中间语音系统的兴起

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Diachronica Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI:10.1075/dia.20058.ing
G. Inglese
{"title":"中间语音系统的兴起","authors":"G. Inglese","doi":"10.1075/dia.20058.ing","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Middle markers are characterized by a distribution halfway between grammar and the lexicon: with some verbs,\n middle marking encodes valency change, while with others it obligatorily occurs with no obvious synchronic motivation. Despite the\n existing cross-linguistic work on middle markers, their history is still largely unknown. In the typological literature, the\n standard view is that middle markers predominantly have their origin in reflexive markers, and that, in their development, it is\n invariantly the grammatical component that expands to the lexical component. In this paper, I challenge these assumptions based on\n the analysis of a sample of 129 middle marking languages. As I show, the sources and pathways whereby middle markers come about\n are much more numerous and varied than what has been reported in the literature. By taking a source-oriented approach, I also\n discuss how recurrent cross-linguistic trends in the distribution of middle markers can in part be explained by looking at their\n history.","PeriodicalId":44637,"journal":{"name":"Diachronica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The rise of middle voice systems\",\"authors\":\"G. Inglese\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/dia.20058.ing\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Middle markers are characterized by a distribution halfway between grammar and the lexicon: with some verbs,\\n middle marking encodes valency change, while with others it obligatorily occurs with no obvious synchronic motivation. Despite the\\n existing cross-linguistic work on middle markers, their history is still largely unknown. In the typological literature, the\\n standard view is that middle markers predominantly have their origin in reflexive markers, and that, in their development, it is\\n invariantly the grammatical component that expands to the lexical component. In this paper, I challenge these assumptions based on\\n the analysis of a sample of 129 middle marking languages. As I show, the sources and pathways whereby middle markers come about\\n are much more numerous and varied than what has been reported in the literature. By taking a source-oriented approach, I also\\n discuss how recurrent cross-linguistic trends in the distribution of middle markers can in part be explained by looking at their\\n history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diachronica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diachronica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20058.ing\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diachronica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20058.ing","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

中间标记的特点是在语法和词汇之间的中间分布,有些动词中间标记编码配价变化,有些动词中间标记是强制性的,没有明显的共时动机。尽管已有关于中间标记的跨语言研究,但它们的历史在很大程度上仍然未知。在类型学文献中,标准的观点是,中间标记主要起源于反身标记,并且在其发展过程中,始终是语法成分扩展到词汇成分。在本文中,我基于对129种中间标记语言样本的分析来挑战这些假设。正如我所展示的,中间标记产生的来源和途径比文献中报道的要多得多,也更多样化。通过采用面向源的方法,我还讨论了如何通过查看中间标记的历史来部分解释中间标记分布中反复出现的跨语言趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The rise of middle voice systems
Middle markers are characterized by a distribution halfway between grammar and the lexicon: with some verbs, middle marking encodes valency change, while with others it obligatorily occurs with no obvious synchronic motivation. Despite the existing cross-linguistic work on middle markers, their history is still largely unknown. In the typological literature, the standard view is that middle markers predominantly have their origin in reflexive markers, and that, in their development, it is invariantly the grammatical component that expands to the lexical component. In this paper, I challenge these assumptions based on the analysis of a sample of 129 middle marking languages. As I show, the sources and pathways whereby middle markers come about are much more numerous and varied than what has been reported in the literature. By taking a source-oriented approach, I also discuss how recurrent cross-linguistic trends in the distribution of middle markers can in part be explained by looking at their history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diachronica
Diachronica Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Diachronica provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of information concerning all aspects of language change in any and all languages of the globe. Contributions which combine theoretical interest and philological acumen are especially welcome. Diachronica appears three times per year, publishing articles, review articles, book reviews, and a miscellanea section including notes, reports and discussions.
期刊最新文献
Gender reduction in contact Diachrony and Diachronica Abrupt grammatical reorganization of an emergent sign language Linguistic mechanisms of colour term evolution Realis morphology and Chatino’s role in the diversification of Zapotec languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1