{"title":"绝对准确的相似性:博尔赫斯和罗伊斯的地图和媒体","authors":"J. Peters, H. Burgos","doi":"10.18272/post(s).v7i7.2528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Josiah Royce, the American idealist philosopher (1855-1916), is best known to readers of Borges in connection with a recursive map-within-a-map drawn upon the soil of England. Indeed, Borges ranks \"el mapa de Royce\" side-by-side with his beloved Zeno´´´ s paradox in “Otro poema de los dones” (336), a Whitmanesque catalog of a few of his favorite things. Borges appreciated Royce as a fellow-wanderer through the late nineteenth-century thickets of both Anglo-American idealism and the new mathematics of transfinite numbers. Royce was not so much an influence on Borges as a fellow traveler who had arrived in a somewhat similar place after passing through Berkeley, Schopenhauer, and Cantor. \nAfter cataloging connections between the two thinkers and explicating Royce's map, I will suggest that both figures are theorists of infinity and metaphysicians of the copy who offer fertile suggestions to our understanding of media in general and maps in particular. Though Royce and Borges both can strike some readers as architects of suffocating idealistic structures, there is a difference. Royce thinks his figures of infinity really do disclose the truth about the universe. Borges sees in such figures the paradoxes and slippages involved in any project of perfect duplication, and his skepticism about philosophical representation is designed, ultimately, to provide oxygen and exit from totalitarian systems. In this I would view Borges as a follower of Royce's close friend, Harvard colleague and philosophical antagonist: William James. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":33901,"journal":{"name":"Posts","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semblanza absolutamente exacta: mapas y medios en Borges y Royce\",\"authors\":\"J. Peters, H. Burgos\",\"doi\":\"10.18272/post(s).v7i7.2528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Josiah Royce, the American idealist philosopher (1855-1916), is best known to readers of Borges in connection with a recursive map-within-a-map drawn upon the soil of England. Indeed, Borges ranks \\\"el mapa de Royce\\\" side-by-side with his beloved Zeno´´´ s paradox in “Otro poema de los dones” (336), a Whitmanesque catalog of a few of his favorite things. Borges appreciated Royce as a fellow-wanderer through the late nineteenth-century thickets of both Anglo-American idealism and the new mathematics of transfinite numbers. Royce was not so much an influence on Borges as a fellow traveler who had arrived in a somewhat similar place after passing through Berkeley, Schopenhauer, and Cantor. \\nAfter cataloging connections between the two thinkers and explicating Royce's map, I will suggest that both figures are theorists of infinity and metaphysicians of the copy who offer fertile suggestions to our understanding of media in general and maps in particular. Though Royce and Borges both can strike some readers as architects of suffocating idealistic structures, there is a difference. Royce thinks his figures of infinity really do disclose the truth about the universe. Borges sees in such figures the paradoxes and slippages involved in any project of perfect duplication, and his skepticism about philosophical representation is designed, ultimately, to provide oxygen and exit from totalitarian systems. In this I would view Borges as a follower of Royce's close friend, Harvard colleague and philosophical antagonist: William James. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":33901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Posts\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Posts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18272/post(s).v7i7.2528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Posts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18272/post(s).v7i7.2528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Josiah Royce,美国唯心主义哲学家(1855-1916),最为博尔赫斯读者所知的是在英国土地上绘制的递归地图。事实上,博尔赫斯排名在《Otro poema de los dones》(336)中,“el mapa de Royce”与他心爱的泽诺´´的悖论并列,这是一本惠特曼风格的目录,收录了他最喜欢的一些东西。博尔赫斯欣赏罗伊斯,认为他是十九世纪末英美理想主义和超限数新数学的漫游者。与其说罗伊斯对博尔赫斯的影响,不如说他是一个旅行家,在经过伯克利、叔本华和康托尔之后,来到了一个有点相似的地方。在编目了这两位思想家之间的联系并解释了罗伊斯的地图之后,我认为这两位人物都是无限论者和副本的形而上学者,他们为我们理解一般媒体,特别是地图提供了丰富的建议。尽管罗伊斯和博尔赫斯都可以作为令人窒息的理想主义结构的建筑师给一些读者留下深刻印象,但这是有区别的。罗伊斯认为他的无穷大数字确实揭示了宇宙的真相。博尔赫斯在这些人物身上看到了任何完美复制项目中所涉及的悖论和失误,他对哲学表现的怀疑最终是为了提供氧气和逃离极权主义体系。在这方面,我认为博尔赫斯是罗伊斯的密友、哈佛大学的同事和哲学对手威廉·詹姆斯的追随者。
Semblanza absolutamente exacta: mapas y medios en Borges y Royce
Josiah Royce, the American idealist philosopher (1855-1916), is best known to readers of Borges in connection with a recursive map-within-a-map drawn upon the soil of England. Indeed, Borges ranks "el mapa de Royce" side-by-side with his beloved Zeno´´´ s paradox in “Otro poema de los dones” (336), a Whitmanesque catalog of a few of his favorite things. Borges appreciated Royce as a fellow-wanderer through the late nineteenth-century thickets of both Anglo-American idealism and the new mathematics of transfinite numbers. Royce was not so much an influence on Borges as a fellow traveler who had arrived in a somewhat similar place after passing through Berkeley, Schopenhauer, and Cantor.
After cataloging connections between the two thinkers and explicating Royce's map, I will suggest that both figures are theorists of infinity and metaphysicians of the copy who offer fertile suggestions to our understanding of media in general and maps in particular. Though Royce and Borges both can strike some readers as architects of suffocating idealistic structures, there is a difference. Royce thinks his figures of infinity really do disclose the truth about the universe. Borges sees in such figures the paradoxes and slippages involved in any project of perfect duplication, and his skepticism about philosophical representation is designed, ultimately, to provide oxygen and exit from totalitarian systems. In this I would view Borges as a follower of Royce's close friend, Harvard colleague and philosophical antagonist: William James.