个性化或创造性能减少广告盲目性吗?

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Advertising Research Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.2501/jar-2022-014
Farzad Abedi, S. Koslow
{"title":"个性化或创造性能减少广告盲目性吗?","authors":"Farzad Abedi, S. Koslow","doi":"10.2501/jar-2022-014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To counter banner blindness, practitioners often use a media-based personalized advertising strategy to target consumers. Another approach, however, is suggested here, a creativity-based strategy. To compare the two strategies, the authors explored a psychology framework—executive functions—that explains why a creativity-based strategy may work better in some situations. Two key executive functions, inhibitory control and working memory, keep consumers focused on media content rather than on banner advertisements. Highly creative advertising, however, activates another executive function, cognitive flexibility, which counters inhibitory control, so advertisements sometimes get increased attention. The authors applied an eye-tracking experiment and took several measures of advertisement effectiveness. Contrary to expectations, personalized advertising was found to lead to better memory responses, moderately higher attention, and somewhat more positive brand attitudes when consumers are casually surfing. Highly creative advertising, however, still garnered more attention overall and also led to even more positive brand attitudes when consumers were using media in a goal-directed way. Although the authors argue that a creativity approach may work better in most situations, it is also possible that both strategies can be implemented at the same time.","PeriodicalId":51400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advertising Research","volume":"62 1","pages":"201 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Personalization or Creativity Reduce Banner Blindness?\",\"authors\":\"Farzad Abedi, S. Koslow\",\"doi\":\"10.2501/jar-2022-014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To counter banner blindness, practitioners often use a media-based personalized advertising strategy to target consumers. Another approach, however, is suggested here, a creativity-based strategy. To compare the two strategies, the authors explored a psychology framework—executive functions—that explains why a creativity-based strategy may work better in some situations. Two key executive functions, inhibitory control and working memory, keep consumers focused on media content rather than on banner advertisements. Highly creative advertising, however, activates another executive function, cognitive flexibility, which counters inhibitory control, so advertisements sometimes get increased attention. The authors applied an eye-tracking experiment and took several measures of advertisement effectiveness. Contrary to expectations, personalized advertising was found to lead to better memory responses, moderately higher attention, and somewhat more positive brand attitudes when consumers are casually surfing. Highly creative advertising, however, still garnered more attention overall and also led to even more positive brand attitudes when consumers were using media in a goal-directed way. Although the authors argue that a creativity approach may work better in most situations, it is also possible that both strategies can be implemented at the same time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advertising Research\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"201 - 218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advertising Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-2022-014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advertising Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-2022-014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了对抗横幅盲目性,从业者经常使用基于媒体的个性化广告策略来瞄准消费者。然而,这里提出了另一种方法,一种基于创造力的策略。为了比较这两种策略,作者探索了一个心理学框架——执行功能——来解释为什么基于创造力的策略在某些情况下可能更有效。两个关键的执行功能,抑制控制和工作记忆,使消费者专注于媒体内容,而不是横幅广告。然而,极富创意的广告会激活另一种执行功能,即对抗抑制性控制的认知灵活性,因此广告有时会得到更多的关注。作者采用了眼球追踪实验,并采用了几种衡量广告效果的方法。与预期相反,当消费者随意浏览时,个性化广告会带来更好的记忆反应、更高的注意力和更积极的品牌态度。然而,当消费者以目标导向的方式使用媒体时,高度创意的广告仍然获得了更多的关注,并导致了更积极的品牌态度。尽管作者认为创造性方法在大多数情况下可能效果更好,但这两种策略也有可能同时实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can Personalization or Creativity Reduce Banner Blindness?
To counter banner blindness, practitioners often use a media-based personalized advertising strategy to target consumers. Another approach, however, is suggested here, a creativity-based strategy. To compare the two strategies, the authors explored a psychology framework—executive functions—that explains why a creativity-based strategy may work better in some situations. Two key executive functions, inhibitory control and working memory, keep consumers focused on media content rather than on banner advertisements. Highly creative advertising, however, activates another executive function, cognitive flexibility, which counters inhibitory control, so advertisements sometimes get increased attention. The authors applied an eye-tracking experiment and took several measures of advertisement effectiveness. Contrary to expectations, personalized advertising was found to lead to better memory responses, moderately higher attention, and somewhat more positive brand attitudes when consumers are casually surfing. Highly creative advertising, however, still garnered more attention overall and also led to even more positive brand attitudes when consumers were using media in a goal-directed way. Although the authors argue that a creativity approach may work better in most situations, it is also possible that both strategies can be implemented at the same time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The ARF is the preeminent professional organization in the field of advertising, market and media research. Its combined membership represents more than 325 advertisers, advertising agencies, research firms, media companies, educational institutions and international organizations. Founded in 1936 by the Association of National Advertisers and the American Association of Advertising Agencies, the ARF leads key industry learning initiatives that increase the contribution of research to better marketing, more effective advertising and profitable organic growth. The principal mission of The ARF is to improve the practice of advertising, marketing and media research in pursuit of more effective marketing and advertising communications.
期刊最新文献
Why a Single Pro-Environmental Appeal Works to Promote Behavioral Change When Are Photographs or Illustrations More Effective in Public Service Ads? Navigating the Rapid Currents Of Advertising If I Understand Why a Product Looks Weird, Will I Buy It? Does Childhood Exposure to a Brand Improve Brand Name Recognition?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1