直接入住或转入血栓切除中心的大血管闭塞患者的血栓溶解:一项基于人群的研究

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1161/svin.122.000760
Á. García‐Tornel, P. Lozano, M. Rubiera, M. Requena, M. Olivé-Gadea, M. Muchada, J. Juega, F. Rizzo, N. Rodriguez-villatoro, J. Pagola, D. Rodríguez-Luna, S. Boned, L. Dorado, Xavier Jiménez, Angels Soto, P. Cardona, X. Urra, Á. Chamorro, F. Purroy, M. Terceño, Y. Silva, A. Flores, X. Ustrell, J. Zaragoza, J. Roquer, J. Kuprinski, D. Cocho, E. Palomeras, M. Gómez-Choco, D. Cánovas, J. Martí-Fàbregas, Natalia Más, S. Abilleira, C. Molina, M. Ribó, N. P. de la Ossa
{"title":"直接入住或转入血栓切除中心的大血管闭塞患者的血栓溶解:一项基于人群的研究","authors":"Á. García‐Tornel, P. Lozano, M. Rubiera, M. Requena, M. Olivé-Gadea, M. Muchada, J. Juega, F. Rizzo, N. Rodriguez-villatoro, J. Pagola, D. Rodríguez-Luna, S. Boned, L. Dorado, Xavier Jiménez, Angels Soto, P. Cardona, X. Urra, Á. Chamorro, F. Purroy, M. Terceño, Y. Silva, A. Flores, X. Ustrell, J. Zaragoza, J. Roquer, J. Kuprinski, D. Cocho, E. Palomeras, M. Gómez-Choco, D. Cánovas, J. Martí-Fàbregas, Natalia Más, S. Abilleira, C. Molina, M. Ribó, N. P. de la Ossa","doi":"10.1161/svin.122.000760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Our goal is to evaluate whether the administration of thrombolytic treatment has varying effects on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with large‐vessel occlusion stroke, based on the type of stroke center where the treatment was given (thrombectomy‐capable center versus local stroke center).\n \n \n \n We included patients with an acute ischemic large‐vessel occlusion stroke who were directly admitted to thrombectomy‐capable centers and treated with endovascular thrombectomy, or were transferred from local stroke centers as thrombectomy candidates, in Catalonia, Spain, between 2017 and 2021. The primary outcome was the shift analysis on the modified Rankin scale score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included death at 90 days and the rate of parenchymal hemorrhage and successful reperfusion. Inverse‐probability weighting clustered at the type of stroke center was used to estimate the effects.\n \n \n \n \n The analysis included 2268 patients directly admitted to thrombectomy‐capable centers, of whom 975 (49%) were treated with thrombolysis, and 938 patients transferred from local stroke centers, of whom 580 (66%) were treated with thrombolysis and 616 (67%) were treated with thrombectomy. Mean age was 72 (SD ±13) years, median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (interquartile range, 12–21), and 1363 patients were women (48%). Patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis were younger, had shorter time from onset to first image, higher Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, and lower rates of wake‐up stroke, atrial fibrillation, and anticoagulation intake. Patients treated with thrombolysis had better functional outcome at 90 days, with no difference between patients directly admitted to thrombectomy‐capable centers (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR], 1.50 [95% CI, 1.24–1.81]) and patients transferred from local stroke centers (acOR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.04–2.01]). Patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis had lower death rate, higher rate of parenchymal hematoma, and similar rate of successful reperfusion, with no difference according to type of center (\n P\n interaction\n >0.1).\n \n \n \n \n Administration of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with a large‐vessel stroke with intention of thrombectomy was associated with lower degrees of disability, lower death rate, and higher rates of parenchymal hematoma both in thrombectomy‐capable centers and in local stroke centers.\n","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrombolysis in Patients With Large‐Vessel Occlusion Directly Admitted or Transferred to a Thrombectomy Center: A Population‐Based Study\",\"authors\":\"Á. García‐Tornel, P. Lozano, M. Rubiera, M. Requena, M. Olivé-Gadea, M. Muchada, J. Juega, F. Rizzo, N. Rodriguez-villatoro, J. Pagola, D. Rodríguez-Luna, S. Boned, L. Dorado, Xavier Jiménez, Angels Soto, P. Cardona, X. Urra, Á. Chamorro, F. Purroy, M. Terceño, Y. Silva, A. Flores, X. Ustrell, J. Zaragoza, J. Roquer, J. Kuprinski, D. Cocho, E. Palomeras, M. Gómez-Choco, D. Cánovas, J. Martí-Fàbregas, Natalia Más, S. Abilleira, C. Molina, M. Ribó, N. P. de la Ossa\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.122.000760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Our goal is to evaluate whether the administration of thrombolytic treatment has varying effects on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with large‐vessel occlusion stroke, based on the type of stroke center where the treatment was given (thrombectomy‐capable center versus local stroke center).\\n \\n \\n \\n We included patients with an acute ischemic large‐vessel occlusion stroke who were directly admitted to thrombectomy‐capable centers and treated with endovascular thrombectomy, or were transferred from local stroke centers as thrombectomy candidates, in Catalonia, Spain, between 2017 and 2021. The primary outcome was the shift analysis on the modified Rankin scale score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included death at 90 days and the rate of parenchymal hemorrhage and successful reperfusion. Inverse‐probability weighting clustered at the type of stroke center was used to estimate the effects.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n The analysis included 2268 patients directly admitted to thrombectomy‐capable centers, of whom 975 (49%) were treated with thrombolysis, and 938 patients transferred from local stroke centers, of whom 580 (66%) were treated with thrombolysis and 616 (67%) were treated with thrombectomy. Mean age was 72 (SD ±13) years, median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (interquartile range, 12–21), and 1363 patients were women (48%). Patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis were younger, had shorter time from onset to first image, higher Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, and lower rates of wake‐up stroke, atrial fibrillation, and anticoagulation intake. Patients treated with thrombolysis had better functional outcome at 90 days, with no difference between patients directly admitted to thrombectomy‐capable centers (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR], 1.50 [95% CI, 1.24–1.81]) and patients transferred from local stroke centers (acOR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.04–2.01]). Patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis had lower death rate, higher rate of parenchymal hematoma, and similar rate of successful reperfusion, with no difference according to type of center (\\n P\\n interaction\\n >0.1).\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Administration of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with a large‐vessel stroke with intention of thrombectomy was associated with lower degrees of disability, lower death rate, and higher rates of parenchymal hematoma both in thrombectomy‐capable centers and in local stroke centers.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.122.000760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.122.000760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标是根据接受治疗的卒中中心类型(血栓切除中心与局部卒中中心),评估溶栓治疗是否对大血管闭塞性卒中患者的临床和放射学结果产生不同影响。我们纳入了2017年至2021年间在西班牙加泰罗尼亚直接入住血栓切除中心并接受血管内血栓切除术治疗的急性缺血性大血管闭塞性卒中患者,或从当地卒中中心作为血栓切除术候选者转移的患者。主要结果是在90天时对修改后的Rankin量表评分进行移位分析。次要结果包括90天时的死亡、实质出血率和再灌注成功率。使用按中风中心类型聚类的逆概率加权来估计影响。该分析包括2268名直接入住血栓切除中心的患者,其中975名(49%)接受了溶栓治疗,938名患者从当地中风中心转移,其中580名(66%)接受了血栓溶解治疗,616名(67%)接受了动脉血栓切除治疗。平均年龄为72岁(SD±13),美国国家卫生研究所卒中量表评分中位数为17分(四分位间距,12-21),1363名患者为女性(48%)。接受静脉溶栓治疗的患者更年轻,从发病到首次成像的时间更短,阿尔伯塔省卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分更高,苏醒期卒中、心房颤动和抗凝药物摄入率更低。接受溶栓治疗的患者在90天时有更好的功能结果,直接入住血栓切除中心的患者(调整后的共同优势比[acOR],1.50[95%CI,1.24-1.81])和从当地卒中中心转移的患者(acOR,1.44[95%CI、1.04-2.01])之间没有差异,更高的实质血肿发生率和相似的再灌注成功率,根据中心类型没有差异(P交互作用>0.1)。对意图切除血栓的大血管卒中患者进行静脉溶栓治疗与较低的残疾程度、较低的死亡率、,血栓切除中心和局部卒中中心的实质血肿发生率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thrombolysis in Patients With Large‐Vessel Occlusion Directly Admitted or Transferred to a Thrombectomy Center: A Population‐Based Study
Our goal is to evaluate whether the administration of thrombolytic treatment has varying effects on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with large‐vessel occlusion stroke, based on the type of stroke center where the treatment was given (thrombectomy‐capable center versus local stroke center). We included patients with an acute ischemic large‐vessel occlusion stroke who were directly admitted to thrombectomy‐capable centers and treated with endovascular thrombectomy, or were transferred from local stroke centers as thrombectomy candidates, in Catalonia, Spain, between 2017 and 2021. The primary outcome was the shift analysis on the modified Rankin scale score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included death at 90 days and the rate of parenchymal hemorrhage and successful reperfusion. Inverse‐probability weighting clustered at the type of stroke center was used to estimate the effects. The analysis included 2268 patients directly admitted to thrombectomy‐capable centers, of whom 975 (49%) were treated with thrombolysis, and 938 patients transferred from local stroke centers, of whom 580 (66%) were treated with thrombolysis and 616 (67%) were treated with thrombectomy. Mean age was 72 (SD ±13) years, median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (interquartile range, 12–21), and 1363 patients were women (48%). Patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis were younger, had shorter time from onset to first image, higher Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, and lower rates of wake‐up stroke, atrial fibrillation, and anticoagulation intake. Patients treated with thrombolysis had better functional outcome at 90 days, with no difference between patients directly admitted to thrombectomy‐capable centers (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR], 1.50 [95% CI, 1.24–1.81]) and patients transferred from local stroke centers (acOR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.04–2.01]). Patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis had lower death rate, higher rate of parenchymal hematoma, and similar rate of successful reperfusion, with no difference according to type of center ( P interaction >0.1). Administration of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with a large‐vessel stroke with intention of thrombectomy was associated with lower degrees of disability, lower death rate, and higher rates of parenchymal hematoma both in thrombectomy‐capable centers and in local stroke centers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of HEmorrhage on CT versus MRI After ThrombEctomy: The HECATE study. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Therapy Effectiveness for Unruptured Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms. Large, Wide-Neck, Side-Wall Aneurysm Treatment in Canines Using NeuroCURE: A Novel Liquid Embolic. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual CLOTS Meeting: CLOTS 7.0, Madrid, Spain Catching Up With Time: Endovascular Treatment Beyond 24 Hours
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1