主张的根财产的个性化及其边界的登记:最高法院,2020年8月13日判决,rol n.º5837-2019,Westlaw CL/JUR/76099/2020

Jaime Alcalde Silva
{"title":"主张的根财产的个性化及其边界的登记:最高法院,2020年8月13日判决,rol n.º5837-2019,Westlaw CL/JUR/76099/2020","authors":"Jaime Alcalde Silva","doi":"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court accepted an appeal on the merits, considering that the piece of land which ownership was claimed was sufficiently specified with the sketch submitted by the plaintiff and prepared by a surveying engineer. That drawing was made according to the boundaries indicated in the registration on the Land Registry, and the topographical survey was corroborated by the personal inspection made by the court. The use of yards as a measure to mark out the boundaries does not prevent the correct specification of the claimed land.","PeriodicalId":36265,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La individualización del bien raíz que se reivindica y el señalamiento registral de sus linderos: Corte Suprema, sentencia de 13 de agosto de 2020, rol n.º 5837-2019, Westlaw CL/JUR/76099/2020\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Alcalde Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Supreme Court accepted an appeal on the merits, considering that the piece of land which ownership was claimed was sufficiently specified with the sketch submitted by the plaintiff and prepared by a surveying engineer. That drawing was made according to the boundaries indicated in the registration on the Land Registry, and the topographical survey was corroborated by the personal inspection made by the court. The use of yards as a measure to mark out the boundaries does not prevent the correct specification of the claimed land.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最高法院受理了关于案情的上诉,认为原告提交并由一名测量工程师绘制的草图充分说明了所声称的所有权。该图纸是根据土地注册处登记中所示的边界绘制的,法院亲自检查证实了地形测量。使用庭院作为划定边界的措施并不妨碍对声称拥有土地的正确规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La individualización del bien raíz que se reivindica y el señalamiento registral de sus linderos: Corte Suprema, sentencia de 13 de agosto de 2020, rol n.º 5837-2019, Westlaw CL/JUR/76099/2020
The Supreme Court accepted an appeal on the merits, considering that the piece of land which ownership was claimed was sufficiently specified with the sketch submitted by the plaintiff and prepared by a surveying engineer. That drawing was made according to the boundaries indicated in the registration on the Land Registry, and the topographical survey was corroborated by the personal inspection made by the court. The use of yards as a measure to mark out the boundaries does not prevent the correct specification of the claimed land.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
EL INTERÉS COMPROMETIDO EN LA DECLARACIÓN DE CLÁUSULAS ABUSIVAS COMO JUSTIFICANTE DE LA ACCIÓN POR EL INTERÉS GENERAL NO RENOVACIONES DE MATRÍCULAS DE NIÑOS, NIÑAS Y ADOLESCENTES CON TRASTORNO DE DÉFICIT ATENCIONAL E HIPERACTIVIDAD: UNO DE LOS PROBLEMAS QUE DEBE RESOLVER una educación verdaderamente inclusiva APLICACIÓN DE LAS NORMAS CONTENIDAS EN LA LEY N.º 19496 A COMUNICACIONES DE NATURALEZA PUBLICITARIA EMITIDAS POR LÍDERES DE OPINIÓN O INFLUENCERS EL LITIGANTE APARENTE EN EL CÓDIGO DE ÉTICA PROFESIONAL DEL COLEGIO DE ABOGADOS DE CHILE A.G. LA CLÁUSULA “SE FACULTA AL PORTADOR” COMO MANDATO INNOMINADO QUE TERMINA CON LA MUERTE DEL COMPRADOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1