反对“意识形态中立”:论自由主义和新自由主义经济和社会人权的局限性

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2020-12-06 DOI:10.1093/lril/lraa019
Zachary Manfredi
{"title":"反对“意识形态中立”:论自由主义和新自由主义经济和社会人权的局限性","authors":"Zachary Manfredi","doi":"10.1093/lril/lraa019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article intervenes in contemporary debates about the future of economic and social human rights. It analyses neoliberal and mainstream liberal theories and argues that both approaches substantially limit understanding of these rights. The article concludes by discussing some of the challenges facing an alternative, socialist conception of economic and social rights.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Against ‘ideological neutrality’: on the limits of liberal and neoliberal economic and social human rights\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Manfredi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/lril/lraa019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article intervenes in contemporary debates about the future of economic and social human rights. It analyses neoliberal and mainstream liberal theories and argues that both approaches substantially limit understanding of these rights. The article concludes by discussing some of the challenges facing an alternative, socialist conception of economic and social rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"London Review of International Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"London Review of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lraa019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Review of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lraa019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介入当代关于经济和社会人权未来的辩论。它分析了新自由主义和主流自由主义理论,并认为这两种方法都在很大程度上限制了对这些权利的理解。文章最后讨论了另一种社会主义经济和社会权利观所面临的一些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Against ‘ideological neutrality’: on the limits of liberal and neoliberal economic and social human rights
This article intervenes in contemporary debates about the future of economic and social human rights. It analyses neoliberal and mainstream liberal theories and argues that both approaches substantially limit understanding of these rights. The article concludes by discussing some of the challenges facing an alternative, socialist conception of economic and social rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
‘Nowhere home’ Doing legality as doing drag: the Yogyakarta Principles and the productive power of performing international law-making Is critique part of the practice of international law? ‘English in taste, Indian in blood’: caste hegemony in the making of British international legal thought Ethical challenges of using trial transcripts for research purposes: A case study of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1