities played with equally strong swing regardless of notation; more score-dependent musicians swung most with the medium-complexity classical notation. The data suggest that some higher-level swing features, such as appropriate articulation, event durations, and deviations from a beat sequence can be communicated to a limited extent using written instructions. However, their successful implementation in performance depends on matching instructional complexity to a musician’s skill at decoding and interpreting unfamiliar information. This link between decoding skills and cross-cultural performance makes our findings relevant to ethnological and musicological studies of musical communication processes and perception-action coupling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Music Perception
Music Perception Multiple-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Music Perception charts the ongoing scholarly discussion and study of musical phenomena. Publishing original empirical and theoretical papers, methodological articles and critical reviews from renowned scientists and musicians, Music Perception is a repository of insightful research. The broad range of disciplines covered in the journal includes: •Psychology •Psychophysics •Linguistics •Neurology •Neurophysiology •Artificial intelligence •Computer technology •Physical and architectural acoustics •Music theory
期刊最新文献
The Perceptual and Emotional Consequences of Articulation in Music Cognitive Mechanisms in Temporally Controlled Rhythm Reading No Heightened Musical Pitch Weighting For Tone Language Speakers in Early Childhood Timbre Semantic Associations Vary Both Between and Within Instruments The Whole is Not Different From its Parts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1