解决种族和毒品犯罪问题:对联邦判决中的安全阀条款的分析

Mai Naito Mills, Anthony G. Vito
{"title":"解决种族和毒品犯罪问题:对联邦判决中的安全阀条款的分析","authors":"Mai Naito Mills, Anthony G. Vito","doi":"10.1080/23774657.2021.1878070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In efforts to understand the Sentencing Reform Act’s effectiveness on federal drug offenses, the current study seeks to determine the application of the safety valve provision in the 2013 federal sentencing data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission. To better analyze the impact of the race, ethnicity, or gender of the defendant, the current study analyzes cases where the safety valve could have been applied in three different models being race/ethnicity of the defendant, legal factors, and then extra-legal factors to understand the judge’s decision-making on applying the safety valve provision under 18 U.S.C. §3553(f). The findings show evidence of racial and gender disparity. Both Black defendants and Black male defendants are less likely to have the safety valve applied in their cases than White defendants and White male defendants. While cases involving a Hispanic defendant and a Hispanic male defendant are more likely to have the safety valve applied.","PeriodicalId":91861,"journal":{"name":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23774657.2021.1878070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing the Issue of Race and Drug Offenses: An Analysis of the Safety Valve Provision in Federal Sentencing\",\"authors\":\"Mai Naito Mills, Anthony G. Vito\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23774657.2021.1878070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In efforts to understand the Sentencing Reform Act’s effectiveness on federal drug offenses, the current study seeks to determine the application of the safety valve provision in the 2013 federal sentencing data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission. To better analyze the impact of the race, ethnicity, or gender of the defendant, the current study analyzes cases where the safety valve could have been applied in three different models being race/ethnicity of the defendant, legal factors, and then extra-legal factors to understand the judge’s decision-making on applying the safety valve provision under 18 U.S.C. §3553(f). The findings show evidence of racial and gender disparity. Both Black defendants and Black male defendants are less likely to have the safety valve applied in their cases than White defendants and White male defendants. While cases involving a Hispanic defendant and a Hispanic male defendant are more likely to have the safety valve applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corrections : policy, practice and research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23774657.2021.1878070\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corrections : policy, practice and research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2021.1878070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2021.1878070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解《量刑改革法案》对联邦毒品犯罪的有效性,本研究试图确定安全阀条款在美国量刑委员会2013年联邦量刑数据中的应用。为了更好地分析被告的种族、民族或性别的影响,本研究分析了安全阀可以在三种不同模式下应用的案例,即被告的种族/民族,法律因素,然后是法外因素,以了解法官在18 U.S.C.§3553(f)下应用安全阀条款的决策。研究结果显示了种族和性别差异的证据。黑人被告和黑人男性被告比白人被告和白人男性被告更不可能在他们的案件中使用安全阀。而涉及西班牙裔被告和西班牙裔男性被告的案件更有可能使用安全阀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Addressing the Issue of Race and Drug Offenses: An Analysis of the Safety Valve Provision in Federal Sentencing
ABSTRACT In efforts to understand the Sentencing Reform Act’s effectiveness on federal drug offenses, the current study seeks to determine the application of the safety valve provision in the 2013 federal sentencing data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission. To better analyze the impact of the race, ethnicity, or gender of the defendant, the current study analyzes cases where the safety valve could have been applied in three different models being race/ethnicity of the defendant, legal factors, and then extra-legal factors to understand the judge’s decision-making on applying the safety valve provision under 18 U.S.C. §3553(f). The findings show evidence of racial and gender disparity. Both Black defendants and Black male defendants are less likely to have the safety valve applied in their cases than White defendants and White male defendants. While cases involving a Hispanic defendant and a Hispanic male defendant are more likely to have the safety valve applied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hands-Off or Hands-On? Examining the Effect of Court Orders on Inmate Misconduct Gender-Responsive Programming for Women in the Community Corrections Context: A Scoping Review Receptivity to Jail-based medication for opioid use disorder among rural detention Administrators The Interplay Between Physical Activity and Psychological, Social, and Perceived Health in Juvenile Corrections Facilities Gender and the Release from Jail: Predicting the Likelihood of a Probation Violation versus a New Offense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1