所有捕获比率是否相等?

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Index Investing Pub Date : 2021-07-26 DOI:10.3905/jii.2021.1.109
Jeffrey M. Coy, E. Robbins
{"title":"所有捕获比率是否相等?","authors":"Jeffrey M. Coy, E. Robbins","doi":"10.3905/jii.2021.1.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to shed light on a freely published mutual fund screening tool—the capture ratio—and its ability to predict future fund performance (i.e., alpha). This analysis is of interest for both financial advisors and retail investors who deploy mutual fund screening tools. We find that capture ratios measured over shorter periods, such as one year, do not exhibit subsequent performance predictability. Conversely, we find that the three-year and five-year capture ratios are useful for investors in the full sample. However, analysis across cap and style-based fund subsamples shows that this return predictability is most consistent in predicting three- and five-year performance. TOPICS: Mutual funds/passive investing/indexing, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ Capture ratios measured over one year are unreliable in predicting mutual fund performance. ▪ Capture ratios measured over three and five years exhibit consistent performance predictability across cap and style fund subsamples. ▪ Mutual fund investors exhibit a real return-chasing behavior as it relates to capture ratios.","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are All Capture Ratios Created Equal?\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey M. Coy, E. Robbins\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jii.2021.1.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to shed light on a freely published mutual fund screening tool—the capture ratio—and its ability to predict future fund performance (i.e., alpha). This analysis is of interest for both financial advisors and retail investors who deploy mutual fund screening tools. We find that capture ratios measured over shorter periods, such as one year, do not exhibit subsequent performance predictability. Conversely, we find that the three-year and five-year capture ratios are useful for investors in the full sample. However, analysis across cap and style-based fund subsamples shows that this return predictability is most consistent in predicting three- and five-year performance. TOPICS: Mutual funds/passive investing/indexing, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ Capture ratios measured over one year are unreliable in predicting mutual fund performance. ▪ Capture ratios measured over three and five years exhibit consistent performance predictability across cap and style fund subsamples. ▪ Mutual fund investors exhibit a real return-chasing behavior as it relates to capture ratios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2021.1.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2021.1.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在揭示一种免费发布的共同基金筛选工具——捕获率——及其预测未来基金业绩的能力(即阿尔法)。这一分析对部署共同基金筛选工具的财务顾问和散户投资者都很感兴趣。我们发现,在较短的时间内(如一年)测量的捕获率不会表现出后续性能的可预测性。相反,我们发现三年期和五年期捕获率对全样本投资者有用。然而,对基于上限和风格的基金子样本的分析表明,这种回报可预测性在预测三年和五年业绩时最为一致。主题:共同基金/被动投资/指数化、绩效衡量关键发现▪ 在预测共同基金业绩时,一年内的捕获率是不可靠的。▪ 在三年和五年内测量的捕获率在上限和风格基金子样本中表现出一致的绩效可预测性。▪ 共同基金投资者表现出真正的追逐回报行为,因为这与捕获率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are All Capture Ratios Created Equal?
This study aims to shed light on a freely published mutual fund screening tool—the capture ratio—and its ability to predict future fund performance (i.e., alpha). This analysis is of interest for both financial advisors and retail investors who deploy mutual fund screening tools. We find that capture ratios measured over shorter periods, such as one year, do not exhibit subsequent performance predictability. Conversely, we find that the three-year and five-year capture ratios are useful for investors in the full sample. However, analysis across cap and style-based fund subsamples shows that this return predictability is most consistent in predicting three- and five-year performance. TOPICS: Mutual funds/passive investing/indexing, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ Capture ratios measured over one year are unreliable in predicting mutual fund performance. ▪ Capture ratios measured over three and five years exhibit consistent performance predictability across cap and style fund subsamples. ▪ Mutual fund investors exhibit a real return-chasing behavior as it relates to capture ratios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Index Investing
Journal of Index Investing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Refusal as Repair Australia in the World’s Art Colonies 1900—Pyrrhic Victory Fugitive Abstraction Destruction or Secession?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1