空间技能和数学态度的性别差异与数学成功的关系:一个生物心理社会模型

IF 5.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Developmental Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dr.2021.100963
Beth M. Casey , Colleen M. Ganley
{"title":"空间技能和数学态度的性别差异与数学成功的关系:一个生物心理社会模型","authors":"Beth M. Casey ,&nbsp;Colleen M. Ganley","doi":"10.1016/j.dr.2021.100963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are extensive controversies about: (1) whether any gender differences in math exist, (2) what factors might contribute to any gender differences, and (3) whether gender differences in abilities and attitudes are likely to impact the substantially smaller number of women in math intensive Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. We provide a review of gender differences in math, describing the inconsistencies and disagreements in the literature, which we propose can often be tied to the population being studied or to features relating to the math measures being used. Then we address two potential areas of gender differences (spatial skills and math attitudes), which may be critical in influencing gender differences in math within certain populations and types of math skills. Next, this article compares key gender-math theories, analyzing them from a bio-psycho-social framework. These findings are discussed within the context of our bio-psycho-social theory of gender differences in both math skills and STEM fields. In an overview of our bio-psycho-social theory, we propose that it is relative tilt in patterns of brain organization relating to spatial versus verbal abilities (rather than math versus verbal abilities tilt) that leads to gender differences in math behaviors and attitudes. This relative spatial-verbal tilt is likely a key player in influencing math skills/careers. At the end of the article, the educational implications are addressed including implications for interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48214,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Review","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 100963"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100963","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An examination of gender differences in spatial skills and math attitudes in relation to mathematics success: A bio-psycho-social model\",\"authors\":\"Beth M. Casey ,&nbsp;Colleen M. Ganley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dr.2021.100963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There are extensive controversies about: (1) whether any gender differences in math exist, (2) what factors might contribute to any gender differences, and (3) whether gender differences in abilities and attitudes are likely to impact the substantially smaller number of women in math intensive Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. We provide a review of gender differences in math, describing the inconsistencies and disagreements in the literature, which we propose can often be tied to the population being studied or to features relating to the math measures being used. Then we address two potential areas of gender differences (spatial skills and math attitudes), which may be critical in influencing gender differences in math within certain populations and types of math skills. Next, this article compares key gender-math theories, analyzing them from a bio-psycho-social framework. These findings are discussed within the context of our bio-psycho-social theory of gender differences in both math skills and STEM fields. In an overview of our bio-psycho-social theory, we propose that it is relative tilt in patterns of brain organization relating to spatial versus verbal abilities (rather than math versus verbal abilities tilt) that leads to gender differences in math behaviors and attitudes. This relative spatial-verbal tilt is likely a key player in influencing math skills/careers. At the end of the article, the educational implications are addressed including implications for interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Review\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100963\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100963\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229721000186\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229721000186","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

关于(1)数学是否存在性别差异,(2)什么因素可能导致性别差异,以及(3)能力和态度的性别差异是否可能影响在数学密集型科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域中人数少得多的女性,存在广泛的争议。我们对数学中的性别差异进行了回顾,描述了文献中的不一致和分歧,我们认为这通常与被研究的人群或与所使用的数学测量相关的特征有关。然后,我们讨论了两个潜在的性别差异领域(空间技能和数学态度),这可能是影响某些人群和数学技能类型中数学性别差异的关键。其次,本文比较了主要的性别数学理论,从生物-心理-社会的框架来分析它们。这些发现是在我们关于数学技能和STEM领域性别差异的生物心理社会理论的背景下讨论的。在我们的生物心理社会理论的概述中,我们提出,导致数学行为和态度的性别差异的是与空间能力和语言能力相关的大脑组织模式的相对倾斜(而不是数学能力和语言能力的倾斜)。这种相对的空间语言倾向可能是影响数学技能/职业的关键因素。在文章的最后,讨论了教育意义,包括干预的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An examination of gender differences in spatial skills and math attitudes in relation to mathematics success: A bio-psycho-social model

There are extensive controversies about: (1) whether any gender differences in math exist, (2) what factors might contribute to any gender differences, and (3) whether gender differences in abilities and attitudes are likely to impact the substantially smaller number of women in math intensive Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. We provide a review of gender differences in math, describing the inconsistencies and disagreements in the literature, which we propose can often be tied to the population being studied or to features relating to the math measures being used. Then we address two potential areas of gender differences (spatial skills and math attitudes), which may be critical in influencing gender differences in math within certain populations and types of math skills. Next, this article compares key gender-math theories, analyzing them from a bio-psycho-social framework. These findings are discussed within the context of our bio-psycho-social theory of gender differences in both math skills and STEM fields. In an overview of our bio-psycho-social theory, we propose that it is relative tilt in patterns of brain organization relating to spatial versus verbal abilities (rather than math versus verbal abilities tilt) that leads to gender differences in math behaviors and attitudes. This relative spatial-verbal tilt is likely a key player in influencing math skills/careers. At the end of the article, the educational implications are addressed including implications for interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Review
Developmental Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Presenting research that bears on important conceptual issues in developmental psychology, Developmental Review: Perspectives in Behavior and Cognition provides child and developmental, child clinical, and educational psychologists with authoritative articles that reflect current thinking and cover significant scientific developments. The journal emphasizes human developmental processes and gives particular attention to issues relevant to child developmental psychology. The research concerns issues with important implications for the fields of pediatrics, psychiatry, and education, and increases the understanding of socialization processes.
期刊最新文献
Executive function: Debunking an overprized construct Learning to live in the spatial world: Experience-expectant and experience-dependent input Executive functions and social cognition from early childhood to pre-adolescence: A systematic review Judith Rich Harris and child development: 25 years after The Nurture Assumption Chronicle of deceit: Navigating the developmental cognitive landscape from childhood fabrications to prolific adulthood artistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1