在建筑话语中做文章

H. Frichot
{"title":"在建筑话语中做文章","authors":"H. Frichot","doi":"10.1080/10331867.2022.2069360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay presents a series of discursive and performative events extending from 1988 to 2016, where the contributions of feminist theories and practices in the architectural humanities are celebrated. An editorial written for the Melbourne-based Transition journal in 1988 by Harriet Edquist and Karen Burns offers a point of departure by directly placing two terms into critical negotiation: women and architecture. Motivated by this negotiation of terms, I ask the deceptively simple question: What do women do to architectural discourse? To address this question, I offer an account of five specific and situated episodes, including roundtables, conferences, and edited publications, where a performative gesture and speculations on feminist futures begin to emerge. I further introduce the conceptual and collective figure of “women who make a fuss”, drawing on the book of the same name by feminist philosopher of science Isabelle Stengers and animal studies scholar Vinciane Despret. “Women”, as Stengers and Despret argue, is a “marked category”, and it will be strategically used in this essay not as an essential and fixed category, but as an analytical concept as well as a situated position that is performed and revised with each new encounter.","PeriodicalId":42105,"journal":{"name":"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand","volume":"32 1","pages":"136 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making a Fuss in Architectural Discourse\",\"authors\":\"H. Frichot\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10331867.2022.2069360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This essay presents a series of discursive and performative events extending from 1988 to 2016, where the contributions of feminist theories and practices in the architectural humanities are celebrated. An editorial written for the Melbourne-based Transition journal in 1988 by Harriet Edquist and Karen Burns offers a point of departure by directly placing two terms into critical negotiation: women and architecture. Motivated by this negotiation of terms, I ask the deceptively simple question: What do women do to architectural discourse? To address this question, I offer an account of five specific and situated episodes, including roundtables, conferences, and edited publications, where a performative gesture and speculations on feminist futures begin to emerge. I further introduce the conceptual and collective figure of “women who make a fuss”, drawing on the book of the same name by feminist philosopher of science Isabelle Stengers and animal studies scholar Vinciane Despret. “Women”, as Stengers and Despret argue, is a “marked category”, and it will be strategically used in this essay not as an essential and fixed category, but as an analytical concept as well as a situated position that is performed and revised with each new encounter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"136 - 154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2022.2069360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fabrications-The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2022.2069360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了从1988年到2016年的一系列话语和表演事件,在这些事件中,女性主义理论和实践在建筑人文学科中的贡献得到了庆祝。1988年,Harriet Edquist和Karen Burns为墨尔本的《过渡》杂志撰写的一篇社论提供了一个出发点,他们直接将两个术语置于关键的谈判中:女性和建筑。在这种条件谈判的激励下,我问了一个看似简单的问题:女性对建筑话语做了什么?为了解决这个问题,我提供了五个具体的和情境的事件,包括圆桌会议,会议和编辑出版物,在这些事件中,一种表演姿态和对女权主义未来的猜测开始出现。我进一步介绍了“小题大做的女人”的概念和集体形象,借鉴了女权主义科学哲学家伊莎贝尔·斯坦格斯和动物研究学者文森德斯普雷特的同名著作。正如Stengers和Despret所说,“女性”是一个“被标记的类别”,在本文中,它将被策略性地使用,而不是作为一个基本的和固定的类别,而是作为一个分析概念以及一个定位,随着每次新的相遇而执行和修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making a Fuss in Architectural Discourse
ABSTRACT This essay presents a series of discursive and performative events extending from 1988 to 2016, where the contributions of feminist theories and practices in the architectural humanities are celebrated. An editorial written for the Melbourne-based Transition journal in 1988 by Harriet Edquist and Karen Burns offers a point of departure by directly placing two terms into critical negotiation: women and architecture. Motivated by this negotiation of terms, I ask the deceptively simple question: What do women do to architectural discourse? To address this question, I offer an account of five specific and situated episodes, including roundtables, conferences, and edited publications, where a performative gesture and speculations on feminist futures begin to emerge. I further introduce the conceptual and collective figure of “women who make a fuss”, drawing on the book of the same name by feminist philosopher of science Isabelle Stengers and animal studies scholar Vinciane Despret. “Women”, as Stengers and Despret argue, is a “marked category”, and it will be strategically used in this essay not as an essential and fixed category, but as an analytical concept as well as a situated position that is performed and revised with each new encounter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
From Hilltop Landmarks to Suburban Place Makers: Brisbane’s Post-War Religious Territories and Communities The Politics of the Visual: Immigrant Architecture in Melbourne’s Tourist Brochures Magnifying the Terrace: David Saunders and the Cross Street Co-Operative Housing Development Form, Function and Monumentality: A Critical Analysis of Jørn Utzon’s Late Work on the Sydney Opera House An Antipodean Attica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1