设计电子卡片包装防止运输冲击

Q4 Engineering Journal of the IEST Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.17764/1557-2196-64.1.42
C. Taylor, B. Notohardjono, Suraush Q. Khambati, S. Canfield
{"title":"设计电子卡片包装防止运输冲击","authors":"C. Taylor, B. Notohardjono, Suraush Q. Khambati, S. Canfield","doi":"10.17764/1557-2196-64.1.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In optimizing packaging design, the product’s fragility is qualified by a protype undergoing quantitative and qualitative tests that rely heavily on past knowledge and experiments. By the addition of finite element analysis (FEA), the product’s fragility can be obtained in the initial stages of product design with material characterization and simulation. FEA can predict Gs on the product as well as examine the strains, which interpret product failure more easily in the design stage. To incorporate FEA, first the foam material was measured at various strain rates under compression. Next a shipping package containing an Al block with consistent density was dropped at different heights—610 mm (24”), 915 mm (36”), and 1067 mm (42”)—to confirm the methodology. An I/O book was packaged for the final demonstration incorporating FEA with an electronic card package. In an electronic card package, the electronic assemblies are sensitive to strains on the system board. If the strains on the board are high, the assemblies’ solder connections to the board could be damaged and result in a defect during shipment. The simulations’ predicted Gs and board strains were compared to experimental drop testing results at 610 mm (24”) and 915 mm (36”). The simulation results for each sensor location were within reasonable approximation of the experimental results, verifying that FEA could be used in the initial design stages to predict the accelerations and strains for packaging development in parallel to the product design.","PeriodicalId":35935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the IEST","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Electronic Card Packages Against Shipping Shock\",\"authors\":\"C. Taylor, B. Notohardjono, Suraush Q. Khambati, S. Canfield\",\"doi\":\"10.17764/1557-2196-64.1.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In optimizing packaging design, the product’s fragility is qualified by a protype undergoing quantitative and qualitative tests that rely heavily on past knowledge and experiments. By the addition of finite element analysis (FEA), the product’s fragility can be obtained in the initial stages of product design with material characterization and simulation. FEA can predict Gs on the product as well as examine the strains, which interpret product failure more easily in the design stage. To incorporate FEA, first the foam material was measured at various strain rates under compression. Next a shipping package containing an Al block with consistent density was dropped at different heights—610 mm (24”), 915 mm (36”), and 1067 mm (42”)—to confirm the methodology. An I/O book was packaged for the final demonstration incorporating FEA with an electronic card package. In an electronic card package, the electronic assemblies are sensitive to strains on the system board. If the strains on the board are high, the assemblies’ solder connections to the board could be damaged and result in a defect during shipment. The simulations’ predicted Gs and board strains were compared to experimental drop testing results at 610 mm (24”) and 915 mm (36”). The simulation results for each sensor location were within reasonable approximation of the experimental results, verifying that FEA could be used in the initial design stages to predict the accelerations and strains for packaging development in parallel to the product design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the IEST\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the IEST\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17764/1557-2196-64.1.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the IEST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17764/1557-2196-64.1.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在优化包装设计时,产品的脆弱性是由经过定量和定性测试的原型来鉴定的,这些测试在很大程度上依赖于过去的知识和实验。通过添加有限元分析(FEA),可以在产品设计的初始阶段通过材料表征和模拟来获得产品的脆性。有限元分析可以预测产品上的Gs,也可以检查应变,从而在设计阶段更容易地解释产品故障。为了结合有限元分析,首先在压缩下以不同的应变速率测量泡沫材料。接下来,将一个包含密度一致的铝块的运输包装扔到不同的高度——610毫米(24英寸)、915毫米(36英寸)和1067毫米(42英寸)——以确认方法。一本输入/输出手册被打包,用于将有限元分析与电子卡包相结合的最终演示。在电子卡封装中,电子组件对系统板上的应变敏感。如果电路板上的应变很高,组件与电路板的焊接连接可能会损坏,并在运输过程中导致缺陷。模拟预测的Gs和板应变与610毫米(24英寸)和915毫米(36英寸)的实验跌落测试结果进行了比较。每个传感器位置的模拟结果都在实验结果的合理近似范围内,验证了有限元分析可以在初始设计阶段用于预测与产品设计并行的包装开发的加速度和应变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing Electronic Card Packages Against Shipping Shock
In optimizing packaging design, the product’s fragility is qualified by a protype undergoing quantitative and qualitative tests that rely heavily on past knowledge and experiments. By the addition of finite element analysis (FEA), the product’s fragility can be obtained in the initial stages of product design with material characterization and simulation. FEA can predict Gs on the product as well as examine the strains, which interpret product failure more easily in the design stage. To incorporate FEA, first the foam material was measured at various strain rates under compression. Next a shipping package containing an Al block with consistent density was dropped at different heights—610 mm (24”), 915 mm (36”), and 1067 mm (42”)—to confirm the methodology. An I/O book was packaged for the final demonstration incorporating FEA with an electronic card package. In an electronic card package, the electronic assemblies are sensitive to strains on the system board. If the strains on the board are high, the assemblies’ solder connections to the board could be damaged and result in a defect during shipment. The simulations’ predicted Gs and board strains were compared to experimental drop testing results at 610 mm (24”) and 915 mm (36”). The simulation results for each sensor location were within reasonable approximation of the experimental results, verifying that FEA could be used in the initial design stages to predict the accelerations and strains for packaging development in parallel to the product design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the IEST
Journal of the IEST Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of the IEST is an official publication of the Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology and is of archival quality and noncommercial in nature. It was established to advance knowledge through technical articles selected by peer review, and has been published for over 50 years as a benefit to IEST members and the technical community at large as as a permanent record of progress in the science and technology of the environmental sciences
期刊最新文献
Update of ISO Technical Committee 209 Cleanrooms and Associated Controlled Environments Designing Electronic Card Packages Against Shipping Shock Strategies for the Control of Visible Particles in Sterile Devices Energy efficiency in cleanrooms and separative devices: ISO 14644-16, outreach article Shaker Testing with Simultaneous Control of PSD and FDS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1