MCDM 50年的反思:问题与未来研究需求

IF 3 Q3 MANAGEMENT EURO Journal on Decision Processes Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100030
Simon French
{"title":"MCDM 50年的反思:问题与未来研究需求","authors":"Simon French","doi":"10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Modern discussions of multiple criteria decision-making extend back about half a century. I reflect on key developments, schools of thought and controversies that have taken place over the period, arguing that perhaps those of us in different schools focus too much on our differences and do not capitalise enough on what we share in common. Moreover, the differences between schools are indications of their respective weaknesses and can drive improvements in each. The discussion points to a number of issues and research needs that the community needs to address.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44104,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100030"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on 50 years of MCDM: Issues and future research needs\",\"authors\":\"Simon French\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Modern discussions of multiple criteria decision-making extend back about half a century. I reflect on key developments, schools of thought and controversies that have taken place over the period, arguing that perhaps those of us in different schools focus too much on our differences and do not capitalise enough on what we share in common. Moreover, the differences between schools are indications of their respective weaknesses and can drive improvements in each. The discussion points to a number of issues and research needs that the community needs to address.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EURO Journal on Decision Processes\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EURO Journal on Decision Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943823000031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943823000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

关于多标准决策的现代讨论可以追溯到大约半个世纪前。我反思了这一时期发生的关键发展、思想流派和争议,认为也许我们这些不同流派的人过于关注我们的差异,没有充分利用我们的共同点。此外,学校之间的差异表明了它们各自的弱点,并可以推动每一所学校的改进。讨论指出了社区需要解决的一些问题和研究需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reflections on 50 years of MCDM: Issues and future research needs

Modern discussions of multiple criteria decision-making extend back about half a century. I reflect on key developments, schools of thought and controversies that have taken place over the period, arguing that perhaps those of us in different schools focus too much on our differences and do not capitalise enough on what we share in common. Moreover, the differences between schools are indications of their respective weaknesses and can drive improvements in each. The discussion points to a number of issues and research needs that the community needs to address.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
A stage-gate decision process for guiding the development of AI solutions for preventive maintenance Projecting decisions. Unfolding architectural design practice in decision-making processes Preferential knowledge for multi-criteria decision making: Stability and consistency of decision rules and weights Real-world relevance of multicriteria decision analysis applied to environmental problems: A critical review of operational research literature Electric vehicle purchase decision: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1