孩子们在环境杂务方面的工作:谁说

IF 1.4 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Oxford Development Studies Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1080/13600818.2022.2092609
D. DeGraff, D. Levison, E. Dungumaro
{"title":"孩子们在环境杂务方面的工作:谁说","authors":"D. DeGraff, D. Levison, E. Dungumaro","doi":"10.1080/13600818.2022.2092609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The standard approach for collecting sociodemographic data about children in developing countries is to elicit information from adults. While using proxy respondents is appropriate for very young children or for questions likely beyond children’s knowledge, it is less clear that it is better for older children and topics within their experience. Several arguments can be made that children could provide better or equally valid information on their activities than proxy respondents. We explore this question in the context of children’s work on environmental chores in rural Tanzania, using data that include parallel questions to children ages 10–17 and to proxy respondents about those children. Given the paucity of research on this issue, we offer exploratory evidence suggesting that efforts to collect data directly from children are fruitful and should be vigorously pursued, in keeping with Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child","PeriodicalId":51612,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Development Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"50 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children’s work in environmental chores: ‘says who?’\",\"authors\":\"D. DeGraff, D. Levison, E. Dungumaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13600818.2022.2092609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The standard approach for collecting sociodemographic data about children in developing countries is to elicit information from adults. While using proxy respondents is appropriate for very young children or for questions likely beyond children’s knowledge, it is less clear that it is better for older children and topics within their experience. Several arguments can be made that children could provide better or equally valid information on their activities than proxy respondents. We explore this question in the context of children’s work on environmental chores in rural Tanzania, using data that include parallel questions to children ages 10–17 and to proxy respondents about those children. Given the paucity of research on this issue, we offer exploratory evidence suggesting that efforts to collect data directly from children are fruitful and should be vigorously pursued, in keeping with Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child\",\"PeriodicalId\":51612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"50 - 65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2022.2092609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2022.2092609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要收集发展中国家儿童社会人口统计数据的标准方法是从成年人那里获取信息。虽然使用代理受访者适合年幼的儿童或可能超出儿童知识范围的问题,但不太清楚这是否对年龄较大的儿童和他们经验范围内的话题更好。有几种观点认为,与代理受访者相比,儿童可以提供更好或同样有效的活动信息。我们在坦桑尼亚农村儿童从事环境家务的背景下探讨了这个问题,使用的数据包括对10-17岁儿童的平行问题,以及对这些儿童的代理受访者。鉴于对这一问题的研究很少,我们提供的探索性证据表明,直接从儿童那里收集数据的努力是富有成效的,应该根据《联合国儿童权利公约》第12条大力开展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Children’s work in environmental chores: ‘says who?’
ABSTRACT The standard approach for collecting sociodemographic data about children in developing countries is to elicit information from adults. While using proxy respondents is appropriate for very young children or for questions likely beyond children’s knowledge, it is less clear that it is better for older children and topics within their experience. Several arguments can be made that children could provide better or equally valid information on their activities than proxy respondents. We explore this question in the context of children’s work on environmental chores in rural Tanzania, using data that include parallel questions to children ages 10–17 and to proxy respondents about those children. Given the paucity of research on this issue, we offer exploratory evidence suggesting that efforts to collect data directly from children are fruitful and should be vigorously pursued, in keeping with Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oxford Development Studies
Oxford Development Studies DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Oxford Development Studies is a multidisciplinary academic journal aimed at the student, research and policy-making community, which provides a forum for rigorous and critical analysis of conventional theories and policy issues in all aspects of development, and aims to contribute to new approaches. It covers a number of disciplines related to development, including economics, history, politics, anthropology and sociology, and will publish quantitative papers as well as surveys of literature.
期刊最新文献
Social equity and care for the earth: tensions and synergies in Latin America Non-contributory social protection for adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: a review of government programmes and impacts Social conflicts over the use of water resources in Chile: the role of social movements and business power ODS lecture, development studies association 2023 stories from the Global South: the interplay of climate science, ‘action’ and the implications for development Inequality in environmental risk exposure and procedural justice in the Matanza-Riachuelo River Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1