西非的社会保护政策和农业劳动力成果

IF 1.6 4区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Agrekon Pub Date : 2021-11-16 DOI:10.1080/03031853.2021.1997773
Romanus Osabohien, O. Matthew, Hajra Maqsood
{"title":"西非的社会保护政策和农业劳动力成果","authors":"Romanus Osabohien, O. Matthew, Hajra Maqsood","doi":"10.1080/03031853.2021.1997773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study engages panel data consisting of 15 West African countries that are members of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). To resolve the possible issues of endogeneity, the system Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) was applied. The data for the analysis was sourced from the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), and the World Development Indicators (WDI) for the period 2005–2018. Findings show that all social protection indicators included in the study are positive and significant in explaining the level of agricultural labour outcome in West Africa. The implication of the result is that policy for social inclusion, building human resources, equity in public resource use and overall social protection coverage may increase agricultural labour outcomes by 0.77%, 0.82% and 0.26%, respectively. The study concludes that to raise labour productivity in West Africa towards the achievement of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially, SDG-1, there is a need for social protection coverage to mitigate shocks and vulnerability.","PeriodicalId":55541,"journal":{"name":"Agrekon","volume":"61 1","pages":"229 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social protection policy and agricultural labour outcome in West Africa\",\"authors\":\"Romanus Osabohien, O. Matthew, Hajra Maqsood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03031853.2021.1997773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study engages panel data consisting of 15 West African countries that are members of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). To resolve the possible issues of endogeneity, the system Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) was applied. The data for the analysis was sourced from the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), and the World Development Indicators (WDI) for the period 2005–2018. Findings show that all social protection indicators included in the study are positive and significant in explaining the level of agricultural labour outcome in West Africa. The implication of the result is that policy for social inclusion, building human resources, equity in public resource use and overall social protection coverage may increase agricultural labour outcomes by 0.77%, 0.82% and 0.26%, respectively. The study concludes that to raise labour productivity in West Africa towards the achievement of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially, SDG-1, there is a need for social protection coverage to mitigate shocks and vulnerability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agrekon\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"229 - 238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agrekon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2021.1997773\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrekon","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2021.1997773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究采用了由西非国家经济共同体(西非经共体)成员国15个西非国家组成的小组数据。为了解决可能存在的内生性问题,采用了系统广义矩量法(GMM)。分析数据来源于粮食及农业组织(FAO)、国家政策和机构评估(CPIA)以及2005-2018年期间的世界发展指标(WDI)。研究结果表明,研究中包含的所有社会保护指标都是积极的,在解释西非农业劳动力成果水平方面具有重要意义。这一结果的含义是,社会包容政策、人力资源建设政策、公共资源使用公平政策和总体社会保护覆盖率可能分别使农业劳动力成果增加0.77%、0.82%和0.26%。该研究得出结论,为了提高西非的劳动生产率,实现联合国可持续发展目标,特别是可持续发展目标1,需要社会保护覆盖范围,以减轻冲击和脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social protection policy and agricultural labour outcome in West Africa
ABSTRACT This study engages panel data consisting of 15 West African countries that are members of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). To resolve the possible issues of endogeneity, the system Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) was applied. The data for the analysis was sourced from the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), and the World Development Indicators (WDI) for the period 2005–2018. Findings show that all social protection indicators included in the study are positive and significant in explaining the level of agricultural labour outcome in West Africa. The implication of the result is that policy for social inclusion, building human resources, equity in public resource use and overall social protection coverage may increase agricultural labour outcomes by 0.77%, 0.82% and 0.26%, respectively. The study concludes that to raise labour productivity in West Africa towards the achievement of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially, SDG-1, there is a need for social protection coverage to mitigate shocks and vulnerability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agrekon
Agrekon AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Agrekon publishes scholarly articles that contribute to the existing literature in the domain of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics as it applies to Southern Africa. The editors of Agrekon therefore invite contributions in this context that provide new insights, either through the problems they address, the methods they employ or the theoretical and practical insights gained from the results. The quarterly journal serves as the official publication of the Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA) and is published by Taylor & Francis.
期刊最新文献
Proposing a farm assessment toolkit: evaluating a South African land reform case study Modelling the exiting of South African producers from commercial agricultural production – an agent-based model The Covid pandemic, cultivation and livelihoods in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Agricultural productivity, land use intensification and rural household welfare: evidence from Ethiopia Is persistent “loadshedding” pulling the plug on agriculture in the Western Cape, South Africa?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1