参与困境:国际环境协定批准实证文献综述

IF 7.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Pub Date : 2022-12-07 DOI:10.1086/722906
F. Bellelli, Ashar Aftab, R. Scarpa
{"title":"参与困境:国际环境协定批准实证文献综述","authors":"F. Bellelli, Ashar Aftab, R. Scarpa","doi":"10.1086/722906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several of the most pressing environmental problems involve transboundary issues and can be solved only through international cooperation. Hence, a successful policy response requires a good understanding of international environmental agreements—the primary tool for international cooperation. What motivates participation in environmental agreements, and how can it be increased? These questions have been addressed in economic research, mostly using game theoretical approaches, in models that predict the optimal emission abatement and participation levels. Our survey focuses on a contiguous body of work: the empirical literature on environmental treaty participation. The scope of this paper is to compile the first detailed survey of the empirical literature on participation in environmental agreements, summarize its findings, and enable better comparison with theoretical predictions.","PeriodicalId":47676,"journal":{"name":"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"3 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Participation Dilemma: A Survey of the Empirical Literature on International Environmental Agreement Ratification\",\"authors\":\"F. Bellelli, Ashar Aftab, R. Scarpa\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/722906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several of the most pressing environmental problems involve transboundary issues and can be solved only through international cooperation. Hence, a successful policy response requires a good understanding of international environmental agreements—the primary tool for international cooperation. What motivates participation in environmental agreements, and how can it be increased? These questions have been addressed in economic research, mostly using game theoretical approaches, in models that predict the optimal emission abatement and participation levels. Our survey focuses on a contiguous body of work: the empirical literature on environmental treaty participation. The scope of this paper is to compile the first detailed survey of the empirical literature on participation in environmental agreements, summarize its findings, and enable better comparison with theoretical predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/722906\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

一些最紧迫的环境问题涉及跨界问题,只能通过国际合作加以解决。因此,一个成功的政策反应需要对国际环境协议有很好的理解,这是国际合作的主要工具。参与环境协议的动机是什么?如何才能增加这种参与?这些问题已经在经济研究中得到了解决,主要是使用博弈论方法,在预测最佳减排和参与水平的模型中。我们的调查集中在一个连续的工作体:关于环境条约参与的实证文献。本文的范围是对参与环境协议的实证文献进行首次详细调查,总结其研究结果,并与理论预测进行更好的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Participation Dilemma: A Survey of the Empirical Literature on International Environmental Agreement Ratification
Several of the most pressing environmental problems involve transboundary issues and can be solved only through international cooperation. Hence, a successful policy response requires a good understanding of international environmental agreements—the primary tool for international cooperation. What motivates participation in environmental agreements, and how can it be increased? These questions have been addressed in economic research, mostly using game theoretical approaches, in models that predict the optimal emission abatement and participation levels. Our survey focuses on a contiguous body of work: the empirical literature on environmental treaty participation. The scope of this paper is to compile the first detailed survey of the empirical literature on participation in environmental agreements, summarize its findings, and enable better comparison with theoretical predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Review of Environmental Economics and Policy fills the gap between traditional academic journals and the general interest press by providing a widely accessible yet scholarly source for the latest thinking on environmental economics and related policy. The Review publishes symposia, articles, and regular features that contribute to one or more of the following goals: •to identify and synthesize lessons learned from recent and ongoing environmental economics research; •to provide economic analysis of environmental policy issues; •to promote the sharing of ideas and perspectives among the various sub-fields of environmental economics;
期刊最新文献
How Effective Are Secondary Interventions at Improving Health Outcomes In Children Exposed to Lead in Early Childhood? Environmental and Natural Resource Economics and Systemic Racism The Fiscal Implications of the US Transition Away from Fossil Fuels What Drives and Stops Deforestation, Reforestation, and Forest Degradation? An Updated Meta-analysis Climate Change, Epidemics, and Inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1