税收裁定中的选择性优势标准:走向对选择性更连贯、更深入的分析之路

N. Fernández
{"title":"税收裁定中的选择性优势标准:走向对选择性更连贯、更深入的分析之路","authors":"N. Fernández","doi":"10.1093/JECLAP/LPAB018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 107(1) TFEU has long prohibited, as incompatible with the internal market, the granting of aid by Member States or through State resources which, by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods, is capable of distorting competition and affecting trade between Member States. According to the settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’),1 this provision limits Member States’ exclusive competence in the field of direct taxation when national tax measures constitute fiscal State aid and gives the EU legitimacy to ensure State aid control.2 Therefore, although Member States remain generally competent to decide on their economic policy and the tax system they deem more suitable,3 they must exercise this competence in compliance with EU law.4 This includes ensuring that national tax measures, such as tax rulings, respect State aid rules.5 The Commission’s involvement in the field of direct taxation became apparent at the end of the 1990s. After the publication of its Notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation,6 the Commission adopted a series of negative decisions finding that several Member States had adopted","PeriodicalId":51907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/JECLAP/LPAB018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Selective Advantage Criterion in Tax Rulings: The Path Towards a More Coherent and Thorough Analysis of Selectivity\",\"authors\":\"N. Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JECLAP/LPAB018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article 107(1) TFEU has long prohibited, as incompatible with the internal market, the granting of aid by Member States or through State resources which, by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods, is capable of distorting competition and affecting trade between Member States. According to the settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’),1 this provision limits Member States’ exclusive competence in the field of direct taxation when national tax measures constitute fiscal State aid and gives the EU legitimacy to ensure State aid control.2 Therefore, although Member States remain generally competent to decide on their economic policy and the tax system they deem more suitable,3 they must exercise this competence in compliance with EU law.4 This includes ensuring that national tax measures, such as tax rulings, respect State aid rules.5 The Commission’s involvement in the field of direct taxation became apparent at the end of the 1990s. After the publication of its Notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation,6 the Commission adopted a series of negative decisions finding that several Member States had adopted\",\"PeriodicalId\":51907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/JECLAP/LPAB018\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JECLAP/LPAB018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JECLAP/LPAB018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

TFEU第107条第(1)款长期以来一直禁止成员国或通过国家资源提供援助,因为这与内部市场不相容,因为这些援助有利于某些企业或某些商品的生产,可能扭曲竞争并影响成员国之间的贸易。根据欧洲联盟法院的既定判例法,1当国家税收措施构成财政国家援助时,这一规定限制了成员国在直接税领域的专属权限,并赋予欧盟确保国家援助控制的合法性。2因此,尽管成员国通常仍有权决定其经济政策和他们认为更合适的税收制度,3但它们必须根据欧盟法律行使这一权限。4这包括确保国家税收措施,如税收裁决,尊重国家援助规则。5委员会在直接税领域的参与在20世纪90年代末变得明显。委员会在其关于将国家援助规则适用于与企业直接税有关的措施的通知6公布后,通过了一系列否定性决定,认定若干会员国已通过
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Selective Advantage Criterion in Tax Rulings: The Path Towards a More Coherent and Thorough Analysis of Selectivity
Article 107(1) TFEU has long prohibited, as incompatible with the internal market, the granting of aid by Member States or through State resources which, by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods, is capable of distorting competition and affecting trade between Member States. According to the settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’),1 this provision limits Member States’ exclusive competence in the field of direct taxation when national tax measures constitute fiscal State aid and gives the EU legitimacy to ensure State aid control.2 Therefore, although Member States remain generally competent to decide on their economic policy and the tax system they deem more suitable,3 they must exercise this competence in compliance with EU law.4 This includes ensuring that national tax measures, such as tax rulings, respect State aid rules.5 The Commission’s involvement in the field of direct taxation became apparent at the end of the 1990s. After the publication of its Notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation,6 the Commission adopted a series of negative decisions finding that several Member States had adopted
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
The Elephant in the Room Turns Twenty: The Effect on Trade and the Enforcement of the EU Competition Law by the National Competition Authorities Two Paths of Enforcement, Procedural Autonomy and the Risk of Fragmentation Parental Liability and Hold-Separate Commitments: Cases 1407-14/1/12/21 Allergan and Others v Competition and Markets Authority, [2023] CAT 56 Reviving Interim Measures in EU Antitrust Proceedings European Commission Requests for Information Ordering the Production of Internal Documents Responsive to Search Terms: Cases T-451/20 and T-452/20 Meta v Commission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1