战略、智力资本与经营绩效

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Accounting Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3867261
Vasilios-Christos Naoum, Dimitrios Ntounis, Orestes Vlismas
{"title":"战略、智力资本与经营绩效","authors":"Vasilios-Christos Naoum, Dimitrios Ntounis, Orestes Vlismas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3867261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the relationship between intellectual capital (IC) and future operating performance under the prism of different strategic orientations (i.e., prospectors versus defender) and explanations (i.e., investing versus signaling). Our data sample consists of 11,085 firm-year observations of US listed firms for the period 2000–2019. We employed organizational capital and R&D capital as measures of a firm’s IC intensity. It seems that strategy affects the likelihood of a firm to be classified as a low or high IC intensive. Organizational capital improves future operating performance across firms with the same or with different strategic orientations. R&D capital affects primarily prospectors’ future operating performance. Depending on the measure of IC intensity or operating performance, the positive relationship between IC and future operating performance can be explained because either the IC expenditures operate as investments that improve future performance or expectations for improved future operating performance trigger increased IC expenditures.","PeriodicalId":7317,"journal":{"name":"Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy, Intellectual Capital, and Operating Performance\",\"authors\":\"Vasilios-Christos Naoum, Dimitrios Ntounis, Orestes Vlismas\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3867261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores the relationship between intellectual capital (IC) and future operating performance under the prism of different strategic orientations (i.e., prospectors versus defender) and explanations (i.e., investing versus signaling). Our data sample consists of 11,085 firm-year observations of US listed firms for the period 2000–2019. We employed organizational capital and R&D capital as measures of a firm’s IC intensity. It seems that strategy affects the likelihood of a firm to be classified as a low or high IC intensive. Organizational capital improves future operating performance across firms with the same or with different strategic orientations. R&D capital affects primarily prospectors’ future operating performance. Depending on the measure of IC intensity or operating performance, the positive relationship between IC and future operating performance can be explained because either the IC expenditures operate as investments that improve future performance or expectations for improved future operating performance trigger increased IC expenditures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3867261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3867261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究从不同的战略取向(即探矿者与捍卫者)和解释(即投资与信号)两个角度探讨了智力资本(IC)与未来经营业绩之间的关系。我们的数据样本包括2000-2009年期间11085家美国上市公司的公司年度观察结果。我们使用组织资本和研发资本作为衡量公司IC强度的指标。战略似乎会影响一家公司被归类为低IC密集型或高IC密集型的可能性。组织资本可以改善具有相同或不同战略方向的公司未来的运营绩效。研发资本主要影响探矿者未来的经营业绩。根据IC强度或经营业绩的衡量标准,可以解释IC与未来经营业绩之间的正关系,因为IC支出要么是作为改善未来业绩的投资,要么是对改善未来经营业绩的预期触发了IC支出的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategy, Intellectual Capital, and Operating Performance
This study explores the relationship between intellectual capital (IC) and future operating performance under the prism of different strategic orientations (i.e., prospectors versus defender) and explanations (i.e., investing versus signaling). Our data sample consists of 11,085 firm-year observations of US listed firms for the period 2000–2019. We employed organizational capital and R&D capital as measures of a firm’s IC intensity. It seems that strategy affects the likelihood of a firm to be classified as a low or high IC intensive. Organizational capital improves future operating performance across firms with the same or with different strategic orientations. R&D capital affects primarily prospectors’ future operating performance. Depending on the measure of IC intensity or operating performance, the positive relationship between IC and future operating performance can be explained because either the IC expenditures operate as investments that improve future performance or expectations for improved future operating performance trigger increased IC expenditures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting
Accounting Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric analysis of risk measures for portfolio optimization The effects of customer relationship management, service quality and relationship marketing on customer retention: The mediation role of bank customer retention in Indonesia Money laundering conviction rate and capital formation in Nigeria The risk premium in times of financial crisis: an assessment from ICAPM on the MENA region Basel accord capital regulations and financial risk management: Empirical evidence from Pakistan’s financial institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1