股票组合绩效分析中Sharpe、Treynor和Jensen方法的批判性分析LQ-45股票研究

Qur'anitasari Qur'anitasari, N. F. Nuzula, A. Darmawan
{"title":"股票组合绩效分析中Sharpe、Treynor和Jensen方法的批判性分析LQ-45股票研究","authors":"Qur'anitasari Qur'anitasari, N. F. Nuzula, A. Darmawan","doi":"10.21776/ub.apmba.2019.008.02.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine the stocks of the LQ-45 Index which form a portfolio based on a single index model, analyzed by Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen methods, whether there are differences in the results of calculations and which is the most appropriate in measuring portfolio performance. The method used in this research is descriptive research with a quantitative approach and the data source used is secondary data from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population used is the LQ-45 Index shares for the period 2013-2018 and based on established criteria, a sample of 22 shares was obtained. Based on the methods of Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen, the portfolio performance that is formed experiences a similar and fluctuating movement. Because the three methods produce almost the same value movement, the determination of slope (linear curve) requires accuracy, therefore re-testing is done by using Robustness Test. With the regression analysis it shows that the Sharpe method is most appropriate to be used in measuring portfolio performance in this study. Researchers suggest for further research, in the formation of portfolios can use other portfolio formation models. This research in the formation of LQ-45 stock portfolios using the single index model method, the portfolio formed is only one portfolio each year which causes less number of portfolios compared. In addition to the Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen methods, researchers can then use other performance measurement methods for comparisons, such as M2 (Modigliani-Modigliani) and Information Ratio (RI).","PeriodicalId":31578,"journal":{"name":"APMBA Asia Pacific Management and Business Application","volume":"8 1","pages":"89-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Analysis of Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen Methods in Analyzing Stock Portfolio Performance LQ-45 Stock Studies\",\"authors\":\"Qur'anitasari Qur'anitasari, N. F. Nuzula, A. Darmawan\",\"doi\":\"10.21776/ub.apmba.2019.008.02.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to determine the stocks of the LQ-45 Index which form a portfolio based on a single index model, analyzed by Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen methods, whether there are differences in the results of calculations and which is the most appropriate in measuring portfolio performance. The method used in this research is descriptive research with a quantitative approach and the data source used is secondary data from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population used is the LQ-45 Index shares for the period 2013-2018 and based on established criteria, a sample of 22 shares was obtained. Based on the methods of Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen, the portfolio performance that is formed experiences a similar and fluctuating movement. Because the three methods produce almost the same value movement, the determination of slope (linear curve) requires accuracy, therefore re-testing is done by using Robustness Test. With the regression analysis it shows that the Sharpe method is most appropriate to be used in measuring portfolio performance in this study. Researchers suggest for further research, in the formation of portfolios can use other portfolio formation models. This research in the formation of LQ-45 stock portfolios using the single index model method, the portfolio formed is only one portfolio each year which causes less number of portfolios compared. In addition to the Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen methods, researchers can then use other performance measurement methods for comparisons, such as M2 (Modigliani-Modigliani) and Information Ratio (RI).\",\"PeriodicalId\":31578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"APMBA Asia Pacific Management and Business Application\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"89-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"APMBA Asia Pacific Management and Business Application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2019.008.02.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APMBA Asia Pacific Management and Business Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2019.008.02.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是根据Sharpe、Treynor和Jensen方法分析的单一指数模型,确定构成投资组合的LQ-45指数股票,计算结果是否存在差异,以及哪种股票最适合衡量投资组合业绩。本研究使用的方法是定量的描述性研究,使用的数据来源是印度尼西亚证券交易所的二次数据。使用的人群是2013-2018年期间的LQ-45指数股票,根据既定标准,获得了22只股票的样本。基于Sharpe、Treynor和Jensen的方法,形成的投资组合业绩经历了类似的波动。由于这三种方法产生的值移动几乎相同,因此斜率(线性曲线)的确定需要准确性,因此使用稳健性测试进行重新测试。回归分析表明,Sharpe方法最适合用于衡量本研究中的投资组合绩效。研究人员建议,为了进一步研究,在形成投资组合时可以使用其他的投资组合形成模型。本研究在LQ-45股票投资组合的形成中采用了单指数模型方法,形成的投资组合每年只有一个投资组合,这导致投资组合数量较少。除了Sharpe、Treynor和Jensen方法外,研究人员还可以使用其他性能测量方法进行比较,如M2(Modigliani Modigliani)和信息比率(RI)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical Analysis of Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen Methods in Analyzing Stock Portfolio Performance LQ-45 Stock Studies
The purpose of this study is to determine the stocks of the LQ-45 Index which form a portfolio based on a single index model, analyzed by Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen methods, whether there are differences in the results of calculations and which is the most appropriate in measuring portfolio performance. The method used in this research is descriptive research with a quantitative approach and the data source used is secondary data from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population used is the LQ-45 Index shares for the period 2013-2018 and based on established criteria, a sample of 22 shares was obtained. Based on the methods of Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen, the portfolio performance that is formed experiences a similar and fluctuating movement. Because the three methods produce almost the same value movement, the determination of slope (linear curve) requires accuracy, therefore re-testing is done by using Robustness Test. With the regression analysis it shows that the Sharpe method is most appropriate to be used in measuring portfolio performance in this study. Researchers suggest for further research, in the formation of portfolios can use other portfolio formation models. This research in the formation of LQ-45 stock portfolios using the single index model method, the portfolio formed is only one portfolio each year which causes less number of portfolios compared. In addition to the Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen methods, researchers can then use other performance measurement methods for comparisons, such as M2 (Modigliani-Modigliani) and Information Ratio (RI).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can Holistic Empowerment and Digital Platform Arouse Creative Economy Innovation? The Cost Leadership, Entrepreneurship Orientation, and Differentiation Strategies of Bali's MSME in Tourism Sector The Phenomenon of BUMN Employee Recruıtment In Indonesıa: Advanced Development of Talent Management Research Trends 2018 – 2021 and Career Development The Effect of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Assessment on Firm Value with Profitability as a Mediating Variable Exploring Tourists’ Booking Intention Through Brand Image, EWOM, and Experiential Marketing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1