Taylor Goelz, A. Scheld, Troy W. Hartley, I. Carboni
{"title":"理解在参与式建模过程中影响凝聚力发展的结构因素和行动者属性","authors":"Taylor Goelz, A. Scheld, Troy W. Hartley, I. Carboni","doi":"10.1080/08920753.2020.1823669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many “wicked” natural resources management problems today are utilizing more collaborative methods of decision making. Through involving stakeholders in decision-making, resource managers can induce engagement and support for final decisions and prevent future conflict. Additionally, participation is thought to yield increased group cohesion, where stakeholders better understand each other’s perspectives. Cohesion is essential for collaborative processes to develop a collective vision for management of the resource. While development of cohesion within collaborative decision-making processes has been discussed, changes in cohesion have not been quantitatively demonstrated or described during these processes. Using longitudinal social network analysis models, we illustrate changes in cohesion during OysterFutures, a participatory modeling process in the Chesapeake Bay. Results showed cohesion development was not homogeneous; structural network factors and stakeholder group co-membership impacted the overall group cohesion. This article concludes with a discussion on the value of temporal social network analysis and areas for future research.","PeriodicalId":50995,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Management","volume":"48 1","pages":"577 - 600"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08920753.2020.1823669","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Structural Factors and Actor Attributes That Impact the Development of Cohesion within a Participatory Modeling Process\",\"authors\":\"Taylor Goelz, A. Scheld, Troy W. Hartley, I. Carboni\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08920753.2020.1823669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Many “wicked” natural resources management problems today are utilizing more collaborative methods of decision making. Through involving stakeholders in decision-making, resource managers can induce engagement and support for final decisions and prevent future conflict. Additionally, participation is thought to yield increased group cohesion, where stakeholders better understand each other’s perspectives. Cohesion is essential for collaborative processes to develop a collective vision for management of the resource. While development of cohesion within collaborative decision-making processes has been discussed, changes in cohesion have not been quantitatively demonstrated or described during these processes. Using longitudinal social network analysis models, we illustrate changes in cohesion during OysterFutures, a participatory modeling process in the Chesapeake Bay. Results showed cohesion development was not homogeneous; structural network factors and stakeholder group co-membership impacted the overall group cohesion. This article concludes with a discussion on the value of temporal social network analysis and areas for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"577 - 600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08920753.2020.1823669\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2020.1823669\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2020.1823669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding Structural Factors and Actor Attributes That Impact the Development of Cohesion within a Participatory Modeling Process
Abstract Many “wicked” natural resources management problems today are utilizing more collaborative methods of decision making. Through involving stakeholders in decision-making, resource managers can induce engagement and support for final decisions and prevent future conflict. Additionally, participation is thought to yield increased group cohesion, where stakeholders better understand each other’s perspectives. Cohesion is essential for collaborative processes to develop a collective vision for management of the resource. While development of cohesion within collaborative decision-making processes has been discussed, changes in cohesion have not been quantitatively demonstrated or described during these processes. Using longitudinal social network analysis models, we illustrate changes in cohesion during OysterFutures, a participatory modeling process in the Chesapeake Bay. Results showed cohesion development was not homogeneous; structural network factors and stakeholder group co-membership impacted the overall group cohesion. This article concludes with a discussion on the value of temporal social network analysis and areas for future research.
期刊介绍:
Coastal Management is an international peer-reviewed, applied research journal dedicated to exploring the technical, applied ecological, legal, political, social, and policy issues relating to the use of coastal and ocean resources and environments on a global scale. The journal presents timely information on management tools and techniques as well as recent findings from research and analysis that bear directly on management and policy. Findings must be grounded in the current peer reviewed literature and relevant studies. Articles must contain a clear and relevant management component. Preference is given to studies of interest to an international readership, but case studies are accepted if conclusions are derived from acceptable evaluative methods, reference to comparable cases, and related to peer reviewed studies.