权利的不人道

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.1080/10848770.2022.2163471
E. Andrew
{"title":"权利的不人道","authors":"E. Andrew","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2022.2163471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"dants do not have the same rights as the Danish-speaking majority for permanent residency, education, and work opportunities. Deep down, this is rooted in the fact that language is a critical means of government manipulation, and thus that language planning is ideologically-driven and politically-motivated. With more immigrants dwelling in Denmark, Faingold calls for re-evaluating “the view that language rights of indigenous minorities necessarily supersede the language rights of minority immigrants” (119). In Chapter 6, Faingold recapitulates the significant research findings and proposes directions for future research. He points out that as time goes by, the potential impacts of Brexit on the development of regional minority languages are also worth investigating. Faingold offers a thorough understanding of linguistic minorities’ language rights in the EU by situating his analyses in various legal, political and social settings. However, his study would have been more effective if he had incorporated other EU member states besides Spain and Denmark into a more comprehensive discussion of language policies. Besides, since the EU member states are given the exclusive right to determine the rights of national minorities, the protections of minority language speakers are subject to political considerations, social factors, and historical circumstances. In other words, proper contextualization is a prerequisite for conceptualizing language rights of indigenous and immigrant minorities in the EU. Despite some imperfections, the book provokes thoughts about possible solutions to address LPP issues in a context of linguistic diversity, such as the author’s own suggestion of making cautious adjustments to language laws and policies to help facilitate the linguistic integration of minorities into the EU.","PeriodicalId":55962,"journal":{"name":"European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Inhumanity of Right\",\"authors\":\"E. Andrew\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10848770.2022.2163471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"dants do not have the same rights as the Danish-speaking majority for permanent residency, education, and work opportunities. Deep down, this is rooted in the fact that language is a critical means of government manipulation, and thus that language planning is ideologically-driven and politically-motivated. With more immigrants dwelling in Denmark, Faingold calls for re-evaluating “the view that language rights of indigenous minorities necessarily supersede the language rights of minority immigrants” (119). In Chapter 6, Faingold recapitulates the significant research findings and proposes directions for future research. He points out that as time goes by, the potential impacts of Brexit on the development of regional minority languages are also worth investigating. Faingold offers a thorough understanding of linguistic minorities’ language rights in the EU by situating his analyses in various legal, political and social settings. However, his study would have been more effective if he had incorporated other EU member states besides Spain and Denmark into a more comprehensive discussion of language policies. Besides, since the EU member states are given the exclusive right to determine the rights of national minorities, the protections of minority language speakers are subject to political considerations, social factors, and historical circumstances. In other words, proper contextualization is a prerequisite for conceptualizing language rights of indigenous and immigrant minorities in the EU. Despite some imperfections, the book provokes thoughts about possible solutions to address LPP issues in a context of linguistic diversity, such as the author’s own suggestion of making cautious adjustments to language laws and policies to help facilitate the linguistic integration of minorities into the EU.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2022.2163471\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2022.2163471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

丹麦人在获得永久居留权、教育和工作机会方面与大多数讲丹麦语的人没有同等权利。从本质上讲,这源于这样一个事实,即语言是政府操纵的关键手段,因此语言规划是由意识形态驱动和政治动机驱动的。随着越来越多的移民居住在丹麦,费恩戈尔德呼吁重新评估“土著少数民族的语言权利必然取代少数民族移民的语言权利的观点”(119)。在第六章中,Faingold总结了重要的研究成果,并提出了未来的研究方向。他指出,随着时间的推移,英国脱欧对地区少数民族语言发展的潜在影响也值得研究。Faingold通过将他的分析置于各种法律、政治和社会环境中,对欧盟语言少数群体的语言权利有了深入的了解。然而,如果他将西班牙和丹麦以外的其他欧盟成员国纳入更全面的语言政策讨论,他的研究会更有效。此外,由于欧盟成员国被赋予决定少数民族权利的专属权利,对少数民族语言使用者的保护受到政治考虑、社会因素和历史环境的影响。换言之,适当的语境化是概念化欧盟土著和移民少数群体语言权利的先决条件。尽管存在一些缺陷,但这本书引发了人们对在语言多样性的背景下解决LPP问题的可能解决方案的思考,例如作者自己建议对语言法律和政策进行谨慎调整,以帮助少数民族在语言上融入欧盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Inhumanity of Right
dants do not have the same rights as the Danish-speaking majority for permanent residency, education, and work opportunities. Deep down, this is rooted in the fact that language is a critical means of government manipulation, and thus that language planning is ideologically-driven and politically-motivated. With more immigrants dwelling in Denmark, Faingold calls for re-evaluating “the view that language rights of indigenous minorities necessarily supersede the language rights of minority immigrants” (119). In Chapter 6, Faingold recapitulates the significant research findings and proposes directions for future research. He points out that as time goes by, the potential impacts of Brexit on the development of regional minority languages are also worth investigating. Faingold offers a thorough understanding of linguistic minorities’ language rights in the EU by situating his analyses in various legal, political and social settings. However, his study would have been more effective if he had incorporated other EU member states besides Spain and Denmark into a more comprehensive discussion of language policies. Besides, since the EU member states are given the exclusive right to determine the rights of national minorities, the protections of minority language speakers are subject to political considerations, social factors, and historical circumstances. In other words, proper contextualization is a prerequisite for conceptualizing language rights of indigenous and immigrant minorities in the EU. Despite some imperfections, the book provokes thoughts about possible solutions to address LPP issues in a context of linguistic diversity, such as the author’s own suggestion of making cautious adjustments to language laws and policies to help facilitate the linguistic integration of minorities into the EU.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms
European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊最新文献
Meeting a Hero Grandmother Zofia’s Table Symphony as Event: The Significance of Political Philosophy On Aging: A Personal Account Joseph Brodsky and the Aesthetic Origins of Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1