为什么邪恶天才的粉丝仍然是粉丝:理查德·瓦格纳和拜罗伊特音乐节的案例

IF 1.4 1区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Cultural Sociology Pub Date : 2022-07-27 DOI:10.1177/17499755221085153
Philip Smith, F. Stoll
{"title":"为什么邪恶天才的粉丝仍然是粉丝:理查德·瓦格纳和拜罗伊特音乐节的案例","authors":"Philip Smith, F. Stoll","doi":"10.1177/17499755221085153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An enduring feature of public life has been the social death of prominent artists, impresarios and entertainers after moral transgressions. But not everyone is shunned. Often fans and general audiences continue to consume, advocate and revere the artistic product of tainted but gifted individuals. How is this love of the ‘evil genius’ possible? The article provides answers with reference to the paradigm case of Richard Wagner and the Bayreuth Festival that he founded. The composer and event remain contaminated by deep association with antisemitism, Hitler and the Third Reich. We draw from an interview study with Wagner fans and opera connoisseurs to report on the interpretative techniques, justifications and folk-logics through which Wagner’s operas can still be listened to and found pleasurable in light of a troubled history. These involve articulations between and over four domains: (i) self (ii) artwork (iii) artist and (iv) history. These are variously connected and disconnected. We speculate that this four-factor model will be applicable in other domains where art, politics and morality make for uneasy bedfellows and the ‘evil genius’ remains culturally salient.","PeriodicalId":46722,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Sociology","volume":"17 1","pages":"351 - 372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Fans of the Evil Genius Remain Fans: The Case of Richard Wagner and the Bayreuth Festival\",\"authors\":\"Philip Smith, F. Stoll\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17499755221085153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An enduring feature of public life has been the social death of prominent artists, impresarios and entertainers after moral transgressions. But not everyone is shunned. Often fans and general audiences continue to consume, advocate and revere the artistic product of tainted but gifted individuals. How is this love of the ‘evil genius’ possible? The article provides answers with reference to the paradigm case of Richard Wagner and the Bayreuth Festival that he founded. The composer and event remain contaminated by deep association with antisemitism, Hitler and the Third Reich. We draw from an interview study with Wagner fans and opera connoisseurs to report on the interpretative techniques, justifications and folk-logics through which Wagner’s operas can still be listened to and found pleasurable in light of a troubled history. These involve articulations between and over four domains: (i) self (ii) artwork (iii) artist and (iv) history. These are variously connected and disconnected. We speculate that this four-factor model will be applicable in other domains where art, politics and morality make for uneasy bedfellows and the ‘evil genius’ remains culturally salient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Sociology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"351 - 372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755221085153\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755221085153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共生活的一个经久不衰的特点是,杰出的艺术家、经理和演艺人员在道德沦丧后在社会上死亡。但并非所有人都被回避。通常,粉丝和普通观众会继续消费、倡导和尊重那些被玷污但有天赋的个人的艺术作品。这种对“邪恶天才”的爱是怎么可能的?本文以理查德·瓦格纳和他创立的拜罗伊特音乐节为例给出了答案。这位作曲家和这一事件仍然与反犹主义、希特勒和第三帝国有着深刻的联系。我们从对瓦格纳的粉丝和歌剧鉴赏家的访谈研究中得出结论,报告瓦格纳歌剧的解释技巧、理由和民间逻辑,通过这些解释,人们仍然可以听到瓦格纳的歌剧,并在一段动荡的历史中找到乐趣。这些涉及四个领域之间和以上的衔接:(i)自我(ii)艺术品(iii)艺术家和(iv)历史。这些是不同的连接和断开。我们推测,这个四因素模型将适用于其他领域,在这些领域中,艺术、政治和道德使人不安,而“邪恶天才”在文化上仍然突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why Fans of the Evil Genius Remain Fans: The Case of Richard Wagner and the Bayreuth Festival
An enduring feature of public life has been the social death of prominent artists, impresarios and entertainers after moral transgressions. But not everyone is shunned. Often fans and general audiences continue to consume, advocate and revere the artistic product of tainted but gifted individuals. How is this love of the ‘evil genius’ possible? The article provides answers with reference to the paradigm case of Richard Wagner and the Bayreuth Festival that he founded. The composer and event remain contaminated by deep association with antisemitism, Hitler and the Third Reich. We draw from an interview study with Wagner fans and opera connoisseurs to report on the interpretative techniques, justifications and folk-logics through which Wagner’s operas can still be listened to and found pleasurable in light of a troubled history. These involve articulations between and over four domains: (i) self (ii) artwork (iii) artist and (iv) history. These are variously connected and disconnected. We speculate that this four-factor model will be applicable in other domains where art, politics and morality make for uneasy bedfellows and the ‘evil genius’ remains culturally salient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Sociology
Cultural Sociology SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Cultural Sociology publishes empirically oriented, theoretically sophisticated, methodologically rigorous papers, which explore from a broad set of sociological perspectives a diverse range of socio-cultural forces, phenomena, institutions and contexts. The objective of Cultural Sociology is to publish original articles which advance the field of cultural sociology and the sociology of culture. The journal seeks to consolidate, develop and promote the arena of sociological understandings of culture, and is intended to be pivotal in defining both what this arena is like currently and what it could become in the future. Cultural Sociology will publish innovative, sociologically-informed work concerned with cultural processes and artefacts, broadly defined.
期刊最新文献
The ‘Not Quite’ as a Form of Relationality Eugenics and the Racialisation of ‘White Eastern Europeans’ Central European Populists and the Racialization of Various Others When, How, and in Relation to Whom is ‘Race’ at Play in Invocations of ‘Eastern Europe’? ‘Eastern Europeanism’: A Rethinking of ‘Race and Racism’ by and Against White People from Central and Eastern Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1