诱惑还是卖淫?吕西亚,为埃拉托色尼的谋杀辩护

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS Emerita Pub Date : 2017-05-31 DOI:10.3989/EMERITA.2017.02.1613
F. C. Gabaudan
{"title":"诱惑还是卖淫?吕西亚,为埃拉托色尼的谋杀辩护","authors":"F. C. Gabaudan","doi":"10.3989/EMERITA.2017.02.1613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I offer a new interpretation of the first speech from the Lysias collection, On the Murder of Erastothenes. I propose that the adultery that led to Erastothenes’ death was consented and that, as such, this case is closer to prostitution than the seduction of a young wife by a Casanova. I believe that, in this way, the circumstances referred to in the narration and the argumentation of the speech are much better explained. This interpretation is related to the known legal regulations regarding prostitution in recent publications on prostitution in Greece, including that of female citizens, which was more common than is usually thought.","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":"85 1","pages":"27-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Seducción o prostitución? Lisias, Defensa por el homicidio de Eratóstenes\",\"authors\":\"F. C. Gabaudan\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/EMERITA.2017.02.1613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I offer a new interpretation of the first speech from the Lysias collection, On the Murder of Erastothenes. I propose that the adultery that led to Erastothenes’ death was consented and that, as such, this case is closer to prostitution than the seduction of a young wife by a Casanova. I believe that, in this way, the circumstances referred to in the narration and the argumentation of the speech are much better explained. This interpretation is related to the known legal regulations regarding prostitution in recent publications on prostitution in Greece, including that of female citizens, which was more common than is usually thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerita\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"27-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/EMERITA.2017.02.1613\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/EMERITA.2017.02.1613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我对利西亚斯文集中的第一篇演讲《论伊拉斯托涅谋杀案》进行了新的解读。我建议,导致伊拉斯托特尼死亡的通奸行为得到了同意,因此,这起案件更像是卖淫,而不是卡萨诺瓦引诱年轻妻子。我相信,通过这种方式,演讲的叙述和论证中提到的情况得到了更好的解释。这种解释与希腊最近出版的关于卖淫的出版物中关于卖淫的已知法律规定有关,包括关于女性公民的法律规定,这比通常认为的更为普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
¿Seducción o prostitución? Lisias, Defensa por el homicidio de Eratóstenes
I offer a new interpretation of the first speech from the Lysias collection, On the Murder of Erastothenes. I propose that the adultery that led to Erastothenes’ death was consented and that, as such, this case is closer to prostitution than the seduction of a young wife by a Casanova. I believe that, in this way, the circumstances referred to in the narration and the argumentation of the speech are much better explained. This interpretation is related to the known legal regulations regarding prostitution in recent publications on prostitution in Greece, including that of female citizens, which was more common than is usually thought.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emerita
Emerita CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1933 by D. Ramón Menéndez Pidal, EMERITA publishes two issues per year, about 400 pages of articles and reviews concerning Classical Philology, Greek, Latin, Indoeuropean and Iberian Linguistics and Ancient History. EMERITA is, since its foundation, one of the best known and valued high level scientific Journals in its field.
期刊最新文献
Apuntes histórico-filológicos sobre la introducción de una carta del emperador Honorio al ejército (Epistula Honorii) Quem colam βασιλέα: paralelos entre Apuleyo y el hermetismo Ramón Menéndez Pidal, Giuliano Bonfante y el nacimiento de la Sección de Estudios Clásicos del CEH Notas filológicas sobre la letra alfa en un nuevo diccionario etimológico del griego, con especial atención al material de Hesiquio Giasone ‘oplita’ ἀμήχανος (A. R. IV 190-205)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1