基于人群的方法评估COVID-19期间的糖尿病管理:来自加拿大安大略省人口数据的见解

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Population Data Science Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2091
W. Wodchis, Yuqing Bai, L. Mondor, R. Hall
{"title":"基于人群的方法评估COVID-19期间的糖尿病管理:来自加拿大安大略省人口数据的见解","authors":"W. Wodchis, Yuqing Bai, L. Mondor, R. Hall","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveDiabetes management requires ongoing monitoring of diabetes care from primary care, specialist care and laboratory testing. COVID-19 led to changes in access to in-person care. The purpose of this research was to assess changes in the management of diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic using population-linked datasets and population segmentation. \nApproachWe identified over 1.4 Million Ontarians with diabetes (approximately 10% of the population) with valid health insurance as of April 1, 2019 and April 1, 2020. We measured 11 indicators of diabetes management including laboratory testing for HbA1c and LDL (highlighted in this abstract). With screening indicators, we examined changes in the proportion of the population up-to-date with screening at the end of each fiscal year (March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021) overall and according to population segments created using linked health data from primary care, home care, long term care and hospitals. \nResultsOverall screening rates that required laboratory testing for HbA1c and LDL fell substantially from 54% to 40% and 68% to 59% overall. Comparing across population segments, residents in Long Term Care facilities had the smallest changes in screening rates; individuals with low, medium and high complexity chronic conditions and end-of-life conditions had the largest changes; maternity, cancer, mental health and frail populations were in the middle. Differences according the primary care enrolment models (capitation vs fee-for-service) were relatively minor but patients who were not rostered to a primary care physician had the largest reductions in laboratory screening. Results for all 11 indicators will be shared in the presentation. \nConclusionCOVID-19 was associated with substantial reductions in laboratory-based diabetes screening. Poor diabetes management is one of the strongest risk-factors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19. Rates of diabetes management declined most for at risk patient populations amplifying the need to differentially connect with patients to ensure ongoing care during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A population-based approach to assessing diabetes management during COVID-19: insights from population data in Ontario, Canada.\",\"authors\":\"W. Wodchis, Yuqing Bai, L. Mondor, R. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveDiabetes management requires ongoing monitoring of diabetes care from primary care, specialist care and laboratory testing. COVID-19 led to changes in access to in-person care. The purpose of this research was to assess changes in the management of diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic using population-linked datasets and population segmentation. \\nApproachWe identified over 1.4 Million Ontarians with diabetes (approximately 10% of the population) with valid health insurance as of April 1, 2019 and April 1, 2020. We measured 11 indicators of diabetes management including laboratory testing for HbA1c and LDL (highlighted in this abstract). With screening indicators, we examined changes in the proportion of the population up-to-date with screening at the end of each fiscal year (March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021) overall and according to population segments created using linked health data from primary care, home care, long term care and hospitals. \\nResultsOverall screening rates that required laboratory testing for HbA1c and LDL fell substantially from 54% to 40% and 68% to 59% overall. Comparing across population segments, residents in Long Term Care facilities had the smallest changes in screening rates; individuals with low, medium and high complexity chronic conditions and end-of-life conditions had the largest changes; maternity, cancer, mental health and frail populations were in the middle. Differences according the primary care enrolment models (capitation vs fee-for-service) were relatively minor but patients who were not rostered to a primary care physician had the largest reductions in laboratory screening. Results for all 11 indicators will be shared in the presentation. \\nConclusionCOVID-19 was associated with substantial reductions in laboratory-based diabetes screening. Poor diabetes management is one of the strongest risk-factors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19. Rates of diabetes management declined most for at risk patient populations amplifying the need to differentially connect with patients to ensure ongoing care during the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Population Data Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Population Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的糖尿病管理需要对糖尿病护理进行持续监测,包括初级保健、专科护理和实验室检测。COVID-19导致了获得当面护理的变化。本研究的目的是利用人群相关数据集和人群细分来评估COVID-19大流行期间糖尿病管理的变化。截至2019年4月1日和2020年4月1日,我们确定了140多万患有糖尿病的安大略省人(约占人口的10%)拥有有效的健康保险。我们测量了11项糖尿病管理指标,包括HbA1c和LDL的实验室检测(在摘要中突出显示)。通过筛查指标,我们检查了每个财政年度(2020年3月31日和2021年3月31日)结束时最新筛查的人口比例的变化,并根据使用来自初级保健、家庭护理、长期护理和医院的相关健康数据创建的人口细分。结果要求实验室检测HbA1c和LDL的总体筛查率从54%下降到40%,从68%下降到59%。比较不同人群,长期护理机构的居民筛查率变化最小;低、中、高复杂性慢性疾病和生命末期疾病的个体变化最大;产妇、癌症、心理健康和虚弱人群位居中间。根据初级保健登记模式(按人头支付与按服务收费)的差异相对较小,但没有登记到初级保健医生的患者在实验室筛查方面的减少幅度最大。所有11项指标的结果将在报告中分享。结论covid -19与实验室糖尿病筛查的大幅减少有关。糖尿病管理不善是导致COVID-19不良后果的最大风险因素之一。高危患者群体的糖尿病管理率下降最多,因此需要与患者进行不同的联系,以确保大流行期间的持续护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A population-based approach to assessing diabetes management during COVID-19: insights from population data in Ontario, Canada.
ObjectiveDiabetes management requires ongoing monitoring of diabetes care from primary care, specialist care and laboratory testing. COVID-19 led to changes in access to in-person care. The purpose of this research was to assess changes in the management of diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic using population-linked datasets and population segmentation. ApproachWe identified over 1.4 Million Ontarians with diabetes (approximately 10% of the population) with valid health insurance as of April 1, 2019 and April 1, 2020. We measured 11 indicators of diabetes management including laboratory testing for HbA1c and LDL (highlighted in this abstract). With screening indicators, we examined changes in the proportion of the population up-to-date with screening at the end of each fiscal year (March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021) overall and according to population segments created using linked health data from primary care, home care, long term care and hospitals. ResultsOverall screening rates that required laboratory testing for HbA1c and LDL fell substantially from 54% to 40% and 68% to 59% overall. Comparing across population segments, residents in Long Term Care facilities had the smallest changes in screening rates; individuals with low, medium and high complexity chronic conditions and end-of-life conditions had the largest changes; maternity, cancer, mental health and frail populations were in the middle. Differences according the primary care enrolment models (capitation vs fee-for-service) were relatively minor but patients who were not rostered to a primary care physician had the largest reductions in laboratory screening. Results for all 11 indicators will be shared in the presentation. ConclusionCOVID-19 was associated with substantial reductions in laboratory-based diabetes screening. Poor diabetes management is one of the strongest risk-factors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19. Rates of diabetes management declined most for at risk patient populations amplifying the need to differentially connect with patients to ensure ongoing care during the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Defining a low-risk birth cohort: a cohort study comparing two perinatal data sets in Ontario, Canada. Data resource profile: nutrition data in the VA million veteran program. Deprivation effects on length of stay and death of hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Greater Manchester. Variation in colorectal cancer treatment and outcomes in Scotland: real world evidence from national linked administrative health data. Examining the quality and population representativeness of linked survey and administrative data: guidance and illustration using linked 1958 National Child Development Study and Hospital Episode Statistics data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1