脑深部电刺激手术对特发性震颤患者言语及吞咽的影响

J. Kim, J. Hicks, L. Almeida, A. Wagle‐Shukla, Pamela Zeilman, K. Hegland
{"title":"脑深部电刺激手术对特发性震颤患者言语及吞咽的影响","authors":"J. Kim, J. Hicks, L. Almeida, A. Wagle‐Shukla, Pamela Zeilman, K. Hegland","doi":"10.21849/cacd.2021.00318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus is the typical target of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for controlling tremor in essential tremor (ET). It remains unclear whether the outcomes are significantly different on speech and/or swallowing functions. This study was to compare speech and swallowing outcomes in patients with ET without VIM DBS, and those with unilateral/bilateral VIM DBS.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 133 patients with the diagnosis of ET. We analyzed the clinical speech and swallowing evaluations, and compared outcomes across four ‘DBS disposition’ groupings: no DBS, left, right, or bilateral VIM DBS.Results: Speech function was worse in bilateral group versus no DBS and unilateral groups. Orofacial (p=0.000), rate (p=0.001), and prosody (p=0.003) were significantly different between groups. No DBS and unilateral groups demonstrated either no dysarthria or mild hyperkinetic dysarthria versus exhibiting higher rates of dysarthria including an ataxic component in bilateral group. Bilateral group showed more impaired swallowing severity versus no DBS and unilateral groups, however, these differences were not statistically significant.Conclusions: The results demonstrated speech and swallowing changes in the ET patient population after VIM DBS. This data provides support for further study in order to better understand the speech and/or swallowing changes that may occur with VIM DBS.","PeriodicalId":10238,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of deep brain stimulation surgery on speech and swallowing in patients with essential tremor\",\"authors\":\"J. Kim, J. Hicks, L. Almeida, A. Wagle‐Shukla, Pamela Zeilman, K. Hegland\",\"doi\":\"10.21849/cacd.2021.00318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus is the typical target of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for controlling tremor in essential tremor (ET). It remains unclear whether the outcomes are significantly different on speech and/or swallowing functions. This study was to compare speech and swallowing outcomes in patients with ET without VIM DBS, and those with unilateral/bilateral VIM DBS.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 133 patients with the diagnosis of ET. We analyzed the clinical speech and swallowing evaluations, and compared outcomes across four ‘DBS disposition’ groupings: no DBS, left, right, or bilateral VIM DBS.Results: Speech function was worse in bilateral group versus no DBS and unilateral groups. Orofacial (p=0.000), rate (p=0.001), and prosody (p=0.003) were significantly different between groups. No DBS and unilateral groups demonstrated either no dysarthria or mild hyperkinetic dysarthria versus exhibiting higher rates of dysarthria including an ataxic component in bilateral group. Bilateral group showed more impaired swallowing severity versus no DBS and unilateral groups, however, these differences were not statistically significant.Conclusions: The results demonstrated speech and swallowing changes in the ET patient population after VIM DBS. This data provides support for further study in order to better understand the speech and/or swallowing changes that may occur with VIM DBS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21849/cacd.2021.00318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21849/cacd.2021.00318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:丘脑腹侧中间核(VIM)是脑深部刺激(DBS)控制原发性震颤(ET)的典型靶点。目前尚不清楚在言语和/或吞咽功能方面的结果是否有显著差异。本研究旨在比较无VIM-DBS的ET患者和单侧/双侧VIM-DBS患者的言语和吞咽结果。方法:我们对133名诊断为ET的患者进行了回顾性审查。我们分析了临床言语和吞咽评估,并比较了四个“DBS处置”组的结果:无DBS、左侧、右侧或双侧VIM-DBS。结果:双侧组的言语功能较无DBS组和单侧组差。两组之间的口齿(p=0.000)、比率(p=0.001)和韵律(p=0.003)有显著差异。没有DBS和单侧组表现出没有构音障碍或轻度高运动性构音障碍,而双侧组表现出更高的构音障碍发生率,包括共济失调成分。与无DBS组和单侧组相比,双侧组的吞咽受损程度更严重,但这些差异无统计学意义。结论:研究结果表明,VIM-DBS后ET患者群体的言语和吞咽发生了变化。这些数据为进一步研究提供了支持,以便更好地了解VIM-DBS可能发生的言语和/或吞咽变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of deep brain stimulation surgery on speech and swallowing in patients with essential tremor
Purpose: The ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus is the typical target of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for controlling tremor in essential tremor (ET). It remains unclear whether the outcomes are significantly different on speech and/or swallowing functions. This study was to compare speech and swallowing outcomes in patients with ET without VIM DBS, and those with unilateral/bilateral VIM DBS.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 133 patients with the diagnosis of ET. We analyzed the clinical speech and swallowing evaluations, and compared outcomes across four ‘DBS disposition’ groupings: no DBS, left, right, or bilateral VIM DBS.Results: Speech function was worse in bilateral group versus no DBS and unilateral groups. Orofacial (p=0.000), rate (p=0.001), and prosody (p=0.003) were significantly different between groups. No DBS and unilateral groups demonstrated either no dysarthria or mild hyperkinetic dysarthria versus exhibiting higher rates of dysarthria including an ataxic component in bilateral group. Bilateral group showed more impaired swallowing severity versus no DBS and unilateral groups, however, these differences were not statistically significant.Conclusions: The results demonstrated speech and swallowing changes in the ET patient population after VIM DBS. This data provides support for further study in order to better understand the speech and/or swallowing changes that may occur with VIM DBS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders
Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders Health Professions-Speech and Hearing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Parent mediated Group Intervention Program for Developmental Language Disorders Trajectory of Voice Rehabilitation in Ortner’s Syndrome: A Case Report The Effect of Dysphagia on Quality of Life in Stroke Patients The Impact of High-Contact Sports on Memory and Auditory Comprehension in Young Athletes following Sports-Related Concussions Research on the methodology of LSA with preschool children: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1