女权主义和酷儿理论有什么用?:论混乱的方法、档案和对象

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES Feminist Studies Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1353/fem.2022.0048
H. Gupta, Carly Thomsen, Jennifer D. Ortegren, Karin Hanta, Jessyka Finley, Kristin Bright, Laurie Essig, Catharine Wright, Patricia Saldarriaga, Fernando Rocha
{"title":"女权主义和酷儿理论有什么用?:论混乱的方法、档案和对象","authors":"H. Gupta, Carly Thomsen, Jennifer D. Ortegren, Karin Hanta, Jessyka Finley, Kristin Bright, Laurie Essig, Catharine Wright, Patricia Saldarriaga, Fernando Rocha","doi":"10.1353/fem.2022.0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:By thinking with Feminist and Queer Studies, what new languages, objects of study, archives, and methods are enabled for those with other disciplinary trainings? This article uses as a case study a recent workshop that we—two Ph.D.s in Feminist Studies—convened for our colleagues who are affiliated with Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies and had expressed their desire to be in conversation with current Feminist and Queer Studies debates. We selected seminar texts based on topics explored in recent special issues of Feminist and Queer Studies journals, including: feminist method, feminist technoscience and new materialisms, affect, and feminist and queer geographies. Following a week-long feminist and queer theory workshop, participants reflect on how our discussions regarding method, archives, and objects of study inform their own intellectual and political concerns and commitments. Ultimately, this article offers insights into the new engagements and vocabularies engendered by feminist and queer theory as it travels across and against varied disciplinary persuasions.","PeriodicalId":35884,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"713 - 743"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What's the Use of Feminist and Queer Theory?: On Messy Methods, Archives, and Objects\",\"authors\":\"H. Gupta, Carly Thomsen, Jennifer D. Ortegren, Karin Hanta, Jessyka Finley, Kristin Bright, Laurie Essig, Catharine Wright, Patricia Saldarriaga, Fernando Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/fem.2022.0048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:By thinking with Feminist and Queer Studies, what new languages, objects of study, archives, and methods are enabled for those with other disciplinary trainings? This article uses as a case study a recent workshop that we—two Ph.D.s in Feminist Studies—convened for our colleagues who are affiliated with Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies and had expressed their desire to be in conversation with current Feminist and Queer Studies debates. We selected seminar texts based on topics explored in recent special issues of Feminist and Queer Studies journals, including: feminist method, feminist technoscience and new materialisms, affect, and feminist and queer geographies. Following a week-long feminist and queer theory workshop, participants reflect on how our discussions regarding method, archives, and objects of study inform their own intellectual and political concerns and commitments. Ultimately, this article offers insights into the new engagements and vocabularies engendered by feminist and queer theory as it travels across and against varied disciplinary persuasions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"713 - 743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2022.0048\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2022.0048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:通过对女权主义和酷儿研究的思考,哪些新的语言、研究对象、档案和方法可以为那些受过其他学科训练的人所用?这篇文章使用了最近的一个研讨会作为案例研究,我们——两位女权主义研究博士——为我们的同事召集了一个研讨会,他们隶属于性别、性和女权主义研究,并表达了他们希望与当前的女权主义和酷儿研究辩论对话的愿望。我们根据女权主义和酷儿研究杂志最近特刊上探讨的主题选择了研讨会文本,包括:女权主义方法、女权主义技术科学和新材料主义、情感以及女权主义和同性恋地理。在为期一周的女权主义和酷儿理论研讨会之后,参与者反思了我们关于方法、档案和研究对象的讨论如何为他们自己的智力和政治关注和承诺提供信息。最终,这篇文章提供了对女权主义和酷儿理论产生的新的参与和词汇的见解,因为它跨越和反对各种学科观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What's the Use of Feminist and Queer Theory?: On Messy Methods, Archives, and Objects
Abstract:By thinking with Feminist and Queer Studies, what new languages, objects of study, archives, and methods are enabled for those with other disciplinary trainings? This article uses as a case study a recent workshop that we—two Ph.D.s in Feminist Studies—convened for our colleagues who are affiliated with Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies and had expressed their desire to be in conversation with current Feminist and Queer Studies debates. We selected seminar texts based on topics explored in recent special issues of Feminist and Queer Studies journals, including: feminist method, feminist technoscience and new materialisms, affect, and feminist and queer geographies. Following a week-long feminist and queer theory workshop, participants reflect on how our discussions regarding method, archives, and objects of study inform their own intellectual and political concerns and commitments. Ultimately, this article offers insights into the new engagements and vocabularies engendered by feminist and queer theory as it travels across and against varied disciplinary persuasions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Studies
Feminist Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Pleasures of the Hunt / We Must Be Creatures: Toward an Ecofeminist Hunting Ethic What Hungers Call Us Home? Engaging Autotheory Through Food Legal Landscapes Post-Roe: Shifts in Antiabortion Violence and Implications of the face Act Oasis by Necessity: The Post-Dobbs Landscape in Central Illinois "Brutality and its aftermath": Autotheoretical Engagements with Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1