农村跨部门学校-社区伙伴关系的生态学:文献综述

Q2 Social Sciences Peabody Journal of Education Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.1080/0161956X.2023.2238521
Sarah J. Zuckerman
{"title":"农村跨部门学校-社区伙伴关系的生态学:文献综述","authors":"Sarah J. Zuckerman","doi":"10.1080/0161956X.2023.2238521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cross-sector school-community partnerships have recently garnered attention for their potential to improve outcomes across multiple child- and family-serving organizations. Despite the central role of schools in rural communities, partnerships in these settings have largely been overlooked in the literature. This structured review examines the empirical literature on rural school-community partnerships using an ecological framework to (1) understand what is known about these partnerships; (2) assess the strengths and weaknesses of the literature; and (3) identify directions for future research. The review identified a range of partnership types, as well as facilitating factors including social capital, school leadership, and shared vision. Inhibiting factors are social geography and limited capacity. The review identified an increase in empirical research in recent years; however, weaknesses in the literature included a lack of attention to connecting partnering efforts and outcomes and to the role power. Areas for future research include full-service community schools; critical analysis of power in rural partnership efforts; the tensions of school leadership caused by educational policy and local needs; research that reflects the importance of place, identity, and relationships; and research methods that can identify commonalities and contextual factors and connect partnership efforts and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":39777,"journal":{"name":"Peabody Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ecology of Rural Cross-Sector School-Community Partnerships: A Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Sarah J. Zuckerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0161956X.2023.2238521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Cross-sector school-community partnerships have recently garnered attention for their potential to improve outcomes across multiple child- and family-serving organizations. Despite the central role of schools in rural communities, partnerships in these settings have largely been overlooked in the literature. This structured review examines the empirical literature on rural school-community partnerships using an ecological framework to (1) understand what is known about these partnerships; (2) assess the strengths and weaknesses of the literature; and (3) identify directions for future research. The review identified a range of partnership types, as well as facilitating factors including social capital, school leadership, and shared vision. Inhibiting factors are social geography and limited capacity. The review identified an increase in empirical research in recent years; however, weaknesses in the literature included a lack of attention to connecting partnering efforts and outcomes and to the role power. Areas for future research include full-service community schools; critical analysis of power in rural partnership efforts; the tensions of school leadership caused by educational policy and local needs; research that reflects the importance of place, identity, and relationships; and research methods that can identify commonalities and contextual factors and connect partnership efforts and outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peabody Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peabody Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2023.2238521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peabody Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2023.2238521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要跨部门的学校-社区伙伴关系最近因其改善多个儿童和家庭服务组织成果的潜力而备受关注。尽管学校在农村社区发挥着核心作用,但在这些环境中的伙伴关系在文献中基本上被忽视了。这篇结构化的综述使用生态框架审查了关于农村学校-社区伙伴关系的实证文献,以(1)了解对这些伙伴关系的了解;(2) 评估文献的长处和短处;以及(3)确定未来研究的方向。审查确定了一系列伙伴关系类型,以及促进因素,包括社会资本、学校领导力和共同愿景。抑制因素是社会地理和有限的能力。审查发现,近年来实证研究有所增加;然而,文献中的弱点包括缺乏对建立伙伴关系的努力和成果之间的联系以及对角色权力的关注。未来的研究领域包括提供全方位服务的社区学校;对农村伙伴关系努力中的权力的批判性分析;教育政策和当地需求造成的学校领导层的紧张关系;反映地点、身份和关系重要性的研究;以及能够确定共性和背景因素并将伙伴关系的努力和成果联系起来的研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Ecology of Rural Cross-Sector School-Community Partnerships: A Literature Review
ABSTRACT Cross-sector school-community partnerships have recently garnered attention for their potential to improve outcomes across multiple child- and family-serving organizations. Despite the central role of schools in rural communities, partnerships in these settings have largely been overlooked in the literature. This structured review examines the empirical literature on rural school-community partnerships using an ecological framework to (1) understand what is known about these partnerships; (2) assess the strengths and weaknesses of the literature; and (3) identify directions for future research. The review identified a range of partnership types, as well as facilitating factors including social capital, school leadership, and shared vision. Inhibiting factors are social geography and limited capacity. The review identified an increase in empirical research in recent years; however, weaknesses in the literature included a lack of attention to connecting partnering efforts and outcomes and to the role power. Areas for future research include full-service community schools; critical analysis of power in rural partnership efforts; the tensions of school leadership caused by educational policy and local needs; research that reflects the importance of place, identity, and relationships; and research methods that can identify commonalities and contextual factors and connect partnership efforts and outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peabody Journal of Education
Peabody Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Peabody Journal of Education (PJE) publishes quarterly symposia in the broad area of education, including but not limited to topics related to formal institutions serving students in early childhood, pre-school, primary, elementary, intermediate, secondary, post-secondary, and tertiary education. The scope of the journal includes special kinds of educational institutions, such as those providing vocational training or the schooling for students with disabilities. PJE also welcomes manuscript submissions that concentrate on informal education dynamics, those outside the immediate framework of institutions, and education matters that are important to nations outside the United States.
期刊最新文献
Should Religious Schools Be Publicly Funded? Issues of Religion, Discrimination, and Equity New York City Catholic Schools Operating in the Public Space in a Post- Makin World Education Research-Practice Partnerships: Impacts and Dynamics Broadening our Understanding of how Research-Practice Partnerships Support Educational Improvement and Equitable Transformation Embedding Racialized Selves into the Creation of Research-Practice Partnerships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1