你谈论快乐的暴君。柏拉图和色诺芬谈哲学、暴政和良好治理

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Plato Journal Pub Date : 2020-08-04 DOI:10.14195/2183-4105_20_3
Claudia Mársico
{"title":"你谈论快乐的暴君。柏拉图和色诺芬谈哲学、暴政和良好治理","authors":"Claudia Mársico","doi":"10.14195/2183-4105_20_3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plato and Xenophon had different perspectives on the better governance. In this paper, I study the notion of tyranny in Plato's Republic and Xenophon's Hiero to trace their views on the aptitude of philosophy to redeem the tyrant and indicate some intertextual points. On this basis, I analyse the meaning and extent of Simonides’ proposal in the Hiero rejecting the idea of a mere pragmatic approach. Finally, I examine the platonic Hipparchusto find a key to figure out the election of Simonides as Xenophon’s spokesperson. Paying attention to the context of the discussions among the Socratics, this approach enhances our understanding of these authors, regarding tyranny, the possibility of its abandonment, and the role of the intellectuals in this process.","PeriodicalId":53756,"journal":{"name":"Plato Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Habladurías sobre tiranos felices. Platón y Jenofonte a propósito de filosofía, tiranía y buen gobierno\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Mársico\",\"doi\":\"10.14195/2183-4105_20_3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Plato and Xenophon had different perspectives on the better governance. In this paper, I study the notion of tyranny in Plato's Republic and Xenophon's Hiero to trace their views on the aptitude of philosophy to redeem the tyrant and indicate some intertextual points. On this basis, I analyse the meaning and extent of Simonides’ proposal in the Hiero rejecting the idea of a mere pragmatic approach. Finally, I examine the platonic Hipparchusto find a key to figure out the election of Simonides as Xenophon’s spokesperson. Paying attention to the context of the discussions among the Socratics, this approach enhances our understanding of these authors, regarding tyranny, the possibility of its abandonment, and the role of the intellectuals in this process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plato Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plato Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_20_3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plato Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_20_3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

柏拉图和色诺芬对更好的治理有着不同的看法。本文以柏拉图的《理想国》和色诺芬的《耶罗》中的暴政概念为研究对象,追溯他们对哲学救赎暴君的能力的看法,并指出一些互文点。在此基础上,我分析了西蒙尼德斯在《耶罗》中提出的拒绝纯粹实用主义方法的建议的意义和程度。最后,我检视柏拉图式的希帕恰库斯,以找出西蒙尼德被选为色诺芬代言人的关键。注意苏格拉底之间讨论的背景,这种方法增强了我们对这些作者的理解,关于暴政,放弃暴政的可能性,以及知识分子在这一过程中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Habladurías sobre tiranos felices. Platón y Jenofonte a propósito de filosofía, tiranía y buen gobierno
Plato and Xenophon had different perspectives on the better governance. In this paper, I study the notion of tyranny in Plato's Republic and Xenophon's Hiero to trace their views on the aptitude of philosophy to redeem the tyrant and indicate some intertextual points. On this basis, I analyse the meaning and extent of Simonides’ proposal in the Hiero rejecting the idea of a mere pragmatic approach. Finally, I examine the platonic Hipparchusto find a key to figure out the election of Simonides as Xenophon’s spokesperson. Paying attention to the context of the discussions among the Socratics, this approach enhances our understanding of these authors, regarding tyranny, the possibility of its abandonment, and the role of the intellectuals in this process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plato Journal
Plato Journal PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
J. K. Larsen, V. V. Haraldsen, and J. Vlasits (eds.), New Perspectives on Platonic Dialectic. A Philosophy of Inquiry, New York - London, Routledge 2022 Choosing and Desire in Plato's Republic 4 Myth, virtue and method in Plato’s Meno Mason Marshall, Reading Plato’s Dialogues to Enhance Learning and Inquiry: Exploring Socrates’ Use of Protreptic for Student Engagement. New York: Routledge F. Benoni; A. Stavru (eds.) (2021). Platone e il governo delle passioni. Studi per Linda Napolitano. Perugia, Aguaplano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1