难治性神经性疼痛的皮质运动表征和皮质兴奋性研究

Pain Research Pub Date : 2019-03-30 DOI:10.11154/PAIN.34.57
N. Mori, K. Hosomi, R. Takeuchi, Chanseok Lim, T. Mano, A. Matsugi, H. Kishima, Y. Saitoh
{"title":"难治性神经性疼痛的皮质运动表征和皮质兴奋性研究","authors":"N. Mori, K. Hosomi, R. Takeuchi, Chanseok Lim, T. Mano, A. Matsugi, H. Kishima, Y. Saitoh","doi":"10.11154/PAIN.34.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex has been shown to provide an analgesic effect on refractory neuropathic pain. It is thought that the primary motor cortex may be involved in pain–related cognitive processing. In this study, navigation–guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to investigate cortical motor representation and cortical excitability related to pain. Methods: Subjects were seven patients with refractory neuropathic pain (60.4 ± 13.5 years; stroke, n=5 ; peripheral nerve injury, n=1 ; brachial plexus avulsion, n=1). Pain intensity was measured using a visual analog scale, a numeric rating scale and the short–form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF–MPQ–2). We measured motor representation and cortical excitability assessed by motor evoked potentials with navigation–guided TMS around the primary motor cortex. A resting motor threshold (RMT), and motor map area and extent were measured in the both hemispheres. The relations between pain assessment items and each measurement (the RMT ratio of affected hemisphere (AH) to unaffected hemisphere (UH), AH ⁄ UH area ratio, and AH ⁄ UH extent ratio) were examined. Results : The RMT of AH trended to be higher than that of UH (p=0.07). The AH ⁄ UH area ratio significantly correlated to SF–MPQ2 (rs=−0.85, p=0.02). The other analyses showed no significant correlations between pain assessment items and each measurement with TMS. Conclusions: This study suggested that refractory neuropathic pain might lead to changes of cortical motor representation and cortical excitability.","PeriodicalId":41148,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of cortical motor representation and cortical excitability in refractory neuropathic pain\",\"authors\":\"N. Mori, K. Hosomi, R. Takeuchi, Chanseok Lim, T. Mano, A. Matsugi, H. Kishima, Y. Saitoh\",\"doi\":\"10.11154/PAIN.34.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex has been shown to provide an analgesic effect on refractory neuropathic pain. It is thought that the primary motor cortex may be involved in pain–related cognitive processing. In this study, navigation–guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to investigate cortical motor representation and cortical excitability related to pain. Methods: Subjects were seven patients with refractory neuropathic pain (60.4 ± 13.5 years; stroke, n=5 ; peripheral nerve injury, n=1 ; brachial plexus avulsion, n=1). Pain intensity was measured using a visual analog scale, a numeric rating scale and the short–form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF–MPQ–2). We measured motor representation and cortical excitability assessed by motor evoked potentials with navigation–guided TMS around the primary motor cortex. A resting motor threshold (RMT), and motor map area and extent were measured in the both hemispheres. The relations between pain assessment items and each measurement (the RMT ratio of affected hemisphere (AH) to unaffected hemisphere (UH), AH ⁄ UH area ratio, and AH ⁄ UH extent ratio) were examined. Results : The RMT of AH trended to be higher than that of UH (p=0.07). The AH ⁄ UH area ratio significantly correlated to SF–MPQ2 (rs=−0.85, p=0.02). The other analyses showed no significant correlations between pain assessment items and each measurement with TMS. Conclusions: This study suggested that refractory neuropathic pain might lead to changes of cortical motor representation and cortical excitability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11154/PAIN.34.57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11154/PAIN.34.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:重复经颅磁刺激初级运动皮质已被证明提供了一种镇痛效果难治性神经性疼痛。人们认为初级运动皮层可能参与疼痛相关的认知加工。本研究采用导航引导的经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究与疼痛相关的皮质运动表征和皮质兴奋性。方法:选取7例难治性神经性疼痛患者(60.4±13.5岁;笔画,n=5;周围神经损伤,n=1;臂丛撕脱,n=1)。疼痛强度采用视觉模拟量表、数字评定量表和简短的McGill疼痛问卷2 (SF-MPQ-2)进行测量。我们测量了运动表征和皮层兴奋性,用导航引导的TMS在初级运动皮层周围测量了运动诱发电位。在两脑半球测量静息运动阈值(RMT)和运动图面积和范围。检查疼痛评估项目与各测量指标(受影响半球(AH)与未受影响半球(UH)的RMT比、AH / UH面积比、AH / UH程度比)之间的关系。结果:AH的RMT有高于UH的趋势(p=0.07)。AH / UH面积比与SF-MPQ2显著相关(rs= - 0.85, p=0.02)。其他分析结果显示,疼痛评估项目与经颅磁刺激的各测量结果之间无显著相关性。结论:本研究提示顽固性神经性疼痛可能导致皮质运动表征和皮质兴奋性的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study of cortical motor representation and cortical excitability in refractory neuropathic pain
Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex has been shown to provide an analgesic effect on refractory neuropathic pain. It is thought that the primary motor cortex may be involved in pain–related cognitive processing. In this study, navigation–guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to investigate cortical motor representation and cortical excitability related to pain. Methods: Subjects were seven patients with refractory neuropathic pain (60.4 ± 13.5 years; stroke, n=5 ; peripheral nerve injury, n=1 ; brachial plexus avulsion, n=1). Pain intensity was measured using a visual analog scale, a numeric rating scale and the short–form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF–MPQ–2). We measured motor representation and cortical excitability assessed by motor evoked potentials with navigation–guided TMS around the primary motor cortex. A resting motor threshold (RMT), and motor map area and extent were measured in the both hemispheres. The relations between pain assessment items and each measurement (the RMT ratio of affected hemisphere (AH) to unaffected hemisphere (UH), AH ⁄ UH area ratio, and AH ⁄ UH extent ratio) were examined. Results : The RMT of AH trended to be higher than that of UH (p=0.07). The AH ⁄ UH area ratio significantly correlated to SF–MPQ2 (rs=−0.85, p=0.02). The other analyses showed no significant correlations between pain assessment items and each measurement with TMS. Conclusions: This study suggested that refractory neuropathic pain might lead to changes of cortical motor representation and cortical excitability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research
Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Interaction between dorsal horn neuron subsets operated by a neuropeptide Y and prodynorphin promoter and its contribution to Aβ fiber–induced allodynia–like behavior in rats Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Outcomes of 707 cervical selective nerve root blocks using a fluoroscopy–guided posterolateral oblique approach Exploratory study of factors affecting quality of life among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A cross–sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1