“我们怎么能不去摩苏尔?”《摩苏尔的俄瑞斯忒斯》中的同理心、Anagnorisis和认知政治

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 N/A THEATER CANADIAN THEATRE REVIEW Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.3138/ctr.192.012
Theodoros Ioannou
{"title":"“我们怎么能不去摩苏尔?”《摩苏尔的俄瑞斯忒斯》中的同理心、Anagnorisis和认知政治","authors":"Theodoros Ioannou","doi":"10.3138/ctr.192.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article discusses Milo Rau's and the Ghent Ensemble's recent performance Orestes in Mosul (2019–2020) and the significance of representing ongoing conflict onstage. This article examines the ways in which the politics of recognition, a term coined by Charles Taylor and explored by many scholars after him, has given a renewed relevance to anagnorisis, a term coined by Aristotle and understood as a technical function of classical tragedy. Anagnorisis can be used as a means of accessing empathetic capacities that can in turn create an ethical framework for the reassessment of marginalized identities. In this way, anagnorisis ceases to be the realization of an erroneous action and becomes the protestation of an injustice and the structures of oppression that maintain and perpetuate it. Finally, this article addresses the controversy surrounding Milo Rau and Orestes in Mosul and concludes that at a time of major humanitarian crises, socially and politically engaged theatre can mean the difference between passively observing the practice of exploitation and actively practising solidarity.","PeriodicalId":42646,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN THEATRE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"How Could We Not Go to Mosul?\\\": Empathy, Anagnorisis, and the Politics of Recognition in Orestes in Mosul\",\"authors\":\"Theodoros Ioannou\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ctr.192.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article discusses Milo Rau's and the Ghent Ensemble's recent performance Orestes in Mosul (2019–2020) and the significance of representing ongoing conflict onstage. This article examines the ways in which the politics of recognition, a term coined by Charles Taylor and explored by many scholars after him, has given a renewed relevance to anagnorisis, a term coined by Aristotle and understood as a technical function of classical tragedy. Anagnorisis can be used as a means of accessing empathetic capacities that can in turn create an ethical framework for the reassessment of marginalized identities. In this way, anagnorisis ceases to be the realization of an erroneous action and becomes the protestation of an injustice and the structures of oppression that maintain and perpetuate it. Finally, this article addresses the controversy surrounding Milo Rau and Orestes in Mosul and concludes that at a time of major humanitarian crises, socially and politically engaged theatre can mean the difference between passively observing the practice of exploitation and actively practising solidarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANADIAN THEATRE REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANADIAN THEATRE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ctr.192.012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN THEATRE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ctr.192.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文讨论了米洛·劳和根特合奏团最近在摩苏尔的演出《俄瑞斯忒斯》(2019-2020),以及在舞台上表现持续冲突的意义。本文考察了由查尔斯·泰勒(Charles Taylor)创造并在他之后被许多学者探索的“承认政治”(politics of recognition)与亚里士多德(Aristotle)创造并被理解为古典悲剧的技术功能的“anagnorisis”重新相关的方式。anagnoris可以作为一种获得同理心能力的手段,反过来又可以为重新评估边缘化身份创造一个伦理框架。通过这种方式,anagnosis不再是错误行为的实现,而成为对不公正的抗议,以及维持和延续它的压迫结构。最后,本文探讨围绕摩苏尔的Milo Rau和Orestes的争议,并得出结论,在重大人道主义危机时期,社会和政治参与的戏剧可能意味着被动观察剥削实践与积极实践团结之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"How Could We Not Go to Mosul?": Empathy, Anagnorisis, and the Politics of Recognition in Orestes in Mosul
Abstract:This article discusses Milo Rau's and the Ghent Ensemble's recent performance Orestes in Mosul (2019–2020) and the significance of representing ongoing conflict onstage. This article examines the ways in which the politics of recognition, a term coined by Charles Taylor and explored by many scholars after him, has given a renewed relevance to anagnorisis, a term coined by Aristotle and understood as a technical function of classical tragedy. Anagnorisis can be used as a means of accessing empathetic capacities that can in turn create an ethical framework for the reassessment of marginalized identities. In this way, anagnorisis ceases to be the realization of an erroneous action and becomes the protestation of an injustice and the structures of oppression that maintain and perpetuate it. Finally, this article addresses the controversy surrounding Milo Rau and Orestes in Mosul and concludes that at a time of major humanitarian crises, socially and politically engaged theatre can mean the difference between passively observing the practice of exploitation and actively practising solidarity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Some Must Watch While Some Must Sleep: An Impromptu Text Thread 1939 Reflections on Adaptation, Indigenous Theatre, and Shakespeare’s Legacy If Not Democratic Holy Moly Creation Practices in Participatory Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1