基于数字图像处理和机器学习方法的签名识别

I. K. N. Putra, Ni Putu Dita Ariani Sukma Dewi, Diah Ayu Pusparani, Dibi Ngabe Mupu
{"title":"基于数字图像处理和机器学习方法的签名识别","authors":"I. K. N. Putra, Ni Putu Dita Ariani Sukma Dewi, Diah Ayu Pusparani, Dibi Ngabe Mupu","doi":"10.31961/eltikom.v7i1.618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Signature is used to legally approve an agreement, treaty, and state administrative activities. Identification of the signature is required to ensure ownership of a signature and to prevent things like forgery from happening to the owner of the signature. In this study, data signatures were obtained from 25 people over the age of 50. The signers provided 20 signatures and were free to choose the stationery used to write the signature on white paper. The total data obtained in this study was 500 signature data. The obtained signature was scanned to create a signature image, which was then pre-processed to prepare it for feature extraction, which can characterize the signature images. The HOG method was used to extract features, resulting in a dataset with 4,536 feature vectors for each signature image. To identify the signature image, the classification methods SVM, Decision Tree, Nave Bayes, and K-NN were compared. SVM achieved the highest accuracy, which is 100%. When K=5, the K-NN method achieved a fairly good accuracy of 97.3%. Meanwhile, Naive Bayes and Decision Tree achieved accuracy significantly lower than K-NN (61%). Because the HOG method produced a large feature vector for each signature, it is recommended that important features that represent signatures be optimized or extracted to produce smaller features to speed up computation without sacrificing accuracy, and that the HOG method be compared to other extraction feature methods to obtain a better model in future research.","PeriodicalId":33096,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal ELTIKOM Jurnal Teknik Elektro Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Signature Identification using Digital Image Processing and Machine Learning Methods\",\"authors\":\"I. K. N. Putra, Ni Putu Dita Ariani Sukma Dewi, Diah Ayu Pusparani, Dibi Ngabe Mupu\",\"doi\":\"10.31961/eltikom.v7i1.618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Signature is used to legally approve an agreement, treaty, and state administrative activities. Identification of the signature is required to ensure ownership of a signature and to prevent things like forgery from happening to the owner of the signature. In this study, data signatures were obtained from 25 people over the age of 50. The signers provided 20 signatures and were free to choose the stationery used to write the signature on white paper. The total data obtained in this study was 500 signature data. The obtained signature was scanned to create a signature image, which was then pre-processed to prepare it for feature extraction, which can characterize the signature images. The HOG method was used to extract features, resulting in a dataset with 4,536 feature vectors for each signature image. To identify the signature image, the classification methods SVM, Decision Tree, Nave Bayes, and K-NN were compared. SVM achieved the highest accuracy, which is 100%. When K=5, the K-NN method achieved a fairly good accuracy of 97.3%. Meanwhile, Naive Bayes and Decision Tree achieved accuracy significantly lower than K-NN (61%). Because the HOG method produced a large feature vector for each signature, it is recommended that important features that represent signatures be optimized or extracted to produce smaller features to speed up computation without sacrificing accuracy, and that the HOG method be compared to other extraction feature methods to obtain a better model in future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal ELTIKOM Jurnal Teknik Elektro Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal ELTIKOM Jurnal Teknik Elektro Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31961/eltikom.v7i1.618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal ELTIKOM Jurnal Teknik Elektro Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31961/eltikom.v7i1.618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

签名用于合法批准协议、条约和国家行政活动。需要对签名进行识别,以确保签名的所有权,并防止伪造等事情发生在签名所有者身上。在这项研究中,数据签名是从25名50岁以上的人身上获得的。签名者提供了20个签名,可以自由选择在白纸上签名的文具。本研究中获得的总数据为500个特征数据。对获得的签名进行扫描以创建签名图像,然后对其进行预处理,为特征提取做准备,特征提取可以表征签名图像。使用HOG方法提取特征,得到每个特征图像具有4536个特征向量的数据集。为了识别特征图像,比较了SVM、决策树、Nave Bayes和K-NN的分类方法。SVM的准确率最高,达到100%。当K=5时,K-NN方法的准确率为97.3%,Naive Bayes和Decision Tree的准确率明显低于K-NN(61%)。由于HOG方法为每个签名产生了一个大的特征向量,因此建议对代表签名的重要特征进行优化或提取,以产生较小的特征,从而在不牺牲精度的情况下加快计算速度,并将HOG方法与其他提取特征方法进行比较,以在未来的研究中获得更好的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Signature Identification using Digital Image Processing and Machine Learning Methods
Signature is used to legally approve an agreement, treaty, and state administrative activities. Identification of the signature is required to ensure ownership of a signature and to prevent things like forgery from happening to the owner of the signature. In this study, data signatures were obtained from 25 people over the age of 50. The signers provided 20 signatures and were free to choose the stationery used to write the signature on white paper. The total data obtained in this study was 500 signature data. The obtained signature was scanned to create a signature image, which was then pre-processed to prepare it for feature extraction, which can characterize the signature images. The HOG method was used to extract features, resulting in a dataset with 4,536 feature vectors for each signature image. To identify the signature image, the classification methods SVM, Decision Tree, Nave Bayes, and K-NN were compared. SVM achieved the highest accuracy, which is 100%. When K=5, the K-NN method achieved a fairly good accuracy of 97.3%. Meanwhile, Naive Bayes and Decision Tree achieved accuracy significantly lower than K-NN (61%). Because the HOG method produced a large feature vector for each signature, it is recommended that important features that represent signatures be optimized or extracted to produce smaller features to speed up computation without sacrificing accuracy, and that the HOG method be compared to other extraction feature methods to obtain a better model in future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Internet of Things- Based Automatic Feeder and Monitoring of Water Temperature, PH, and Salinity for Litopenaeus Vannamei Shrimp Smart Rice Box - The Prototype of Organic Rice Storage Anti-Rice Weevil for Food Security during Pandemic Customer Segmentation Based on Loyalty Level Using K-Means and LRFM Feature Selection in Retail Online Store Signature Identification using Digital Image Processing and Machine Learning Methods ANALISIS DAN PERBANDINGAN STEGANOGRAFI PADA MEDIA AUDIO DAN GAMBAR MENGGUNAKAN LSB DAN RC4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1