增加数据共享还是消亡?对自然灾害保险的初步认识

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Geography Pub Date : 2021-02-09 DOI:10.1080/00167487.2022.2019494
P. Timms, J. Hillier, Chris Holland
{"title":"增加数据共享还是消亡?对自然灾害保险的初步认识","authors":"P. Timms, J. Hillier, Chris Holland","doi":"10.1080/00167487.2022.2019494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is an illustration of geography in action, recounting an investigation into an industry’s views of data sharing. The insurance sector is fundamentally analytics driven and based on geospatial data. One option for more effective and efficient insurance for natural hazard risks (e.g. flooding, earthquake) is, in theory, to increase the sharing of data between the various (re)insurance organisations. However, it remains unclear as to what extent this is desirable or practical for commercially sensitive data. This work creates a conceptual model of data sharing in (re)insurance, focusing on loss (claims) data for natural hazards as an illustrative microcosm, including the barriers and solutions to sharing. In light of this, an initial view on the future shape of insurance data sharing is given, finishing with an opinion on whether or not new external disruptors (e.g. start-ups in InsureTech or tech giants such as Google, Amazon and Tencent) pose an existential threat to incumbent firms.","PeriodicalId":46568,"journal":{"name":"Geography","volume":"107 1","pages":"26 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increase data sharing or die? An initial view for natural catastrophe insurance\",\"authors\":\"P. Timms, J. Hillier, Chris Holland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00167487.2022.2019494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article is an illustration of geography in action, recounting an investigation into an industry’s views of data sharing. The insurance sector is fundamentally analytics driven and based on geospatial data. One option for more effective and efficient insurance for natural hazard risks (e.g. flooding, earthquake) is, in theory, to increase the sharing of data between the various (re)insurance organisations. However, it remains unclear as to what extent this is desirable or practical for commercially sensitive data. This work creates a conceptual model of data sharing in (re)insurance, focusing on loss (claims) data for natural hazards as an illustrative microcosm, including the barriers and solutions to sharing. In light of this, an initial view on the future shape of insurance data sharing is given, finishing with an opinion on whether or not new external disruptors (e.g. start-ups in InsureTech or tech giants such as Google, Amazon and Tencent) pose an existential threat to incumbent firms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geography\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"26 - 37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2022.2019494\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2022.2019494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇文章是地理在行动的例证,叙述了对一个行业的数据共享观点的调查。保险行业基本上是基于地理空间数据的分析驱动的。从理论上讲,为自然灾害风险(如洪水、地震)提供更有效和高效保险的一个选择是,增加不同(再)保险机构之间的数据共享。然而,对于商业敏感数据,这在多大程度上是可取的或实用的,目前尚不清楚。这项工作创建了一个(再)保险数据共享的概念模型,重点关注自然灾害损失(索赔)数据作为一个说明性的缩影,包括共享的障碍和解决方案。鉴于此,本文给出了对保险数据共享未来形态的初步看法,最后提出了新的外部颠覆者(例如InsureTech的初创企业或b谷歌、亚马逊和腾讯等科技巨头)是否会对现有公司构成生存威胁的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increase data sharing or die? An initial view for natural catastrophe insurance
ABSTRACT This article is an illustration of geography in action, recounting an investigation into an industry’s views of data sharing. The insurance sector is fundamentally analytics driven and based on geospatial data. One option for more effective and efficient insurance for natural hazard risks (e.g. flooding, earthquake) is, in theory, to increase the sharing of data between the various (re)insurance organisations. However, it remains unclear as to what extent this is desirable or practical for commercially sensitive data. This work creates a conceptual model of data sharing in (re)insurance, focusing on loss (claims) data for natural hazards as an illustrative microcosm, including the barriers and solutions to sharing. In light of this, an initial view on the future shape of insurance data sharing is given, finishing with an opinion on whether or not new external disruptors (e.g. start-ups in InsureTech or tech giants such as Google, Amazon and Tencent) pose an existential threat to incumbent firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geography
Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
21.40%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: An international journal, Geography meets the interests of lecturers, teachers and students in post-16 geography.
期刊最新文献
Geography, antisemitism and Zionism Diversification and transition in French Alpine resorts ‘Teaching for Sustainable Futures’: a research-informed professional development course Near and far: engaging students with place through Minecraft European supermarket retailers and climate change: reducing greenhouse gas emissions towards net-zero
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1