案例表述的信心和多元主义是心理学家对不确定性容忍度的预测因素

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Counselling Psychology Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-11-17 DOI:10.1080/09515070.2021.1997918
Elly Quinlan, F. Deane, S. Schilder, Ellen Read
{"title":"案例表述的信心和多元主义是心理学家对不确定性容忍度的预测因素","authors":"Elly Quinlan, F. Deane, S. Schilder, Ellen Read","doi":"10.1080/09515070.2021.1997918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The role of a practicing psychologist often involves uncertainty and ambiguity, and individuals differ in their ability to manage or “tolerate” this uncertainty. This study investigated the relationship between tolerance of uncertainty, pluralism and confidence in case formulation in a sample of Australian psychologists. The sample consisted of 190 Australian psychologists, aged between 22 and 69 years (M = 30.48, SD = 8.04) and comprising mostly females (77.9%). This study had a cross-sectional survey design in which participants completed measures of uncertainty tolerance, pluralism and confidence in case formulation. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to predict tolerance to uncertainty. The final regression model was significant and explained 39.1% of the variance in tolerance of uncertainty. The predictor variables that contributed significantly to the model were therapeutic orientation, age, pluralistic practice and confidence in case formulation. Stage of career and pluralistic philosophy did not contribute significantly to the model. Higher pluralistic practice and confidence in case formulation skills are related to higher tolerance of uncertainty. Training in pluralistic models of therapy and the hypothesis generation approach to case formulation may offer the potential to increase uncertainty tolerance in practicing psychologists.","PeriodicalId":51653,"journal":{"name":"Counselling Psychology Quarterly","volume":"35 1","pages":"943 - 958"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confidence in case formulation and pluralism as predictors of psychologists’ tolerance of uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Elly Quinlan, F. Deane, S. Schilder, Ellen Read\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09515070.2021.1997918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The role of a practicing psychologist often involves uncertainty and ambiguity, and individuals differ in their ability to manage or “tolerate” this uncertainty. This study investigated the relationship between tolerance of uncertainty, pluralism and confidence in case formulation in a sample of Australian psychologists. The sample consisted of 190 Australian psychologists, aged between 22 and 69 years (M = 30.48, SD = 8.04) and comprising mostly females (77.9%). This study had a cross-sectional survey design in which participants completed measures of uncertainty tolerance, pluralism and confidence in case formulation. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to predict tolerance to uncertainty. The final regression model was significant and explained 39.1% of the variance in tolerance of uncertainty. The predictor variables that contributed significantly to the model were therapeutic orientation, age, pluralistic practice and confidence in case formulation. Stage of career and pluralistic philosophy did not contribute significantly to the model. Higher pluralistic practice and confidence in case formulation skills are related to higher tolerance of uncertainty. Training in pluralistic models of therapy and the hypothesis generation approach to case formulation may offer the potential to increase uncertainty tolerance in practicing psychologists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counselling Psychology Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"943 - 958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counselling Psychology Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2021.1997918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling Psychology Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2021.1997918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

执业心理学家的角色经常涉及不确定性和模糊性,个体管理或“容忍”这种不确定性的能力不同。本研究调查了澳大利亚心理学家样本中对不确定性、多元性和信心的容忍之间的关系。样本由190名澳大利亚心理学家组成,年龄在22至69岁之间(M = 30.48, SD = 8.04),其中大部分是女性(77.9%)。本研究采用横断面调查设计,其中参与者完成了不确定性容忍度、多元性和案例制定信心的测量。采用层次多元回归预测对不确定性的容忍度。最终的回归模型是显著的,解释了39.1%的不确定性容忍度方差。对模型有显著贡献的预测变量是治疗取向、年龄、多元化实践和对病例制定的信心。职业生涯阶段和多元哲学对模型的影响不显著。更高的多元化实践和对案例制定技能的信心与更高的不确定性容忍度有关。多元治疗模式的培训和案例制定的假设生成方法可能会增加执业心理学家对不确定性的容忍度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Confidence in case formulation and pluralism as predictors of psychologists’ tolerance of uncertainty
ABSTRACT The role of a practicing psychologist often involves uncertainty and ambiguity, and individuals differ in their ability to manage or “tolerate” this uncertainty. This study investigated the relationship between tolerance of uncertainty, pluralism and confidence in case formulation in a sample of Australian psychologists. The sample consisted of 190 Australian psychologists, aged between 22 and 69 years (M = 30.48, SD = 8.04) and comprising mostly females (77.9%). This study had a cross-sectional survey design in which participants completed measures of uncertainty tolerance, pluralism and confidence in case formulation. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to predict tolerance to uncertainty. The final regression model was significant and explained 39.1% of the variance in tolerance of uncertainty. The predictor variables that contributed significantly to the model were therapeutic orientation, age, pluralistic practice and confidence in case formulation. Stage of career and pluralistic philosophy did not contribute significantly to the model. Higher pluralistic practice and confidence in case formulation skills are related to higher tolerance of uncertainty. Training in pluralistic models of therapy and the hypothesis generation approach to case formulation may offer the potential to increase uncertainty tolerance in practicing psychologists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling Psychology Quarterly
Counselling Psychology Quarterly PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Counselling Psychology Quarterly is an international interdisciplinary journal, reporting on practice, research and theory. The journal is particularly keen to encourage and publish papers which will be of immediate practical relevance to counselling, clinical, occupational, health and medical psychologists throughout the world. Original, independently refereed contributions will be included on practice, research and theory - and especially articles which integrate these three areas - from whatever methodological or theoretical standpoint. The journal will also include international peer review commentaries on major issues.
期刊最新文献
Meaning-making in psychotherapy after traumatic loss: therapists’ perspectives Finding a voice: A qualitative investigation of the therapeutic relationship with patients suffering from avoidant personality disorder Factors moderating the relationship between peer contact and self-stigma in people with mental illness The development of the Moments of Flourishing Experience Scale: a new scale to measure positive, affect-based flourishing state experiences Vicarious resilience in ethnic identity among BIPOC counsellors and psychotherapists working with attempted genocide survivors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1