{"title":"魔法的使用:马来亚殖民地的当地知识和“不科学的原住民”","authors":"F. Noor","doi":"10.1353/ras.2021.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Colonial violence cannot simply be studied by looking at the instances of wars and battles fought in the age of Empire. Equally important is the working of epistemic violence and the violence that accompanies the process of learning about, framing and categorizing the colonized Other. This paper looks at one aspect of colonial Othering in particular, which is the manner in which colonial functionaries and scholars turned their attention to the local knowledge/s of those who came under colonial rule, and how in the course of collecting, codifying and categorizing these knowledges native texts, histories and narratives were systematically devalued—as 'mythologies', 'legends', or fairy-tales—and in due course relegated to a secondary register as 'non-knowledge' that could not be instrumentalised to serve the needs of racialized colonial-capitalism. Focusing in particular on the works of Walter William Skeat with those of his co-authors Charles Otto Blagden and A. Hillman—officials who were embedded in the machinery of British rule in Malaya—this paper will look at how their study of Malay customs and beliefs was based on Western/Eurocentric understandings of (rational, instrumental) knowledge that in turn downgraded other non-Western epistemologies and belief-systems; and by doing so contributed to the notion of the lazy/backward/unscientific native Other.","PeriodicalId":39524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society","volume":"94 1","pages":"119 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Uses of Magic: Local Knowledge and the 'Unscientific Native' in Colonial Malaya\",\"authors\":\"F. Noor\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ras.2021.0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Colonial violence cannot simply be studied by looking at the instances of wars and battles fought in the age of Empire. Equally important is the working of epistemic violence and the violence that accompanies the process of learning about, framing and categorizing the colonized Other. This paper looks at one aspect of colonial Othering in particular, which is the manner in which colonial functionaries and scholars turned their attention to the local knowledge/s of those who came under colonial rule, and how in the course of collecting, codifying and categorizing these knowledges native texts, histories and narratives were systematically devalued—as 'mythologies', 'legends', or fairy-tales—and in due course relegated to a secondary register as 'non-knowledge' that could not be instrumentalised to serve the needs of racialized colonial-capitalism. Focusing in particular on the works of Walter William Skeat with those of his co-authors Charles Otto Blagden and A. Hillman—officials who were embedded in the machinery of British rule in Malaya—this paper will look at how their study of Malay customs and beliefs was based on Western/Eurocentric understandings of (rational, instrumental) knowledge that in turn downgraded other non-Western epistemologies and belief-systems; and by doing so contributed to the notion of the lazy/backward/unscientific native Other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"119 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ras.2021.0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ras.2021.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:殖民暴力不能简单地通过观察帝国时代的战争和战斗实例来研究。同样重要的是认知暴力的作用,以及在学习、构建和分类被殖民的他者的过程中产生的暴力。本文特别关注了殖民他人的一个方面,即殖民官员和学者将注意力转向殖民统治下的当地知识的方式,以及在收集、编纂和分类这些知识的过程中,土著文本、历史和叙事如何被系统地贬低为“神话”、“传说”、“神话”和“传说”。或者童话故事——在适当的时候被贬为“非知识”,不能被用来满足种族化的殖民资本主义的需要。本文将特别关注Walter William Skeat及其合著者Charles Otto Blagden和A. hillman的作品,这些官员被嵌入英国在马来亚的统治机制中,本文将研究他们对马来习俗和信仰的研究是如何基于西方/欧洲中心对(理性的、工具的)知识的理解,而这种理解反过来又贬低了其他非西方认识论和信仰体系;并因此助长了懒惰/落后/不科学的本土他者的观念。
The Uses of Magic: Local Knowledge and the 'Unscientific Native' in Colonial Malaya
Abstract:Colonial violence cannot simply be studied by looking at the instances of wars and battles fought in the age of Empire. Equally important is the working of epistemic violence and the violence that accompanies the process of learning about, framing and categorizing the colonized Other. This paper looks at one aspect of colonial Othering in particular, which is the manner in which colonial functionaries and scholars turned their attention to the local knowledge/s of those who came under colonial rule, and how in the course of collecting, codifying and categorizing these knowledges native texts, histories and narratives were systematically devalued—as 'mythologies', 'legends', or fairy-tales—and in due course relegated to a secondary register as 'non-knowledge' that could not be instrumentalised to serve the needs of racialized colonial-capitalism. Focusing in particular on the works of Walter William Skeat with those of his co-authors Charles Otto Blagden and A. Hillman—officials who were embedded in the machinery of British rule in Malaya—this paper will look at how their study of Malay customs and beliefs was based on Western/Eurocentric understandings of (rational, instrumental) knowledge that in turn downgraded other non-Western epistemologies and belief-systems; and by doing so contributed to the notion of the lazy/backward/unscientific native Other.