一项评估短期Kessler心理困扰量表(K6)有效性和心理指标的全国性研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-03 DOI:10.1177/00343552211043261
Emre Umucu, Karen Fortuna, Hyejin Jung, Anita Bialunska, Beatrice Lee, Thenral Mangadu, Marianne Storm, Gul Ergun, Donyeill A Mozer, Jessica Brooks
{"title":"一项评估短期Kessler心理困扰量表(K6)有效性和心理指标的全国性研究","authors":"Emre Umucu, Karen Fortuna, Hyejin Jung, Anita Bialunska, Beatrice Lee, Thenral Mangadu, Marianne Storm, Gul Ergun, Donyeill A Mozer, Jessica Brooks","doi":"10.1177/00343552211043261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale-6 (K6) with a nationally representative clinical sample with various mental health disorders. The cross-sectional, nationally representative, and publicly available data were extracted from the 2014 Health Center Patient Survey (HCPS), which was sponsored by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). After excluding certain individuals for the purpose of this study, we had a total of 1,863 participants. The highest and lowest psychological distress weighted scores were reported by individuals with bipolar disorder (<i>M</i> = 17.16) and individuals with schizophrenia (<i>M</i> = 16.09), respectively, although psychological distress interference was highest in individuals with schizophrenia (<i>M</i> = 2.44). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results yielded a unidimensional factor solution for K6 scale in all subgroups. The K6 is a brief, reliable, and valid measure of psychological distress in adults with panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":47012,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A National Study to Assess Validity and Psychometrics of the Short Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6).\",\"authors\":\"Emre Umucu, Karen Fortuna, Hyejin Jung, Anita Bialunska, Beatrice Lee, Thenral Mangadu, Marianne Storm, Gul Ergun, Donyeill A Mozer, Jessica Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00343552211043261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale-6 (K6) with a nationally representative clinical sample with various mental health disorders. The cross-sectional, nationally representative, and publicly available data were extracted from the 2014 Health Center Patient Survey (HCPS), which was sponsored by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). After excluding certain individuals for the purpose of this study, we had a total of 1,863 participants. The highest and lowest psychological distress weighted scores were reported by individuals with bipolar disorder (<i>M</i> = 17.16) and individuals with schizophrenia (<i>M</i> = 16.09), respectively, although psychological distress interference was highest in individuals with schizophrenia (<i>M</i> = 2.44). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results yielded a unidimensional factor solution for K6 scale in all subgroups. The K6 is a brief, reliable, and valid measure of psychological distress in adults with panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552211043261\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552211043261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在以具有全国代表性的各类心理健康障碍患者为研究对象,检验《凯斯勒心理困扰量表-6》(K6)的效度和信度。横断面的、具有全国代表性的、公开可用的数据是从2014年健康中心患者调查(HCPS)中提取的,该调查由卫生资源和服务管理局(HRSA)赞助。为了本研究的目的,在排除了某些参与者后,我们总共有1863名参与者。双相情感障碍患者(M = 17.16)和精神分裂症患者(M = 16.09)的心理困扰加权得分最高和最低,精神分裂症患者的心理困扰干扰最高(M = 2.44)。探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)结果得出各亚组K6量表的单维因子解。K6是一种简短、可靠、有效的测量成人惊恐障碍、广泛性焦虑障碍、双相情感障碍和精神分裂症心理困扰的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A National Study to Assess Validity and Psychometrics of the Short Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6).

This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale-6 (K6) with a nationally representative clinical sample with various mental health disorders. The cross-sectional, nationally representative, and publicly available data were extracted from the 2014 Health Center Patient Survey (HCPS), which was sponsored by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). After excluding certain individuals for the purpose of this study, we had a total of 1,863 participants. The highest and lowest psychological distress weighted scores were reported by individuals with bipolar disorder (M = 17.16) and individuals with schizophrenia (M = 16.09), respectively, although psychological distress interference was highest in individuals with schizophrenia (M = 2.44). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results yielded a unidimensional factor solution for K6 scale in all subgroups. The K6 is a brief, reliable, and valid measure of psychological distress in adults with panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin (RCB) publishes articles on rehabilitation counseling with a major emphasis on data-based research reports, although other types of contributions to professional knowledge in rehabilitation counseling will be considered. Examples include articles that explain an innovative technique or application, point/ counterpoint debates on a current controversy challenging the profession, or insightful essays on an important issue. Contributions of these kinds may be considered for a special section of RCB. Article topics cover a wide range—from ethical dilemmas related to counseling clients with HIV/AIDS to clinical problem solving in micro–case management.
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Career Development of Students With Disabilities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Book Review: The Dichotomy of Leadership: Balancing the Challenges of Extreme Ownership to Lead and Win Psychometric Validation of the PROMIS Social Support Scale in a Sample of Individuals With Chronic Health Conditions and Disabilities: A Factor Analytic Study Family Perspectives on Promoting Paid Employment for Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Continuing Education Answer Sheet For Volume 67, No 2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1