{"title":"亚里士多德的《佛洛西论》及其翻译的困境","authors":"Zohreh Tafazzoli, Raed Faridzadeh","doi":"10.21071/hikma.v21i1.13618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Greek Phronesis is among the key concepts in Aristotle’s ethics and politics. It appears especially in the Book VI of his Nicomachean Ethics. The translators of Aristotle’s work could only render those aspects of its meaning that they were able to comprehend. The present study examines how phronesis is transmitted into Arabic in the revised version of the first known translation of the Nicomachean Ethics by Isḥāq Ibn Ḥunain (9th century) where he renders it to ta‘aqqul, ‘aql or fahm, and the translation made by ‘Abd ar-Raḥmān Badawī (20th century), who translates it as fiṭna. The findings are occasionally compared with the English and German translations of the same text by two significant commentators of Aristotle. The paper concludes that while Ibn Ḥunain’s renderings are historically justified, all in all, Badawī has translated the Greek terms with relative faithfulness, although he occasionally fails to establish a correlation between the concepts.","PeriodicalId":37811,"journal":{"name":"Hikma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aristotelian ‘Phronesis’ and the dilemma of its translation\",\"authors\":\"Zohreh Tafazzoli, Raed Faridzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.21071/hikma.v21i1.13618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Greek Phronesis is among the key concepts in Aristotle’s ethics and politics. It appears especially in the Book VI of his Nicomachean Ethics. The translators of Aristotle’s work could only render those aspects of its meaning that they were able to comprehend. The present study examines how phronesis is transmitted into Arabic in the revised version of the first known translation of the Nicomachean Ethics by Isḥāq Ibn Ḥunain (9th century) where he renders it to ta‘aqqul, ‘aql or fahm, and the translation made by ‘Abd ar-Raḥmān Badawī (20th century), who translates it as fiṭna. The findings are occasionally compared with the English and German translations of the same text by two significant commentators of Aristotle. The paper concludes that while Ibn Ḥunain’s renderings are historically justified, all in all, Badawī has translated the Greek terms with relative faithfulness, although he occasionally fails to establish a correlation between the concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hikma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hikma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21071/hikma.v21i1.13618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hikma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21071/hikma.v21i1.13618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
希腊文的佛洛西是亚里士多德伦理学和政治学的关键概念之一。尤其出现在《尼各马可伦理学》第六卷。亚里士多德作品的译者只能把他们所能理解的部分翻译出来。本研究考察了phronesis是如何在Isḥāq Ibn Ḥunain(9世纪)的《尼各马可伦理学》的第一个已知译本的修订版中传播到阿拉伯语的,他将其翻译为ta ' aqqul, ' aql或fahm,以及' Abd ar-Raḥmān badawi '(20世纪)的翻译,他将其翻译为fiṭna。两位重要的亚里士多德评论家偶尔会将这些发现与同一文本的英语和德语翻译进行比较。论文的结论是,虽然伊本Ḥunain的翻译在历史上是合理的,但总而言之,巴达多伊翻译的希腊术语相对忠实,尽管他偶尔不能建立概念之间的相关性。
Aristotelian ‘Phronesis’ and the dilemma of its translation
The Greek Phronesis is among the key concepts in Aristotle’s ethics and politics. It appears especially in the Book VI of his Nicomachean Ethics. The translators of Aristotle’s work could only render those aspects of its meaning that they were able to comprehend. The present study examines how phronesis is transmitted into Arabic in the revised version of the first known translation of the Nicomachean Ethics by Isḥāq Ibn Ḥunain (9th century) where he renders it to ta‘aqqul, ‘aql or fahm, and the translation made by ‘Abd ar-Raḥmān Badawī (20th century), who translates it as fiṭna. The findings are occasionally compared with the English and German translations of the same text by two significant commentators of Aristotle. The paper concludes that while Ibn Ḥunain’s renderings are historically justified, all in all, Badawī has translated the Greek terms with relative faithfulness, although he occasionally fails to establish a correlation between the concepts.
HikmaArts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍:
HIKMA: Translation Studies Journal is an open access journal, which began in 2002, is specialized in Translation and Interpreting. HIKMA: Translation Studies Journal is listed in the SJR Indicator, Scimago Journal & Country Rank and Q1 in Literature and Literary Theory.